Wandering Yellow
Well-known member
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 5,590
All communists are people from the left. Pointless discussion.Well no, but all Nazis are people on the right.
National Socialist Party..
All communists are people from the left. Pointless discussion.Well no, but all Nazis are people on the right.
All communists are people from the left. Pointless discussion.
National Socialist Party..
The Left can be pretty "Nazi-ish" as well..... especially if you are Jewish....
I'd like to see a comedy about Hitler killing jews or something and the leaders of the Myanmar putsch singling out a minority and the Uigahrs, plenty of fun times to be had with them!!
I don't think right wing people get "offended" by wokeists bringing out a new gender every week, I just think they believe in science.Aye.
And right-wing wokeists occur. Getting offended at every taking of the knee, every new definition of gender...
Anyone see a pattern?
I don't think right wing people get "offended" by wokeists bringing out a new gender every week, I just think they believe in science.
Here we go again.I don't think right wing people get "offended" by wokeists bringing out a new gender every week, I just think they believe in science.
I just responded to his comment with my opinion.Here we go again.
I do get this... but with the greatest respect I don’t need to meet your expectations of proof (quotation marks) to know what ive read for a decade or more. I have better things to do than go searching out articles I’ve read that have had me raise my eyebrows. We are not here to serve the burden of proof on your expectations of what proof should look like. I provided you three links including from an independent arbiter of news neutrality.You're not getting this are you.
I'm not asking for articles by others giving their views of the BBC, I'm asking for members of the forum who have claimed BBC bias (either way) to post past or present BBC news reports etc with their explanation as to why they think they are biased (either way).
I don't want to be rude but is this really so difficult to understand?
"I just think they believe in science." is more than an opinion. "I just think " is an opinion, "believe in science" is an implicit assertion that "science" supports a a dogma of binary gender. It simply doesn't. We've already been around that circle, that why I said "here we go again".I just responded to his comment with my opinion.
Not sure what your issue is.
I don't think right wing people get "offended" by wokeists bringing out a new gender every week, I just think they believe in science.
This thread is called 'Evidence of BBC bias' so if you 'have better things to do than go searching out articles I’ve read that have had me raise my eyebrows' why are you on here at all?I do get this... but with the greatest respect I don’t need to meet your expectations of proof (quotation marks) to know what ive read for a decade or more. I have better things to do than go searching out articles I’ve read that have had me raise my eyebrows. We are not here to serve the burden of proof on your expectations of what proof should look like. I provided you three links including from an independent arbiter of news neutrality.
im sorry that you feel the quotation marks usurps all that.
For the record I’m a political centrist with a degree in political theory and have written about this very topic.
No worries, Jim Davidson is out there ready to lend his support to the Conservative party - racism, homophobia and misogyny to the fore!Bring back Freddie Starr I say.
Good lord.This thread is called 'Evidence of BBC bias' so if you 'have better things to do than go searching out articles I’ve read that have had me raise my eyebrows' why are you on here at all?
You have had time to search out articles by other people who believe the BBC has a left wing bias but you can't find any actual examples yourself.
Absolutely! Seven pages in and still not a single example of left wing bias at the BBC.Good lord.
All I'm asking is for those people who have claimed the BBC has a left wing bias to post evidence to support their claim. Is that really too much to ask?Well yes.
But I submit that most of us think your 'right wing bias' examples are pretty spurious as well (and I am not exactly right wing!) so I'm not sure what the point of the thread is!
Well they are talking rubbish - as are people on the other side who claim there is endemic tight wing bias. There are of course examples here or there where individual contributors have certain view on certain matters. That does not mean the BBC as an entity have some sort of deliberate bias. I suspect when some of the right wing contributors shout 'left wing bias' it is simply when the BBC is holding the government to account - as it did when we had a Labour government, and (guess what?) then it was the left leaning who shouted 'right wing bias'!All I'm asking is for those people who have claimed the BBC has a left wing bias to post evidence to support their claim. Is that really too much to ask?