If anyone thinks they are having a bad day... just watch the PM statement over Mandelson's vetting![]()
Are those the posters that told everyone to vote Labour because it couldnt get any worse but now all claim they didnt vote Labour?He "misled Parliament by mistake"..........................
What a complete crock of BS.
Amazing how the Labour supporters appear to have gone AWOL all of a sudden......
Are those the posters that told everyone to vote Labour because it couldnt get any worse but now all claim they didnt vote Labour?
There are no Labour voters left. They barely had any at the last GE, let alone now.Yes, those ones.
The last couple of years of the Conservatives was a spectacular effort at shooting themselves in both feet several times bit this lot are making them look like amateurs.
Roll on 7th May............. it`ll be a bloodbath.
I`ll be chuckling by a pool somewhere warm and sunny.
He does need to go but who the next choice will be is anyone’s guess. Wes Streeting won’t be their choice as he is clearly on the right wing of the Labour Party. Angela Rayner has unfinished business. Andy Burnham not even an MP.To paraphrase the prime minister
I wasn’t informed of the advice because I was walking around shouting” la la la I can’t hear you”very loudly.
I get that there is a need to plicate the orange twit but if you have a conversation along the lines of “mr trump he’ll bring Epstein with him and some of that s**t will rub off on you!” he’d have fallen straight in line.
Owning it when it first came out and at that point saying we’ve looked at the vetting and it seems he got through which isn’t good and we need to tighten up the process woukd have been a rideable storm
I was full of hope for a new dawn in British politics when he was elected but he’s shown no ownership or grace in this whole fiasco.
He needs to go.
To paraphrase the prime minister
I wasn’t informed of the advice because I was walking around shouting” la la la I can’t hear you”very loudly.
I get that there is a need to plicate the orange twit but if you have a conversation along the lines of “mr trump he’ll bring Epstein with him and some of that s**t will rub off on you!” he’d have fallen straight in line.
Owning it when it first came out and at that point saying we’ve looked at the vetting and it seems he got through which isn’t good and we need to tighten up the process woukd have been a rideable storm
I was full of hope for a new dawn in British politics when he was elected but he’s shown no ownership or grace in this whole fiasco.
He needs to go.
And Diane Abbott, most coherent thing I've heard her say in a long while.Its a bit odd when you find yourself agreeing with Zarah Sultana and Lee Anderson over the same thing!![]()
And the select committee made for interesting viewing............ has he gone yet or is he clinging on until May when the bloodbath occurs?
It has actually fallen slightly...Unemployment - UP
I reckon he'll cling on until after the locals and then take the fall for that too (as I said about 4 months ago, but there we are. . .) That leaves 60% of their time in this parliamentary term left. That's a whole Johnson (beset by Covid and multiple scandals), or a May (hamstrung by Brexit), nearly 2 Rishi's or 25 Liz Trusses
It's certainly likely to be an interesting multi-party government after the next GE as Tories are already toast, Labour going the same way, Reform going into meltdown as they are increasingly found out as a party of one policy and even less scruples (how is Tice doing with that troublesome tax bill btw?), Lib Dems continue to do Lib Dems stuff and not really trouble the scorers and Greens are just a bit too lefty and have too much of a social conscience for many to stomach. Yet again I suspect voting will be dominated by who people don't want as opposed to who they do.
Step forward Rupert Lowe and let the real clown show commence![]()
![]()
It has actually fallen slightly...
![]()
Unemployment rate unexpectedly falls as fewer students look for work
The drop has been largely driven by a rise in the number of people not actively seeking work.www.bbc.co.uk
It did require an incredibly weak Nick Clegg though, who essentially not only backed down on his manifesto promises, but in certain cases, actively did the opposite of what he promised to do (uni fees a perfect example).No doubt we'll hear increasingly just how bad, weak and ineffective coalition governments are in the lead up to the next GE . . .
I was interested to hear though (last week on Newscast, I think) that the general consensus was that the last Lib/Tory coalition was in fact pretty effective at pushing stuff through as it all came down to Cameron/Osbourne/Clegg/Alexander making all the decisions in a very top down system that managed to avoid much of the gumming up of process in various departments that has subsequently hindered getting stuff done since.
Not that I was a massive fan of pretty much anything they did, especially the absolutely disasterously short sighted and particularly pernicious austerity measures, but it did prove (to a point) that where there was a will . . .
I would take a different view. The coalition was dominated by the Tories,which would be inevitable whoever they were in coalition with; our staid political system, centralised government, the Establishment… Labour in Office pretty much focusses on making Toryism work; the growing gap between rich and poor, the great God of the ‘market’ and privatisation…l will continue to support the Labour Party, which is replete with talented and committed people despite the dross evidenced by the present Leadership.No doubt we'll hear increasingly just how bad, weak and ineffective coalition governments are in the lead up to the next GE . . .
I was interested to hear though (last week on Newscast, I think) that the general consensus was that the last Lib/Tory coalition was in fact pretty effective at pushing stuff through as it all came down to Cameron/Osbourne/Clegg/Alexander making all the decisions in a very top down system that managed to avoid much of the gumming up of process in various departments that has subsequently hindered getting stuff done since.
Not that I was a massive fan of pretty much anything they did, especially the absolutely disasterously short sighted and particularly pernicious austerity measures, but it did prove (to a point) that where there was a will . . .
While I agree to you to an extent, as the junior party in the coalition, there was no way that the Lib Dems could be expected to honour and implement all of their manifesto pledges (coalition politics simply doesn't work like that), and given the imbalance in MPs they had very little political leverage. Their only real weapon was the threat of collapsing the coalition, which - as a party advocating proportional representation which generally produces coalitions - would hardly be a smart tactic.It did require an incredibly weak Nick Clegg though, who essentially not only backed down on his manifesto promises, but in certain cases, actively did the opposite of what he promised to do (uni fees a perfect example).
It could work, but only with a particularly spineless "second in command" coalition partner.