Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure I agree with the 'Hull v Plymouth - draw' consensus.
If we're really in the mix it's all about minimal points for the current bottom 3 above all else.
Even if Hull were to lose to Plymouth, they could still (easily) be within two points of us (with better GD) if they beat us next week.
Whereas Plymouth (effectively 9 points off us with GD) can continue to eek their way towards us with a point, but a defeat is another game gone with no progress.
It's on us to sort out our own form of course, but if we're genuinely nervous on that score then we have to hope that Plymouth, Luton and Derby continue to lose - even if that means we're overhauled by the likes of Cardiff, Stoke and Hull.
For the avoidance of any doubt, I'd like to finish as high as possible. I think the optics for looking back on this season, and for potential recruitment this summer, are far better for finishing 18th vs finishing 21st.
That said, the reason for my thinking above is best understood with a couple of hypothetical scenarios. In both, we finish with a points tally of, say, 44 points (plausible).
In scenario 1, the likes of Hull are beating the likes of Plymouth. They sail past us, and maybe even make 50 points. However, the current bottom 3 struggle to get to 40 points, let alone the mid-40s. Safe.
In scenario 2, the likes of Hull drop points to the likes of Plymouth. One of the bottom three (it only needs one, remember) pull out 4 or 5 wins from their remaining games. The season ends with as many as half a dozen sides failing to get to 50 points, but we go down.
Now I may be scarred by 2006 here, but I recall us sleep walking to relegation. We weren't horrific (in relative terms). It was a perfect combination of dropping sloppy points whilst others sorted their act out.
Don't get me wrong, the best way for us to stay up is to sort ourselves out and win some games, maybe even get to 50 points - and finish as high as possible.
But the second best way is for the most horrific sides to continue to be just that.
Great post. 2006 was complacency, pure and simple. Those below us were just too bad. We had Jim Smith.For the avoidance of any doubt, I'd like to finish as high as possible. I think the optics for looking back on this season, and for potential recruitment this summer, are far better for finishing 18th vs finishing 21st.
That said, the reason for my thinking above is best understood with a couple of hypothetical scenarios. In both, we finish with a points tally of, say, 44 points (plausible).
In scenario 1, the likes of Hull are beating the likes of Plymouth. They sail past us, and maybe even make 50 points. However, the current bottom 3 struggle to get to 40 points, let alone the mid-40s. Safe.
In scenario 2, the likes of Hull drop points to the likes of Plymouth. One of the bottom three (it only needs one, remember) pull out 4 or 5 wins from their remaining games. The season ends with as many as half a dozen sides failing to get to 50 points, but we go down.
Now I may be scarred by 2006 here, but I recall us sleep walking to relegation. We weren't horrific (in relative terms). It was a perfect combination of dropping sloppy points whilst others sorted their act out.
Don't get me wrong, the best way for us to stay up is to sort ourselves out and win some games, maybe even get to 50 points - and finish as high as possible.
But the second best way is for the most horrific sides to continue to be just that.
Cardiff 1- 2 Burnley.
Hull v Plymouth is a bloody hard watch. Terrible.
Makes you realise how bad these two are .Hull v Plymouth is a bloody hard watch. Terrible.
How the hell did Hull beat Sheffield United 3-0 at Bramall Lane just a month ago?!Hull v Plymouth is a bloody hard watch. Terrible.
It reminds me of our game at Derby -Makes you realise how bad these two are .
Surely we are better