Yes, good report in the Oxford Mail. The following paragraph hits the nail on the head:
While there have been areas of progress, it has been a period remembered for vague promises, winding-up petitions and too few victories. It is a toxic concoction which has given rise to the feeling of a club drifting away from its fanbase, almost unrecognisable from the upwardly mobile outfit from just a couple of years ago.
So yesterday I was getting concerned about the apparent censorship of views around OUFC. It seemed the local media was being 'got at', but it's now apparent that the Oxford Mail, at least, is maintaining its independence.
There was also a suggestion that a poster on here was 'warned' not to be too negative on the forum as the club read posts. Seems this was harmless advice rather than any sort of gagging attempt. Happy to put that right.
So two censorship issues at least partially resolved, but we still await the minutes from the OxVox committee meeting of Tuesday night (I think it was). Hopefully those minutes will expose any attempt by OUFC to stop committee members commenting freely, or confirm there was no such attempt.