I’m not sure that’s ever been true lol. I’m sure the current Conservative government would strongly disagree with you.There is no such thing as bad publicity they used to say.................
I love that we have this thread arguing that we should not adapt our behaviour to accommodate the wishes of a minority group not to be offended, at exactly the same time as another where posters are falling over themselves to decry those who have not changed their behaviour to accommodate the wishes of a minority group not to be offended....
What a contrary lot we are
Well in some cases the product name is offensive and needs changing:Therein is the difference you see.
Product name - not offensive.
Active discrimination - offensive.
It is all about context and usage.
Well in some cases the product name is offensive and needs changing:
Cheer cheese - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Let’s hope you never have to earn your crust in a Marketing Department.Had they left it alone as "Red Coon" though then it would be far less offensive.
And don`t get me started on Uncle Ben`s rice............................
Uncle Ben's rice changes name to more 'equitable' brand
Products will be labelled Ben's Original and will no longer show the bow-tied black man on packaging.www.bbc.co.uk
They were hoping for increased publicity. So well done.
In terms of a service, it's probably about as welcome as those train tannoy announcements somebody is getting in a froth about....[emoji6][emoji1787]Glad to provide a service to prove the world is going to
That's twice today........ barstards.
“more inclusive” means more customers. It’s just good business sense.
You and your capitalism[emoji849]
