Agree with this. If we are going to be selling naming rights (and it sounds like we are) there are a few ways to do it:
1) To just call it the '[sponsor's name] stadium', like Bolton and Huddersfield did. Trouble is, when you change sponsor, there is no underlying name for the stadium, and no identity.
2) Some complicated contrivance such as St Andrews @ Knighthead Park. Just naff and quickly dated, like some Y2K rubbish.
3) To incorporate a sponsor's name and identity. I like how Shrewsbury kept the 'Meadow' aspect of their old stadium name, yet have been able to change ground sponsor over time (Greenhous Meadow, Montgomery Waters Meadow, Croud Meadow - I suspect Shrews fans just call it the Meadow).
So I vote for option 3. I hear Colin's arguments about using 'Triangle' as the identity aspect. But I just think that will seem very odd to those not itk, unless we had some actual triangle aspect to the stadium design (which we don't). And the Oxford Stadium is already taken as a name - otherwise Oxford would have made sense as the identity bit. So I would go for 'Manor' as the identifier - (eg) The BMW Manor.
I also understand Steve M's desire not to sully the memory of the original Manor by calling some modern comparative dullness by the same name. But I prefer to keep the memory alive. Up the Manor!