Neville60
Active member
- Joined
- 8 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 650
This is at least thought provoking. I remain sceptical for the reason that, if this lot were right in their assertions, all those who had followed a different course were wrong. That would be most governments around the world - difficult to accept.
Really interesting point of view.This is at least thought provoking. I remain sceptical for the reason that, if this lot were right in their assertions, all those who had followed a different course were wrong. That would be most governments around the world - difficult to accept.
It's interesting that they argue the point (and it is a good argument) that a lot of deaths listed as Covid-19 cause are done so erroneously. Likewise, the argument is made in support of the rise in non related death due to those people not getting the treatment/diagnostic appointments following cancellation/postponement. They talk of 200,000 deaths as a result of "lockdown" citing hospital closure, suicide and poverty.Really interesting point of view.
Some real conspiracy theories in there though.
One of things that it doesn't address is the fact that there have been 60,000 excess deaths so far. Without lockdown this would presumably have been significantly more. Are they arguing that these are just collateral damage?
While there can be value in the arguments, I would be extra vigilant about who is supporting them, and whether they have a vested interest.What is interesting and is gaining support, is the argument against lockdowns. There is an ongoing legal challenge in the UK and while this may not have a great chance of success, is raising the awareness of others to the possibility that lockdowns do more harm than good.
All too true. And a sad indictment of the world in which we live.While there can be value in the arguments, I would be extra vigilant about who is supporting them, and whether they have a vested interest.
Melbourne has shown that they work in terms turning off the tap of the virus, but the collateral effects on other health matters, esp. mental health and economy are harder to include in the equation. Beware of the rich individual with an insulated lifestyle, but with lots to benefit from ordinary folks sacrificing their family’s wellbeing to feed them ...
What is interesting and is gaining support, is the argument against lockdowns. There is an ongoing legal challenge in the UK and while this may not have a great chance of success, is raising the awareness of others to the possibility that lockdowns do more harm than good.
Also realise that the avowed goal of the New World Order Satanists is massive global depopulation – the murder of millions of the world’s people – to cull the herd to a manageable level (with them of course on top.)
This is why I am calling for the establishment of Vaccine Injury Prayer Clinics across the land. The best place for these would be in our churches. But the Satanists may not allow churches to reopen and begin operating in any substantial way. So we will have to use our ingenuity to work around this to get the job done
If necessary, buy yourself a processional cross on the internet (searchrocessional cross) and set up a table or a tent in a parking lot or in a field. Make a sign that says “Vaccine Injury Prayer Clinic” and God will send needy people to you for ministry. You won’t have to advertise. Word will spread like wildfire.
It will also attract enraged demonic opposition. So we are going to need to know how to wage spiritual warfare, to ask God to send angels of the Lord to provide the protection needed for the ministry to proceed.