It was before the end of the season I believe.
It would be good to hear from Oxvox what is happening?
My susicion is that Tiger isnt bothered like DE when he turned up.
As Oxvox wanted to but it as a community asset regardless of the owner, I am also guessing that it is the Landlords way of putting everything in hold again as he doesnt want to sell.
We will follow it up with tiger for an update.
RichmanModern day Rachman!
Anything involving 'our ' slum landlord seems to attract disputes......apparantly Oxford city council are ,albeit seemingly toothlessly, are in legal dispute with him over requirements for the priory .....with the slum landlord tax exiled in Monaco he ignores and laughs in the face of any legal disputes from afar, it appears to me that he thinks he's above the laws of England and Wales. A 21st c untouchable perhaps?FFS how many legal issues is the stadium facing? Having read the OM report this bit was interesting:-
Greenfields had been employed by the stadium company, who are responsible for the upkeep of the pitch under the terms of their agreement with Oxford United.
But Michael Doyle, general manager of the Kassam Stadium, said they were unable to comment on the change due to ongoing legal issues, with Greenfields stating they were also not in a position to say anything.
It’s good to know that the club is not alone when stadium issues end up on the legal route.
Anything involving 'our ' slum landlord seems to attract disputes......apparantly Oxford city council are ,albeit seemingly toothlessly, are in legal dispute with him over requirements for the priory .....with the slum landlord tax exiled in Monaco he ignores and laughs in the face of any legal disputes from afar, it appears to me that he thinks he's above the laws of England and Wales. A 21st c untouchable perhaps?
Make him sit for the duration of a match in his breeze block 3 standed erection, now that would freeze all his 'assets'Freeze his assets
Anything involving 'our ' slum landlord seems to attract disputes......apparantly Oxford city council are ,albeit seemingly toothlessly, are in legal dispute with him over requirements for the priory .....with the slum landlord tax exiled in Monaco he ignores and laughs in the face of any legal disputes from afar, it appears to me that he thinks he's above the laws of England and Wales. A 21st c untouchable perhaps?
Agreed oxford city council SHOULD do that (shouldve done that sometime ago too).....sadly, for reasons best known to oxford city council, they havent and very likely wontThey should revoke the right for the hotel to be open as planning permission hasn't been met and start proceedings to get it knocked down. That would concentrate his mind.
Agreed oxford city council SHOULD do that (shouldve done that sometime ago too).....sadly, for reasons best known to oxford city council, they havent and very likely wont
We live in hope . ..(a given as OUFC supporters)You definitely get the feeling it’s all coming to a head. Something’s got to give very soon..
I think a couple on here who have posted have looked into the Priory situation and the legalities surrounding it?They should revoke the right for the hotel to be open as planning permission hasn't been met and start proceedings to get it knocked down. That would concentrate his mind.