...about this current off field chaos?
About as much as our favourite asset stripping hotdog vendor & our newly installed Dear Leader combined: Fcuk All! Somebody just sort it out FFS
I have to admit that I thought Jem had mentioned a meeting and repeated that myself - so apologies if I have fueled that rumour.For clarity, there was no OxVox committee meeting last Friday, there never was, so no idea where that came from?
As for the rest, I think you'll find most of the committee are like me, fed up to the back teeth of every single word they post being poured over, twisted, and even deleted by the moderators when certain people complain.
Some might say it comes with the territory, but the twisting of the truth and claims of a personality cult etc etc etc make some people wonder why they bother to give their time up to help some of these people.
Be careful what you wish for..........
I have to admit that I thought Jem had mentioned a meeting and repeated that myself - so apologies if I have fueled that rumour.
However, I agree entirely with your post and your frustrations at the rubbish being thrown at OxVox. A few idiots with their own sad agendas are trying to create a division that is simply not there as far as I can see.
Surely that doesn't matter? You have said (a couple of days ago) that the squad is too good to go down, and (repeatedly) told us that talk of relegation was ridiculous. So why not wait until the best possible candidate is available? We will be in L1 next year and can rebuild over the summer with an excellent manager in place...We are rapidly becoming the laughing stock of the EFL. You talk about ‘patience’ Mr Burrett but we have now been without a manager for 50 DAYS.
Hear, hear.For clarity, there was no OxVox committee meeting last Friday, there never was, so no idea where that came from?
As for the rest, I think you'll find most of the committee are like me, fed up to the back teeth of every single word they post being poured over, twisted, and even deleted by the moderators when certain people complain.
Some might say it comes with the territory, but the twisting of the truth and claims of a personality cult etc etc etc make some people wonder why they bother to give their time up to help some of these people.
Be careful what you wish for..........
For clarity, there was no OxVox committee meeting last Friday, there never was, so no idea where that came from?
As for the rest, I think you'll find most of the committee are like me, fed up to the back teeth of every single word they post being poured over, twisted, and even deleted by the moderators when certain people complain.
Some might say it comes with the territory, but the twisting of the truth and claims of a personality cult etc etc etc make some people wonder why they bother to give their time up to help some of these people.
Be careful what you wish for..........
Credit where it’s due, that a good and reassuring update.
Credit where it’s due, that a good and reassuring update.
Surely that doesn't matter? You have said (a couple of days ago) that the squad is too good to go down, and (repeatedly) told us that talk of relegation was ridiculous. So why not wait until the best possible candidate is available? We will be in L1 next year and can rebuild over the summer with an excellent manager in place...
I've been mulling this point over for the past couple of days, and I think it's the perceived lack of proactivity which has irked me the most.What's the proverb?
Proactive as opposed to reactive?
I've been mulling this point over for the past couple of days, and I think it's the perceived lack of proactivity which has irked me the most.
It's been over 4 months since OxVox met with Tiger and some of the questions which they are now "pushing hard" on should be really simple ones for an owner to answer - all the stuff around their plans and visions for the club are the sort of Day One items which should be capable of being answered before they even have a foot in the door. If OxVox haven't been able to extract those sort of basic answers, then IMHO this should've been flagged up much earlier.
So, yes, I'm pleased to see confirmation that OxVox are following up on the issues which many on this forum have raised. The issue now is, what is the timescale being set for them to get answers to these questions? Tiger has had four months to put some flesh on the bones, but none appears to have been forthcoming. So, how long does he have?
There is a real quandary in all of this, is this a Thai thing? Is Tiger just unused to having his business questioned? Surely with the experience of Reading FC he should know that the fans will want to know his plans? On the other hand, the only sound bites we have had are very similar to those handed out during his tenure at Reading. (some are identical - insert "Oxford" for "Reading") All of which serve only to frustrate.
Encouraging is the (perceived) increase in media activity, the academy plans and training ground movement. Although all of those have yet to come to fruition, there is something which shows a glimmer of planning.
I really hope that OxVox are acting with intent and not just facilitating to curry favour.
There is a real quandary in all of this, is this a Thai thing? Is Tiger just unused to having his business questioned? Surely with the experience of Reading FC he should know that the fans will want to know his plans? On the other hand, the only sound bites we have had are very similar to those handed out during his tenure at Reading. (some are identical - insert "Oxford" for "Reading") All of which serve only to frustrate.
Encouraging is the (perceived) increase in media activity, the academy plans and training ground movement. Although all of those have yet to come to fruition, there is something which shows a glimmer of planning.
I really hope that OxVox are acting with intent and not just facilitating to curry favour.
To be honest, I am very much for giving Tiger "time" before judging him. He has been found the club in a helluva mess, across all areas, and he cannot be blamed for his predecessor's failings and peccadilloes.
But I am not for giving him time before he is required to answer basic questions that the vast majority of new owners answer proudly on their way into whichever club they are buying. He was (apparently) asked these questions in November, but did not answer them then, did not answer them at his opening press conference and still has not answered them now. These are not complex matters. If he is the real deal then they are one or two line email answers jotted down in 10 minutes in the airport.
On to the role of OxVox. I do not agree with Gary Baldi that they have struck a good balance in their dealings with DE and Tiger. The club is in a far worse state, structurally and performance wise, than it was a year and indeed two years ago. This has happened as a result of a series of decisions that they knew about, and did not question.
Ah. Sorry. That is not quite true. They may have questioned them privately. But not publicly. As a result, the powers that be can simply bully onwards and do what they want, without fear of public reprimand. With big clubs, this role - public questioning of power - is mostly played by the media. But at smaller clubs, with a supine local media monopoly who rely on the club for their lifeblood, it falls to the Trust to hold lightly over the protagonists' heads the threat of a public row. The knowledge that the Trust can/ might do that is what breeds genuine respect. Cowed silence breeds disrespect (hence the disgraceful way that DE hectored OxVox over the stadium situation a year ago).
It is not the role of the Trust to be "close" to the club, but to protect the club's sustainability. If anyone can point out how OxVox's actions have achieved that then I would be grateful.
Finally, a point on the plaintive plea that because they are volunteers who give time to help the club for free then they should be above criticism. I can say, with absolute certainty, that over the last 10 years I have given more time voluntarily to the club than anyone on the OxVox committee. Odd that the committee's protectors do not seem to think that that voluntary service places me - or Myles - above criticism.... Strong organisations are happy to explain and defend their decisions. It is only weak entities that shy like a scalded cat when criticised.