New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Planning

Submitted:

"If OUFC fail to secure this planning application this will make national headlines, the new Football Governance Bill has been brought in to ensure that community football clubs are preserved and supported. Such football clubs should not face the threat of extinction due to previous mismanagement. Unfortunately OUFC's lease at the Kassam Stadium is expiring in 2026 with the club facing nowhere else to play. They are currently forced into a damning contract whereby the club is strangled by a sizeable rent and outrageous yearly service charge. OUFC have dragged themselves back up the football league from the National League with this ball & chain behind them and have done brilliantly to stabilise in League One. Yet still, Championship football is on cards if they could put that rent saving into the playing budget, as well as finally benefitting from food and drink sales within the stadium.

You only have to look at Brighton & Hove Albion to see the benefits this can be bring to the local community and Oxfordshire. Previous owners sold their original ground for their own financial gain with the club receiving almost zero money from the sale (The Manor, being a similar scenario). They were then forced to play in an undesirable athletics stadium for over a decade, averaging just 6000 fans per season until their final year. This poorly located "stadium", with zero atmosphere, facilities and rent costs almost forced Brighton out of business. That was until they submitted planning for a new stadium, outside of Brighton City Centre but with a dedicated train station (sounds familiar). Brightons new Falmer Stadium had an initial capacity of 22,000 but has since been increased to 31,800. Brighton's catchment area is extremely similar to Oxfords, with very few local professional football clubs to compete with. Brightons final season in the old stadium saw an average attendance of 7300, their first season in the new stadium saw an average of 20,000. They have not had a smaller average attendance since despite being one league above Oxford for 7 of those years, and since 2017 have averaged 30,000 in the Premier League.

Oxford's proposal is just 16,000, fairly modest in comparison yet has the same potential, especially with the club pushing for promotion to the Championship.

While the footballing significance is clear, an independent assessment has revealed the incredible economic impact of Brighton's achievements on the city.

In 2022/23 season, Brighton brought in £595m to the local economy. This total included £327m of direct income, £26m spent by visitors, £20m spent on goods and services in Brighton & Hove by club employees and a further £222m of brand and media value to the local economy, which greatly increases the city’s profile around the world.

This is the second time since promotion to the Premier League in 2017 that the club’s contribution to the local economy has been measured.

Compared to the first appraisal, released in 2019 and based on the club’s first season in the Premier League, it has gone up nearly three-fold by an astonishing 281%.

Last season 54,000 visitors from overseas were among the 600,000 people who watched games at the American Express Stadium (Falmer Stadium).

By spending £26m in the city, visitors from outside Brighton & Hove supported 379 jobs while the club’s employees spent more than £20m, in businesses in and around the city, evidence of the club’s strong local supply chains.

In addition, the Amex hosted over 830 events last season, attracting 48,000 visitors and contributing £3.5m to the local economy.

The potential this application has for the city of Oxford and Oxfordshire is astonishing and cannot be ignored. Sure, there will be some objections by locals worried by traffic and parking, but as seen at Brighton this can be easily overcome especially with a major train station on the doorstep. Parking schemes can be introduced, pedestrian crossings, bridges can all be applied at a later date as seen at many stadiums.

The architects for the new Oxford stadium have already designed and seen the construction of a 17,000 seat stadium for Brentford, on a smaller triangular piece of land. There is no reason why this stadium cannot be built to a similar high standard on a piece of land that is currently unused scrubland, previously used as a BMX track.

This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to benefit future generations and to safeguard the football club. "
 
WuTang said:
Submitted:

"If OUFC fail to secure this planning application this will make national headlines, the new Football Governance Bill has been brought in to ensure that community football clubs are preserved and supported. Such football clubs should not face the threat of extinction due to previous mismanagement. Unfortunately OUFC's lease at the Kassam Stadium is expiring in 2026 with the club facing nowhere else to play. They are currently forced into a damning contract whereby the club is strangled by a sizeable rent and outrageous yearly service charge. OUFC have dragged themselves back up the football league from the National League with this ball & chain behind them and have done brilliantly to stabilise in League One. Yet still, Championship football is on cards if they could put that rent saving into the playing budget, as well as finally benefitting from food and drink sales within the stadium.

You only have to look at Brighton & Hove Albion to see the benefits this can be bring to the local community and Oxfordshire. Previous owners sold their original ground for their own financial gain with the club receiving almost zero money from the sale (The Manor, being a similar scenario). They were then forced to play in an undesirable athletics stadium for over a decade, averaging just 6000 fans per season until their final year. This poorly located "stadium", with zero atmosphere, facilities and rent costs almost forced Brighton out of business. That was until they submitted planning for a new stadium, outside of Brighton City Centre but with a dedicated train station (sounds familiar). Brightons new Falmer Stadium had an initial capacity of 22,000 but has since been increased to 31,800. Brighton's catchment area is extremely similar to Oxfords, with very few local professional football clubs to compete with. Brightons final season in the old stadium saw an average attendance of 7300, their first season in the new stadium saw an average of 20,000. They have not had a smaller average attendance since despite being one league above Oxford for 7 of those years, and since 2017 have averaged 30,000 in the Premier League.

Oxford's proposal is just 16,000, fairly modest in comparison yet has the same potential, especially with the club pushing for promotion to the Championship.

While the footballing significance is clear, an independent assessment has revealed the incredible economic impact of Brighton's achievements on the city.

In 2022/23 season, Brighton brought in £595m to the local economy. This total included £327m of direct income, £26m spent by visitors, £20m spent on goods and services in Brighton & Hove by club employees and a further £222m of brand and media value to the local economy, which greatly increases the city’s profile around the world.

This is the second time since promotion to the Premier League in 2017 that the club’s contribution to the local economy has been measured.

Compared to the first appraisal, released in 2019 and based on the club’s first season in the Premier League, it has gone up nearly three-fold by an astonishing 281%.

Last season 54,000 visitors from overseas were among the 600,000 people who watched games at the American Express Stadium (Falmer Stadium).

By spending £26m in the city, visitors from outside Brighton & Hove supported 379 jobs while the club’s employees spent more than £20m, in businesses in and around the city, evidence of the club’s strong local supply chains.

In addition, the Amex hosted over 830 events last season, attracting 48,000 visitors and contributing £3.5m to the local economy.

The potential this application has for the city of Oxford and Oxfordshire is astonishing and cannot be ignored. Sure, there will be some objections by locals worried by traffic and parking, but as seen at Brighton this can be easily overcome especially with a major train station on the doorstep. Parking schemes can be introduced, pedestrian crossings, bridges can all be applied at a later date as seen at many stadiums.

The architects for the new Oxford stadium have already designed and seen the construction of a 17,000 seat stadium for Brentford, on a smaller triangular piece of land. There is no reason why this stadium cannot be built to a similar high standard on a piece of land that is currently unused scrubland, previously used as a BMX track.

This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to benefit future generations and to safeguard the football club. "
Click to expand...

Great comments. And we need more posts of this calibre on the planning on here rather than talk about the individuals that oppose us in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Dear Mark Bond,
Thank you for your email making the following comments on application number 24/00539/F:

"Tackley is a fair distance from this development and will have little or no effect on the people who live here. Despite this we do have a local councillor who is very vocal and vehemently anti when it comes to any aspect regarding this development. As a resident I cannot understand why this is. I’m not a supporter of football, but feel that we need such a facility for our younger generation and strongly disagree agree with the vast number of somewhat controversial issues that the particular councillor raises.

Bearing everything in mind, I strongly support this application. I would hope that the officers in Cherwell will approve the application and that’s from someone who resides in the West Oxfordshire District Council area. Having spent a great deal of time going through the application, I cannot for the life of me understand why anyone is concerned regarding traffic issues. It has been suggested that the Oxford Road would be closed for 3 hours prior to kickoff and 3 hours after the game has finished, this is complete rubbish. My daughter and her husband live near a premiership club who regularly have double the maximum supporters that the proposed stadium will hold. I mention this because she assures me that less than 2 hours after the game is over, there is little or no evidence that a game has been played. The club in question has nowhere near the number of alternative ways of travel that this development has. Our local councillor talks rubbish when highlighting travel issues.

Please approve this application, not for me a 75 year old man, but for our future generations of all genders. Any council that has the opportunity to build such a superb venue at no cost to their electorate, would I feel be open to being taken to the Secretary of State in the event of refusal.

The amount of consultation taken so far is amazing and those involved should be proud of what they have produced. Would you not feel proud to have the first ever net zero development in the UK on your doorstep or even in your constituency? I know I would.

Having seen the amount of community work that Oxford United already carry out and how that’s going to grow in the future along with the growth of women’s football, they show how inclusive they are. We as a community cannot and should not see this opportunity be thrown away by a section of not in my back yard objectors being scant with the truth.

LETS GET THIS BUILT DO NOT TURN THIS OPPORTUNITY DOWN"
Click to expand...
 
Orkney Islands Yellow said:
This seems positive too:


View attachment 18468


Who hasn't been maintaining the drainage ditch and culvert? OCC/CDC/KPC?
Click to expand...
Or as FoSB described the site "it acts as sink for surface water and prevents the area from flooding" or words to that effect.

No it doesn't Suzanne, it acts like a sink because someone's not unblocked the drain.

It's going to be entertaining reading all of their arguments being dismantled by professionals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
  • Locked
General New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Land Deal
722 723 724
Replies
14K
Views
926K
Northstandboy
Northstandboy
brightonyellow
  • Locked
General New Stadium Plans - Stratfield Brake
304 305 306
Replies
6K
Views
413K
ljs
L
MarkG
What will happen to the Kassam stadium?
2
Replies
29
Views
1K
stokeu
stokeu
OUSP
Call to Action Stadium Planning
Replies
4
Views
612
OUSP
OUSP
OUFCwaffle
Study: New stadium location of safe standing model.
Replies
14
Views
1K
ljs
L
Back
Top Bottom