Thomas/Brock/Jones
Well-known member
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2019
- Messages
- 4,565
reports that Reading are to be docked 9 points ! Love to be playing them next season
reports that Reading are to be docked 9 points ! Love to be playing them next season
With a possible 8 other clubs going to be looked at the relegation battle will be who gets deducted the most points. A good time to be shi* and have a poor season for some of the others
No idea why Reading are to be docked 9 points. But I fully support the decision to do so!!
From that article...Reading in line for points deduction over breach of EFL financial rules
Reading are set to be deducted between six and nine points by the English Football League for breaching financial ruleswww.theguardian.com
That is utter madness.Reading’s reported £41m wage bill in 2018-19 equated to 194% of turnover.
If the EFL failed to dock points for all the financial shenanigans at the skip, I think there is more chance of them docking points for ‘being irritating!’Quality. So if my thinking is correct they could still yet be docked additional points for being irritating.
From that article...
That is utter madness.
For breaching profit and sustainability regulations. They are allowed to lose a max of £39million over 3 seasons. They will likely be well over that given their wage bill in 18/19 was at 194% of turnover and they had a total loss of £40million that year alone. They've tried the old sell the ground trick (they got £26.5million for it and now pay £1.5million/year rent). They were put under a transfer embargo in the summer for it pending further investigation, and are now set for a points deduction of between 6 & 9 points.Is it just for being irritating or is there another reason too?
Is that right? presumably the monies to make up the 194% turnover spend is likely to have come from the owners and so if it’s written off, they lose out. If OUFC entered administration, it would be the current board who stood to lose whatever debt is in the club as I believe it is owed to them and not to other third parties (at least not any material amounts).In what other business can you spend 194% of turnover on wages and think "oh yeah, that's fine."
I don't agree with everything Gary Neville says, but he did make a point in relation to the mess at Derby that owners should be personally liable if they're spending this money. It seems like they have a low risk/high reward gamble where if they get into the Premier League they could look to personally cash in, where as if they lose, they can say "oh no, that's the club that lost all that money... not me"
The ownership is likely through a web of companies, one company lending to another, ending up overseas. Would go down as a business debt.Is that right? presumably the monies to make up the 194% turnover spend is likely to have come from the owners and so if it’s written off, they lose out. If OUFC entered administration, it would be the current board who stood to lose whatever debt is in the club as I believe it is owed to them and not to other third parties (at least not any material amounts).
Is that right? presumably the monies to make up the 194% turnover spend is likely to have come from the owners and so if it’s written off, they lose out. If OUFC entered administration, it would be the current board who stood to lose whatever debt is in the club as I believe it is owed to them and not to other third parties (at least not any material amounts).
I'd add - don't spend your own money even if you foot the bill and then walk away with a personal loss but leaving the club with ongoing outstanding player contracts and other debts it needs to try and service.To be honest I don't know. I'll freely admit I've made a bit of a generalisation and don't know what's gone on at Reading. Irresponsible owners are just a gripe of mine so I may have unfairly tarred them with the same brush, but if the owners are struggling to pay bills than inevitably the fans are having a hard time of it, which is really where my issue is. Some owners will absorb losses that come as a result of their overspending (like Abramovich at Chelsea or the UAE at Man City) but I'm also sure there are many instances in the past where owners have spanked the club's money i.e. spending next season's season ticket money or selling off club property and gambled that cash on getting up, before leaving the club in the lurch if it all goes wrong. By all means waste your own money if you foot the bill, just don't waste the club's in a bid to try and get a payday for yourself, and then wash your hands of it when it goes wrong.