I’ve only looked at the penalty decisions but Fulham’s second penalty in injury time was 200% a clear penalty and VAR made the right decision to refer it to the referee, and he made the right decision to award it. Gary O’Neil needs to face facts - he needs to coach his defenders to defend and not concede penalties.
The Wolves defender stuck out and planted his right leg. He did not touch the ball nor did it look like he tried. The Fulham player went over his leg, possibly trying to win a penalty as he was heading away from goal.
Penalty all day long, plus it should’ve been a booking for the Wolves defender.
If that 2nd penalty is clear and obvious then the contact by the Wolves defender on the ball for the 1st is clear and obvious; there is a replay shown while he was making his decision that shows this so he will have seen it. It also wasn't dangerous. Salisbury has already confirmed he'd have changed his decision but couldn't because the VAR Official has a different interpretation.
Check the headbutt out as well as that is clear and obvious. I've seen players sent off for far less.
Attwell has treated the interpretation of 'clear and obvious' differently across those decisions. It is ridiculous.
We'll have to disagree on the 2nd penalty as the Fulham player wasn't possibly trying to win a penalty, that is exactly what he was doing and his cheating has been rewarded.