100% agree with due legal process in the UK.
In this case that due legal process is being followed and the rule of law.
The ruling says that she cannot re-enter the country to appeal against removal of her citizenship as she is a risk to national security.
The removal of her citizenship was a perfectly legal move by the Home Secretary as she had dual citizenship, although Bangladesh disagree on that.
Her ending up in a Syrian camp is entirely of her choosing, tough luck.
If she is stuck there for another 10, 15, 20 years..... tough luck
It also seems her legal team, who are probably funded by us the taxpayer, took the wrong route, tough luck again.
"As Ms Begum did not advance that argument before the Court of Appeal, her appeal against the LTE decision should have been dismissed."
As Sajid Javid said: "There are no simple solutions to this situation, but any restrictions of rights and freedoms faced by this individual are a direct consequence of the extreme actions that she and others have taken"
And for balance......
In the liberal world of Twatter:
"Human rights group Liberty tweeted: “The right to a fair trial protects all of us. Stripping someone’s citizenship without due process sets a dangerous precedent."
However there was due process.
Bangladeshi national law states that citizenship is given automatically at birth through bloodline (jus sanguinis), giving them dual nationality.
Unless they make an active effort to retain it, however, their Bangladeshi citizenship effectively becomes dormant at the age of 21.
Her ability to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship through her parental citizenship makes the removal of her British citizenship lawful.
That she chooses not to is not the UK`s problem.