General Smith going back to plastics

at his request apparently?

Not massively surprising, family up north and must be a hell of a trek to and from Oxford all the time. You'd also be surprised how constant driving aggravates injuries and niggles (of which he has had a couple). Probably best for all sides.

Good luck to Sam Smith as well, never worked out here and the writing was on the wall (sorry!) early on.
 
2 chances to get worthwhile players in as replacements then, these 2 have offered b****r all for us, Smith especially after Robinson spent all summer chasing him
 
Not massively surprising, family up north and must be a hell of a trek to and from Oxford all the time. You'd also be surprised how constant driving aggravates injuries and niggles (of which he has had a couple). Probably best for all sides.

Good luck to Sam Smith as well, never worked out here and the writing was on the wall (sorry!) early on.

spot on re constant driving aggravating injuries n niggles @Berliner ...can confirm driving long distance exacerbates any strains, pains n niggles from first hand experience ( work takes me all over UK):rolleyes:
 
  • React
Reactions: Ian
Browne can go as well. Has looked actively disinterested over the last few games. Clearly had his head turned by Championship suitors. If they still want him looking at how useless he is when he doesn’t fancy it.
big time Charlie ..... if not fit/ injured why play him? ....,Browne's been, at best, a passenger the last two games, making us in effect a team of 10 men
 
one of our promising U23s.... dont think theyd be out of their depth or phased

Young James has impressed me when Ive seen U23s play
Spasov looked out of his depth today unfortunately.
I think that the criticism of Browne is unfair.
He is a young lad. Wingers are traditionally inconsistent.
He has not been totally fit recently.
 
Spasov looked out of his depth today unfortunately.
I think that the criticism of Browne is unfair.
He is a young lad. Wingers are traditionally inconsistent.
He has not been totally fit recently.
looked off the pace and uninterested on Boxing day .... similar 'performance' from Browne today too? ( I hear).... IF he was carrying an injury( foot apparently), KR should perhaps have subbed him today, though maybe he shouldn't have started the game?
 
Glad Smith has gone back - he looked too clueless for all of his technical ability. Not what we needed or need. Shame really.
 
looked off the pace and uninterested on Boxing day .... similar 'performance' from Browne today too? ( I hear).... IF he was carrying an injury( foot apparently), KR should perhaps have subbed him today, though maybe he shouldn't have started the game?
There was nothing else on the bench and Browne has undoubted ability.
Had Graham been available Browne or Whyte would not have played.
 
There was nothing else on the bench and Browne has undoubted ability.
Had Graham been available Browne or Whyte would not have played.
Holmes and Carruthers also have undoubted ability too ...theyre injured, so they dont play

KR is in charge of picking the matchday squad.... he goes to watch most U23 (&U18) games so is aware first hand of the capabilities of our prospects.... James (in U23 is an exciting young player with pace and bags of ability) wasnt selected even for the bench today
, for example.....KR n his thickie twin assistants (Derry n Faz) pick the starting team and the bench

Browne , when fit, is unquestionably a real talent and an asset too....like any other player when injured ( he sustained a foot injury boxing day )why play him when hes a passenger?... if he was capable of 15-20 min today, why not bring him off the bench as an impact sub, instead potentially compound his injury by keeping him on for the entire 95 minutes.... or maybe there is a clause that he MUST play in the loan deal?
 
Unfortunately Browne was wearing slippers instead of studs which was even more frustrating

Good riddance to Smith he offered nothing as a starter or as a sub no impact what so ever, TM poor defensively as a full back you shouldnt allow the amount of crosses he allowed to come into the box glad he going,

No need for another RB Hanson first choice now with Long & Norman 2nd/3rd choice,

As much as we need as many strikers as possible I look at us over the last 2 home & the lack of creativity in the team is obvious to see we need someone in the middle of the park to open up teams who just look put 10 behind the ball, centre back is needed aswell unless he gives Raglan a chance which I don’t see
 
I’m thankful we never agreed a price or he would be still here
I must admit I thought that when I heard he was going back. Amazing that we were trying so hard to sign him permanently over the summer when you see just how off the pace he currently is. I guess that is the difference between playing youth / U23 football and proper league stuff - the only time Smith looked a bit better was when playing in the Checkatrade against Prem youth teams. I wish him well though - lack of experience rather than lack of effort, but I have no idea how talented he may or may not be on what we saw from him.
 
Holmes and Carruthers also have undoubted ability too ...theyre injured, so they dont play

KR is in charge of picking the matchday squad.... he goes to watch most U23 (&U18) games so is aware first hand of the capabilities of our prospects.... James (in U23 is an exciting young player with pace and bags of ability) wasnt selected even for the bench today
, for example.....KR n his thickie twin assistants (Derry n Faz) pick the starting team and the bench

Browne , when fit, is unquestionably a real talent and an asset too....like any other player when injured ( he sustained a foot injury boxing day )why play him when hes a passenger?... if he was capable of 15-20 min today, why not bring him off the bench as an impact sub, instead potentially compound his injury by keeping him on for the entire 95 minutes.... or maybe there is a clause that he MUST play in the loan deal?
But there is not going to be a clause that says he has to play even if injured. He clearly wasn't fit, and in a game where Brizzle were always going to be physical and well motivated it was pointless playing him.
 
But there is not going to be a clause that says he has to play even if injured. He clearly wasn't fit, and in a game where Brizzle were always going to be physical and well motivated it was pointless playing him.
Which was kind of my point @OUFCGav .... if carrying an injury , therefore a passanger, why was Browne selected to start?, why did he play 95+ mins if injured? It made no sense
 
Back
Top Bottom