your first post to me you said you had been reading Nextdoor and Facebook and that the “pictures being painted” suggested there was strong opposition to the stadium relocation.
That wording is exactly why a few of us think you might be a bit of a ringer in this debate.
You didn’t reference the planning documents, the committee debate, the consultation responses, or the actual decision notice. Instead you referenced the narrative being pushed on social media. Anyone who has followed this issue closely knows that the loudest messaging on those platforms has largely come from a small number of very active campaign groups.
You also repeated a number of familiar talking points almost word for word. The idea that there is widespread opposition, the references to FoSB and Land Behind the Moors, and the suggestion the council is somehow at loggerheads with residents. Those are the same themes that have been pushed repeatedly by the organised opposition.
Then rather than challenge anything I had actually written, you finished by suggesting I “have issues” with those groups. That reads less like someone looking for a genuine discussion and more like someone trying to frame the person they’re replying to.
So when someone arrives repeating the exact same social media talking points and framing the conversation in that way, it is not unreasonable for people to question whether they are just another voice from the same campaign ecosystem.