New Stadium The Triangle - Planning (S106 Agreed)

Last edited by a moderator:
Emilio said:
I happen to have one in my hand right now - perhaps I should send it over to them? Happy to pay for priority international postage to get this done. I wonder whether the S106 would actually get signed by the time my pen gets there from Sweden?
Click to expand...
Absolutely unrelated but Sweden is such a brilliant country. Fine people.
 
I'll lay my cards out i was told Monday evening that it was done and announcement shortly, others had heard the same.
It definitely looked like it was happening yesterday
Cdc was playing around with the portal a sign that there was movement

The club was playing around releasing pre match interviews early another sign that there was movement

The dub not being released another sign

Im sure it will be done this week
 
Sarge said:
can it get any more incestuous in (the town of) Kidlington?

KGBDW, KPC ( or is that now KTC ?), KDW, LBTM, FoSB appear to be largely made up of more or less the very same protesters people? ... and Ol' Blossom is (of course) involved

Click to expand...
KDW is run by Linda Ward. She gave FoSB £250 on behalf of KDW a couple of years or so back -

1000006542.png
 
This thing of greater protection from development of greenbelt its a bit of a myth really
Kidlington parish council argued they was a town to stop the stadium because of the green belt policy says town not village.
Oufc argued that it was grey belt and cited its a village not a town.
Cdc said it was green belt not greybelt
So oufc needed vsc

By arguing that Kidlington was a town, the Parish Council inadvertently strengthened the case for the stadium's location.
Under the NPPF, major developments should be placed in "sustainable locations" with high connectivity. By highlighting Kidlington’s "town-like" amenities (the airport, the rail station, the large population), KPC actually helped the developers prove that the site was a sustainable place for a 16,000-seat stadium.
 
Billyox said:
This thing of greater protection from development of greenbelt its a bit of a myth really
Kidlington parish council argued they was a town to stop the stadium because of the green belt policy says town not village.
Oufc argued that it was grey belt and cited its a village not a town.
Cdc said it was green belt not greybelt
So oufc needed vsc

By arguing that Kidlington was a town, the Parish Council inadvertently strengthened the case for the stadium's location.
Under the NPPF, major developments should be placed in "sustainable locations" with high connectivity. By highlighting Kidlington’s "town-like" amenities (the airport, the rail station, the large population), KPC actually helped the developers prove that the site was a sustainable place for a 16,000-seat stadium.
Click to expand...
All so Middleton can wear a silly mayoral robe
 
bazzer9461 said:
It could get called in or an appeal by the developer, oh and I do hope it is and the decision gets overturned
Click to expand...
I'm sure it will be overturned on appeal, and will cost CDC taxpayers dear for the privilege of some councillors grandstanding. Roll on the appeal, the LBTM crowd are the same nimbys who opposed the stadium in the main, with a few extras
 
Frustrated Yellow said:
I'm sure it will be overturned on appeal, and will cost CDC taxpayers dear for the privilege of some councillors grandstanding. Roll on the appeal, the LBTM crowd are the same nimbys who opposed the stadium in the main, with a few extras
Click to expand...
And all those are now pro town
 
Billyox said:
They are all the same
View attachment 33748
Click to expand...

Someone needs to tell those Nimbys that being a town doesn't give you any more power to protect the green belt around you. Take Abingdon and Didcot for instance that have grown outwards considerably because of building on green belt. In actual fact building on green belt around a town is less frowned upon than it is building on green belt around a village.

Actually don’t bother telling them it will be even more laughable when more new houses are dumped on the outskirts of Kidlington in the next local plan. A town has the infrastructure to expand after all.
 
OX14 said:
Someone needs to tell those Nimbys that being a town doesn't give you any more power to protect the green belt around you. Take Abingdon and Didcot for instance that have grown outwards considerably because of building on green belt. In actual fact building on green belt around a town is less frowned upon than it is building on green belt around a village.

Actually don’t bother telling them it will be even more laughable when more new houses are dumped on the outskirts of Kidlington in the next local plan. A town has the infrastructure to expand after all.
Click to expand...
The Development Hierarchy Risk: In almost all Local Plans, "Towns" are placed higher in the settlement hierarchy than "Villages." Planning policy dictates that most new development should be directed toward the most sustainable locations—which are usually towns.
By declaring yourself a town to protect your Green Belt, you may inadvertently invite the council to allocate higher housing targets to your center because you have now "proven" you have the amenities and status to support them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar Threads

OUFCwaffle
  • Locked
  • Poll Poll
New Stadium POLL: Planning Application for The Triangle
Replies
4
Views
3K
Frustrated Yellow
Frustrated Yellow
Fanatica
Stand Names @ The Triangle
5 6 7
Replies
208
Views
13K
chuckbert
chuckbert
FAB Admin
General Triangle Campaign Info
Replies
5
Views
4K
FAB Admin
FAB Admin
BarrySpang
  • Locked
New Stadium New Stadium Plans - The Triangle - Land Deal
481 482 483
Replies
14K
Views
1M
Northstandboy
Northstandboy
Northstandboy
  • Locked
14/08/25: CDC Planning meeting - Decison time LIVE
66 67 68
Replies
2K
Views
94K
Carpy
Carpy
Back
Top Bottom