- Season Ticket
- No
- Stand
- North (Non-Family)
- Year of First Game
- 1980
Totally agree @Foley those 42 days waiting to see if FoSB were going to put in for a JR dragged by especially as they( mistakenly)left it until day 42 and now we may have a similar wait to see what the judge decides. Plus the anguish of us fighting for survival.Ah ok thank you.
Time goes slowly .....
Its highly unlikely that anything will be made public until afterwards unless its leaked out
I will give them a bell on possibly tomorrow more likely Friday and see what information I can get out of them
The paper doesn't ask anyone anything. They have "bots" that crawl the web and pull text from sites. If there are sufficient similar hits, then software will craft an article containing "quotes" lifted from the Internet.they ask Middleton for comments on the Stadium he can't help him self so makes he's usual daft comments
You counted?
I gave them a call not much to say as I thought
Claimant friends of stratfield brake
Defendant cherwell district council
Interested Parties oxford united and Oxfordshire County Council
Awaiting acknowledgement of service
It was filed 9th April at 12:59
In the words of the gentleman on the phone "they were pushing it wasn't they"
Ian Middleton is one of those weak clowns who hide behind publications where they can make statements of nonsense and not be held directly to account. He would never participate in a local debate especially against the stadium because he knows he will be torn to shreds and humiliated. Virtually every comment he made on OM articles were nuked by Newsquest mods alone for sheer disinformation but baseline articles is what gives them clicks so those typically stick even if riddled with lies. Sadly clicks over credibility is what keeps these media rags in business and the likes of Middleton is able to prey on such things because his utter drivel tends to generate county-wide backlash.Makes you wonder why IM isn't complaining himself here if this really is just some auto-generated piece pulled together from various sources? He's getting dogs abuse in the comments sections seemingly because the OM know creating a contentious article with his name on it around this subject will get them clicks/engagement.
I'm sure he's more than happy with the exposure and notoriety, but it's a pretty shoddy business model.
All Oxford Star, Oxford journal & Oxford Courier I think Oxford Mail owned them all...
No doubt Middleton is scouting the electoral register for the names of those who have left comments he doesn't like. He's got form, rememberMakes you wonder why IM isn't complaining himself here if this really is just some auto-generated piece pulled together from various sources? He's getting dogs abuse in the comments sections seemingly because the OM know creating a contentious article with his name on it around this subject will get them clicks/engagement.
I'm sure he's more than happy with the exposure and notoriety, but it's a pretty shoddy business model.
serial purveyor of mistruths, partner of FoSB 'expert' ecologist Dr Judy Webb , spouts more drivel in the letterspage of the local rag, is anyone surprised?
Surely a professional, upstanding councillor would resort to doing something like that? Otherwise they would be kicked out, wouldn’t they?No doubt Middleton is scouting the electoral register for the names of those who have left comments he doesn't like. He's got form, remember
Environmental Law Foundation have been advising FoSB throughout this processcan someone please explain the issue with Ian and Fiona (his wife) supporting Amanda Carpenter and her connection with Environmental Law Foundation/impending election?
You'd think so wouldn't you?Surely a professional, upstanding councillor would resort to doing something like that? Otherwise they would be kicked out, wouldn’t they?
Might well be completely innocent and a complete coincidence that fosb used environmental law foundation(ELF) to give them legal advice and a trustee of ELF just happens to live local(ish) and know ian middleton and fiona mawson who are absolutely no way anything to do with fosb just a complete accidentcan someone please explain the issue with Ian and Fiona (his wife) supporting Amanda Carpenter and her connection with Environmental Law Foundation/impending election?
Amanda Carpenter has donated to Fiona Mawson's GoFundMe page tooMight well be completely innocent and a complete coincidence that fosb used environmental law foundation(ELF) to give them legal advice and a trustee of ELF just happens to live local(ish) and know ian middleton and fiona mawson who are absolutely no way anything to do with fosb just a complete accident
Environmental Law Foundation have been advising FoSB throughout this process
Amanda Carpenter isn't just connected to ELF, she's a trustee.
ELF are a charity. FoSB have shown from recent fundraising that they can easily get access to funds and were not, in fact, destitute and in need of charity. The connection between the people makes the charity's supporting of FoSB look suspicious and corrupt.can someone please explain the issue with Ian and Fiona (his wife) supporting Amanda Carpenter and her connection with Environmental Law Foundation/impending election?
Sorry, but I’m still missing what the issue is?Environmental Law Foundation have been advising FoSB throughout this process
Amanda Carpenter isn't just connected to ELF, she's a trustee.
Might well be completely innocent and a complete coincidence that fosb used environmental law foundation(ELF) to give them legal advice and a trustee of ELF just happens to live local(ish) and know ian middleton and fiona mawson who are absolutely no way anything to do with fosb just a complete accident
its all rather incestuousAmanda Carpenter has donated to Fiona Mawson's GoFundMe page too
It's basically that. They've been claiming they aren't anything to do with FoSB yet heres a pretty glaring linkIs it that Ian and Fiona portray that they are not connected to FoSB (which we obviously know they are)?
Matt Simpson is rattled
Yep just look at his profileAnother kid journalist who hasn't a clue and is visibly rattled. The funniest thing was all the biased reporting that was done by the Oxford Mail in the past three years was primarily about things that were overwhelmingly rejected, or outed as lies which proved the fans right and saw the stadium near-unanimously approved. There was next to no stories about the positive aspects of the project despite so many being identified, from community, to commercial, environmental and charity.
If journalism wasn't in the gutter nationally and this was 10+ years ago, the paper would be expected to make a formal apology for peddling such nonsense but as it's all about clicks over credibility, it's brushed under the carpet.