- Joined
- 5 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 8,595
Exactly. Hardly screams competence does it? It’s astonishing for two reasons:They said they’re not addressing the assistant manager/coach situation until the summer/end of season.
And that's the fault of Des?
Even more reason for Tim and Grant to pull their finger out, or hire a DoF to do it for them.
I’ve liked this post because you managed to list some good arguments to support Buckingham and avoid using the f*****g ‘he’s one of our own’ oneI really want Des to succeed, and understand the concerns raised about a lack of a clear plan and playing as a cohesive unit.
Let's be honest, when Manning was still here, I doubt many of us really believed the league table with Oxford in second was a true reflection. Results were patchy and had that feeling of one step forward (Derby, Barnsley) and one step back (Cambridge, Port Vale, MKD, Wigan). I suspect many of us suspected things would settle down and the bigger clubs would nudge their way past us.
Whilst Manning was here, the only significant injury was Browne. Right now, we have 11 first-teamers out, plus lost Beadle and Mills.
To say Des must go is for the birds. Firstly, it would be wholly unfair on him considering the hand he has been dealt (injuries, lack of backroom team, confusion with the board). And secondly, the money spent on bringing him here, and the inaction from the board regarding KR's dismissal, demonstrates we have to accept Des Buckingham is here for the long haul.
I would go further and say, we are nowhere near ready for promotion. We'd come tumbling straight back down. (Shef Wed, Blackpool). We need to build a squad and an identity for the long-term, right now, the club is not ready for the Championship.
Yes, this season does feel like a great opportunity being missed. But blaming Des Buckingham is not right, nor fair. Look how weak our bench was on Tuesday, we really are down to the bare bones.
So my questions are...
Personally, I have written off this season. We ain't going to get promoted, and we certainly are not ready for promotion either. Top 30 club? Not a chance with our current senior execs.
- Why are we suffering so many injuries?
Is our squad size limiting the chance of rotation causing us to 'overplay' our players?
Why do we sign so many 'fragile' players?
- Why has the board not appointed a proper Assistant Manager?
- What on earth is going on with the Analyst position?
- Does an OUFC manager have any say in recruitment? or is this solely the fiefdom of Ed Waldron?
Does anyone but the club use that term?I’ve liked this post because you managed to list some good arguments to support Buckingham and avoid using the f*****g ‘he’s one of our own’ one
Are they leaving of their own accord, Ryan?It isn’t just the assistant and analyst situation that Buckingham has had to put up with. Harry Routledge has been gone as HoP for a while and I believe his replacement has either just started in the last few days, or is about to start any day now. That has been dragging on for many weeks yet nobody has said a word on it. There have also been exits on the admin side including some very loyal and long serving members of staff, with more to come before the season is out.
The club is a complete shambles at the moment.
The assistant manager situation is farcical. The importance of this is dictated by the manager you choose. If we’d appointed a Gary Rowett-type and said hypothetically his normal number 2 couldn’t join him, you can understand them taking some time to go through other alternatives and trust in Rowett to hold things together in the mean time - he’s experienced enough.
But when you appoint someone essentially coming out of football’s best university, you MUST accept responsibility for putting someone next to him who can plug the inevitable knowledge gaps. With that will be some cost and anybody worth having will need persuading. This should all have been factored in as a subsequent condition of hiring Buckingham.
The fact we haven’t is just more to the pile of mounting evidence that various parts of the club are being completely neglected at the hands of a CEO that’s out of his depth.
Is it up to the board to appoint an assistant manager?Tim and Grant also have not helped Des out by the ridiculous situation around appointing an assistant manager.
I doubt he wouldn’t want the role but it wouldn’t have been a bad idea, if they weren’t going to get Des an assistant in, to put Faz in that role short term to add some experience.
Is it up to the board to appoint an assistant manager?
Des is terrible. He’s tactically inept, inspires no confidence and has absolutely no signs of a plan or style of play.
Maybe no coaches want to work for him? Does he have any contacts in this country?
I would argue that Des’ CV suggests that he must have some decent grasp of tactics. The problem seems to be conveying his ideas to the players. It’s clear something hasn’t clicked yet. Do the players trust him? Is he getting the help he needs from the coaches already established? Does he need to grow a set of cojones and be more assertive? Kick some arses..?Is it up to the board to appoint an assistant manager?
Des is terrible. He’s tactically inept, inspires no confidence and has absolutely no signs of a plan or style of play.
Maybe no coaches want to work for him? Does he have any contacts in this country?
I can only assume that most are already employed and/or settled and it's a tough time of the year to be filling such a role. Probably cling on til summer and then see who's available. This is the danger when you bring in a manger who has no staff at hand but even with Des's appointment; it was also a torrid time of the season to be filling such a critical role with the position we were in.Maybe no coaches want to work for him? Does he have any contacts in this country?
Suggest they (Des) don't/didn't want to waste any more energy on chasing this one when he felt he had enough support around for the foreseeable. It is entirely possible that this will be revisited in the close season. As for asking Faz, well am surprised he has the energy for what he does do already! Though might give Hodgson a run for his moneyI can only assume that most are already employed and/or settled and it's a tough time of the year to be filling such a role. Probably cling on til summer and then see who's available. This is the danger when you bring in a manger who has no staff at hand but even with Des's appointment; it was also a torrid time of the season to be filling such a critical role with the position we were in.
Exactly. Hardly screams competence does it? It’s astonishing for two reasons:
1. You hired a manager (at a significant cost) who was always going to need help finding one. Why hire him at all if that was something you weren’t prepared to do as you’re essentially capping his potential before he’s even arrived.
2. We are still, somehow, around the play offs with an opportunity to stay there to the end. We’ve got the players to do it and competing in a league with no outstanding sides.
Negligence/incompetence beyond comprehension.
Appleton brought in Fazackerley as he realised he needed experience alongside him. The fact that was his most successful period as a manager probably tells a story.Is the answer you're looking for Des?
Which Number 2 did Appleton, Clotet and Robinson bring in? Or does the last manger mean most to you?
Lots of people here were saying when Manning left that we shouldn't allow a new manager to bring his own team in, as they all needed replacing when Manning left.
This lies on the Chuckle Brothers. Not Des.
So is it Tim or Des who is responsible for hiring a new assistant? (Hint: It's not Des, or at least, at any other FL club, it wouldn't be Des)
I was looking to see what BC fans currently thought of Manning, and saw this comment which is pretty much identical to what I've seen about DB from us!
"I don’t think sacking LM is on the agenda - for one I don’t think the board would, and for two, what’s the point. Ignoring hyperbole, we aren’t being relegated so I’d give him the season to see if he can adapt to this level, as I really think he’s struggled - he looks like a rabbit in headlights currently"
I was looking to see what BC fans currently thought of Manning, and saw this comment which is pretty much identical to what I've seen about DB from us!
"I don’t think sacking LM is on the agenda - for one I don’t think the board would, and for two, what’s the point. Ignoring hyperbole, we aren’t being relegated so I’d give him the season to see if he can adapt to this level, as I really think he’s struggled - he looks like a rabbit in headlights currently"
But still goes to show that taking over another manager's team in the middle of the season isn't straightforward.Bristol city weren't second in the league when Manning took over them. Big difference there.