It isn’t just the assistant and analyst situation that Buckingham has had to put up with. Harry Routledge has been gone as HoP for a while and I believe his replacement has either just started in the last few days, or is about to start any day now. That has been dragging on for many weeks yet nobody has said a word on it. There have also been exits on the admin side including some very loyal and long serving members of staff, with more to come before the season is out.
The club is a complete shambles at the moment.
This is the jist of what I said below last week.
He certainly hasn't been. Manning had Hogg as a trusted right hand man, we spent months chasing people, offering them pay cuts and getting turned down before just sort-of-but-not-really giving it to Hackett. The way it was announced was a giveaway that it wasn't our first choice and we were about 10 games into Des' reign by then.
Another member of the backroom staff also left around the time Des came in but he still appears on the website and I've seen no notification that he's gone. I suspect when the new guy is in next week we'll see a "he replaces x with immediate effect, we thank x for his services" message from the club as if he's been here the whole time and we've not been another man down while Des is trying to fill those roles and manage the team. I've not seen much of a plan on the pitch under him but he's been stitched up by a board who are either absent or not up to it.
As you say, Routledge has been gone since late November/early December. His replacement was all agreed and was ready to be on the bench last year but Tim never sorted it (Des did most the chasing himself) and now won't be starting until this week. This is troubling on a few fronts.
1) The complete lack of urgency to get some help for Buckingham, despite having someone qualified and ready to go well over a month ago.
2) The fact it was left to the manager to sort out, at a time when we had loads of injuries, games coming thick and fast and we hadn't sorted out any other backroom staff for him (in particular, see assistant manager)
3) No mention at all that a senior member of staff has left. As of 5:30pm on Sunday 4th Feb his name is on the club website so unless you knew about it you'd not even have any suspicion that we're a staff member down.
In all scenarios, the obvious question if you've got an open mind is "if that's the case, what else is happening?" Buckingham having to chase up senior management to appoint staff who want to come here is bad enough, what's to say that wasn't the case with an assistant as well, or any of the other staff Ryan mentioned? Put that together with the two month search for an assistant and it all fits with a board who are out of their depth, not working hard enough or both. Regarding them not mentioning anything about outgoing staff, unfortunately incompetence is the
best case scenario here. Just as likely is that they know it won't be well received so won't bother telling us, either because they don't want the hassle or they simply have too much contempt for us. How's planning permission for the new stadium going, that's crucial to our very existence? Still looking at being submitted November 2023? Or is there actually a chance it won't be ready and maybe we might have to groundshare? Was that announced at a forum, website update or an open letter to fans? Nah, just mention it offhand in an Athletic article and see if the plebs pick up on it.
I took some stick for suggesting we'd offered people paycuts to join as assistant and didn't want to say too much more. To be fair I don't expect to put some pretty outrageous claims on and be believed just like that, even with the context of the Hackett is-he-isnt-he fiasco in the background. That said, if the other part of my quoted post turns out to be true then I'd hope those posters will also have an open enough mind to consider the rest of it might be as well. I won't say who but it was the same person who told me all this information at the same time and was pretty astounded themselves. I don't see it as particularly likely they'd have said something so specific and then completely fabricated the rest.
Buckingham has ultimately been set up to fail by the cowboys in charge. Comparisons with Manning aren't fair, even if we were second or third when he left most can see we were slightly fortunate to be there, were scoring more than our play would suggest, had few injuries and avoided playing a lot of the top teams. More importantly though he was allowed to arrive mob handed with a trusted assistant, analyst and coaches so he could stamp his authority on it. I don't like the story at all of how he allegedly treated Wayne Brown but he was able to be ruthless and give himself some authority. Buckingham has come highly regarded but relatively unknown and walked into a bit of a old boys club with Short's stock very high and was given no back up at all. Not a dig at Short or any of the staff we have currently but it's basically Des stick, combined with a pretty crap set of circumstances he was in a hiding to nothing. Unfortunately I already think he's got an uphill battle on his hands to gain the full trust and respect of the team and if he does fail he'll have a black mark against his name when it should be at least as much on his bosses.
Tim and Grant were weak when allowing Robinson to decimate the club from the inside and then stay so long, wish washy with Manning's contract and downright incompetent throughout the entirety of Buckingham's reign so far, all with a nice undercurrent of arrogance whilst the stadium project that will keep us alive quietly runs into problems out of sight. They're very dangerous people to have running the club.