New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Planning

It’s a weird planning objection, you don’t want it built near but also it’s too small, so you would be ok if we built a bigger stadium? Just another example of the mess of arguments and hat are put against it. They should just be honest and say they don’t want anything built near them.
 
Billyox said:
View attachment 18429
Click to expand...

One person who keeps saying 'tHe SiTe Is ToO sMaLl' is Ian Middleton. I reckon his pontifications on Nextdoor are getting through to people, hence why a load of B*****s is ended up being posted to the portal.

Of course, CDC can happily ignore it but there remains a hearts and minds aspect to this. We cannot let the antis lie on social media and get into people's heads with the idea that the site is too small, fans won't travel by public transport and that we can stay at the Kassam Stadium. Anything we can do to challenge these false assumptions, we should do.

The club should remain laser focussed on the greater goal but as fans if we can bat away the misinformation in a measured way, we can make the club's route to getting the stadium approved easier.
 
Are these the same people who did not want it on Stratfeild Brake? If so why did they force OCC to offer the triangle as an alternative based n the failure of Kidlington Parish Council to see the massive financial benefit to their community in releasing them from a massive financial noose around their necks.
 
unification said:
One person who keeps saying 'tHe SiTe Is ToO sMaLl' is Ian Middleton. I reckon his pontifications on Nextdoor are getting through to people, hence why a load of B*****s is ended up being posted to the portal.

Of course, CDC can happily ignore it but there remains a hearts and minds aspect to this. We cannot let the antis lie on social media and get into people's heads with the idea that the site is too small, fans won't travel by public transport and that we can stay at the Kassam Stadium. Anything we can do to challenge these false assumptions, we should do.

The club should remain laser focussed on the greater goal but as fans if we can bat away the misinformation in a measured way, we can make the club's route to getting the stadium approved easier.
Click to expand...
You know what it proves tho that because it's only Ian who says the site is too small that he is clearly part of fosb for all these people to keep mentioning it on there objection
 
Billyox said:
You know what it proves tho that because it's only Ian who says the site is too small that he is clearly part of fosb for all these people to keep mentioning it on there objection
Click to expand...

A bigger stadium was built on a smaller site design BY THE SAME ARCHITECTS!

FFS, they made go capital 😡
 
Oxymoron said:
Question: Why is the Lathbury Road Residents’ Association so concerned about traffic on a site over two miles from their location and in a direction which they are unlikely to travel......
Click to expand...
does Suzanne McIvor represent them too? ( she appears to spearhead most if not all protest/ pressure groups across Oxford and beyond)
 
Oxymoron said:
Question: Why is the Lathbury Road Residents’ Association so concerned about traffic on a site over two miles from their location and in a direction which they are unlikely to travel......
Click to expand...

Because they'd prefer us hairy arsed, knuckle dragging, garden pissing neanderthals outside of a 5 mile radius.

I doubt Kidlington residents past The Broadway will be aware there's a game on let alone Lathbury Road. That's just them trying to prove they're superior than football, OUFC and football fans.
 
Last edited:
Oxymoron said:
Question: Why is the Lathbury Road Residents’ Association so concerned about traffic on a site over two miles from their location and in a direction which they are unlikely to travel......
Click to expand...
Lathbury Road isn't even North Oxford, one of my customers lives around there and said they are just busybodies that enjoy opposing everything
 
hopefully ian notices my post on next door and this shuts him up

When considering the spatial requirements for Oxford United Football Club's proposed stadium, it's essential to look at comparable projects to understand what can be achieved within a given area. Brentford Football Club provides an excellent case study with their new stadium, which has a capacity of 17,250 seats and was constructed on a plot of 7.6 acres.The Triangle, the proposed site for OUFC's stadium, spans 11.94 acres, significantly larger than Brentford's plot. The shape of the site, while triangular, is not a limiting factor. AFL Architects, the firm that designed Brentford's stadium, are now collaborating with OUFC. Their expertise and successful track record in developing quality stadiums on uniquely shaped sites are invaluable assets.AFL Architects' involvement with OUFC is a promising sign that the spatial challenges posed by The Triangle can be effectively navigated to deliver a stadium that meets the needs of fans and players alike. The comparison with Brentford's stadium demonstrates that not only is the project feasible, but there is also room to innovate and perhaps create a venue that stands out in terms of design and functionality.In conclusion, The Triangle's size and shape do not pose insurmountable obstacles for OUFC's stadium development. With proven architectural prowess and a larger site at their disposal, OUFC has the potential to realize their vision for a new home ground that could very well become a landmark for the community.
 
Billyox said:
hopefully ian notices my post on next door and this shuts him up

When considering the spatial requirements for Oxford United Football Club's proposed stadium, it's essential to look at comparable projects to understand what can be achieved within a given area. Brentford Football Club provides an excellent case study with their new stadium, which has a capacity of 17,250 seats and was constructed on a plot of 7.6 acres.The Triangle, the proposed site for OUFC's stadium, spans 11.94 acres, significantly larger than Brentford's plot. The shape of the site, while triangular, is not a limiting factor. AFL Architects, the firm that designed Brentford's stadium, are now collaborating with OUFC. Their expertise and successful track record in developing quality stadiums on uniquely shaped sites are invaluable assets.AFL Architects' involvement with OUFC is a promising sign that the spatial challenges posed by The Triangle can be effectively navigated to deliver a stadium that meets the needs of fans and players alike. The comparison with Brentford's stadium demonstrates that not only is the project feasible, but there is also room to innovate and perhaps create a venue that stands out in terms of design and functionality.In conclusion, The Triangle's size and shape do not pose insurmountable obstacles for OUFC's stadium development. With proven architectural prowess and a larger site at their disposal, OUFC has the potential to realize their vision for a new home ground that could very well become a landmark for the community.
Click to expand...
Great point to add to supportive comments it's been done and the architects with the experience and proven track record of delivering a stadium on a small triangular site are involved here. Also Erick Thohir has a proven track record of getting a stadium built for DC United.
 
Billyox said:
hopefully ian notices my post on next door and this shuts him up

When considering the spatial requirements for Oxford United Football Club's proposed stadium, it's essential to look at comparable projects to understand what can be achieved within a given area. Brentford Football Club provides an excellent case study with their new stadium, which has a capacity of 17,250 seats and was constructed on a plot of 7.6 acres.The Triangle, the proposed site for OUFC's stadium, spans 11.94 acres, significantly larger than Brentford's plot. The shape of the site, while triangular, is not a limiting factor. AFL Architects, the firm that designed Brentford's stadium, are now collaborating with OUFC. Their expertise and successful track record in developing quality stadiums on uniquely shaped sites are invaluable assets.AFL Architects' involvement with OUFC is a promising sign that the spatial challenges posed by The Triangle can be effectively navigated to deliver a stadium that meets the needs of fans and players alike. The comparison with Brentford's stadium demonstrates that not only is the project feasible, but there is also room to innovate and perhaps create a venue that stands out in terms of design and functionality.In conclusion, The Triangle's size and shape do not pose insurmountable obstacles for OUFC's stadium development. With proven architectural prowess and a larger site at their disposal, OUFC has the potential to realize their vision for a new home ground that could very well become a landmark for the community.
Click to expand...
Or to put it more succinctly... Look at the f*******g plans in the submitted planning documents!
 
Billyox said:
hopefully ian notices my post on next door and this shuts him up

When considering the spatial requirements for Oxford United Football Club's proposed stadium, it's essential to look at comparable projects to understand what can be achieved within a given area. Brentford Football Club provides an excellent case study with their new stadium, which has a capacity of 17,250 seats and was constructed on a plot of 7.6 acres.The Triangle, the proposed site for OUFC's stadium, spans 11.94 acres, significantly larger than Brentford's plot. The shape of the site, while triangular, is not a limiting factor. AFL Architects, the firm that designed Brentford's stadium, are now collaborating with OUFC. Their expertise and successful track record in developing quality stadiums on uniquely shaped sites are invaluable assets.AFL Architects' involvement with OUFC is a promising sign that the spatial challenges posed by The Triangle can be effectively navigated to deliver a stadium that meets the needs of fans and players alike. The comparison with Brentford's stadium demonstrates that not only is the project feasible, but there is also room to innovate and perhaps create a venue that stands out in terms of design and functionality.In conclusion, The Triangle's size and shape do not pose insurmountable obstacles for OUFC's stadium development. With proven architectural prowess and a larger site at their disposal, OUFC has the potential to realize their vision for a new home ground that could very well become a landmark for the community.
Click to expand...
didnt take long for ian to bite

Screenshot (60).pngclearly ian misses the point it says with parking Screenshot (61).png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
  • Locked
General New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Land Deal
722 723 724
Replies
14K
Views
924K
Northstandboy
Northstandboy
brightonyellow
  • Locked
General New Stadium Plans - Stratfield Brake
304 305 306
Replies
6K
Views
412K
ljs
L
MarkG
What will happen to the Kassam stadium?
2
Replies
23
Views
731
WarwickOx
WarwickOx
OUSP
Call to Action Stadium Planning
Replies
4
Views
543
OUSP
OUSP
OUFCwaffle
Study: New stadium location of safe standing model.
Replies
14
Views
1K
ljs
L
Back
Top Bottom