SwissYellow
Active member
- Joined
- 8 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 439
To summarise this thread and what I can figure out.....we're probably 90% likely to have a miserable few years to come supporting OUFC.
But that is mainly linked to personalities rather than this charge...To summarise this thread and what I can figure out.....we're probably 90% likely to have a miserable few years to come supporting OUFC.
To summarise this thread and what I can figure out.....we're probably 90% likely to have a miserable few years to come supporting OUFC.
The reg of charge is a good plAce to start. Or Daz’s words in the Ox Mail this am.
Don’t worry, though, I’m expecting to hear from Tiger’s lawyers by close of play
No it’s not. You claim to be a journalist and it irritates me when your “profession” makes claims of fact that they can’t justify. Trying to make a joke of it just makes it worse. Just learn this. If you make a statement of “fact” be prepared to back it up. First rule of journalism I would have thought.The reg of charge is a good plAce to start. Or Daz’s words in the Ox Mail this am.
Don’t worry, though, I’m expecting to hear from Tiger’s lawyers by close of play
But that is mainly linked to personalities rather than this charge...
But that is mainly linked to personalities rather than this charge...
I'm sure lots of passengers on the Titanic shouted at each other as the boat sank.
I'm sure lots of passengers on the Titanic shouted at each other as the boat sank.
Will someone please straighten that row of deckchairs!
Did OxVox meet the iceberg?OxVox are too cosy with the deck boys ?
invited it and brokered the meeting between the iceberg and the Titanic, I heardDid OxVox meet the iceberg?
invited it and brokered the meeting between the iceberg and the Titanic, I heardDid OxVox meet the iceberg?
To summarise this thread and what I can figure out.....we're probably 90% likely to have a miserable few years to come supporting OUFC.
No it’s not. You claim to be a journalist and it irritates me when your “profession” makes claims of fact that they can’t justify. Trying to make a joke of it just makes it worse. Just learn this. If you make a statement of “fact” be prepared to back it up. First rule of journalism I would have thought.
No it’s not. You claim to be a journalist and it irritates me when your “profession” makes claims of fact that they can’t justify. Trying to make a joke of it just makes it worse. Just learn this. If you make a statement of “fact” be prepared to back it up. First rule of journalism I would have thought.