National News Next Prime Minister

Oufcrealist

Level: Yemi Odubade
(158 Apps, 31 Gls)
Should the next Tory leader and consequently the next Prime Minister be chosen by just 124 thousand people?
We are in a bit of a mess to put it mildly and it doesn't sit at all well with me. Especially as the present incumbent was chose in the same way!!
 
Should the next Tory leader and consequently the next Prime Minister be chosen by just 124 thousand people?
We are in a bit of a mess to put it mildly and it doesn't sit at all well with me. Especially as the present incumbent was chose in the same way!!
IMO no .... there again Im not a member of any political party

... its fine for political parties to select their party leader by whatever means the said party decides upon.... however ( again IMO), I think if it isn't the deputy PM stepping up, ( thats why there is a Deputy PM isnt it?), following any PM stepping down, it should be the country who decide on the PM, via a GE

Tory party would commit the equivalent of political suicide, IF there was a GE called before the Brexit situation is resolved, and they know it too

a proper Catch 22 of their very own making , aww, bless those 'poor' tax dodging posho's :rolleyes: :sneaky:
 
Should the next Tory leader and consequently the next Prime Minister be chosen by just 124 thousand people?
We are in a bit of a mess to put it mildly and it doesn't sit at all well with me. Especially as the present incumbent was chose in the same way!!
Write to your MP and ask them to raise the issue in the house.
 
I'm not a Tory, but it's the PM not a President. You vote for a party and their policies (not for who you want to be PM), and then it's up to the parties to implement their manifesto pledges (ha ha) and choose a PM who can get them through. If the person they've chosen isn't up to it, then they have the right to try someone else.
 
Not just a tory thing, Labour did the same with Gordon Brown didn't they?

As pointed out, we don't vote in Prime Ministers, we vote in parties.
Don't go along with that. In more recent years lots of people vote for personalities rather than parties. Blair was a big personality and the Tories had nobody to match him. Brown was dull in comparison and Cameron just shaded him. Labour won't win a GE because of Corbyn. If they had a big likeable personality as leader they would be doing much better in the polls. I can tell you for sure a large portion of the electorate vote for the 'person' they would like as Prime Minister and not manifesto's.
 
Don't go along with that. In more recent years lots of people vote for personalities rather than parties. Blair was a big personality and the Tories had nobody to match him. Brown was dull in comparison and Cameron just shaded him. Labour won't win a GE because of Corbyn. If they had a big likeable personality as leader they would be doing much better in the polls. I can tell you for sure a large portion of the electorate vote for the 'person' they would like as Prime Minister and not manifesto's.
That perception is fair enough, but it's still the fact we don't vote for PMs. They have a bearing of course, but our system isn't built that way.
 
It looks like the fix is in with BoJo being the new PM. Seconded the most in MPs and clear leader with the members, so the rules are being reviewed to see if the Tories get him in sooner rather than later so he can get to the EU.

Quite interesting as he's not spoken publically and no one knows what his program would be as PM. I guess the spectre of Oh Jeremy and Brexit failings have focused minds.
 
It looks like the fix is in with BoJo being the new PM. Seconded the most in MPs and clear leader with the members, so the rules are being reviewed to see if the Tories get him in sooner rather than later so he can get to the EU.

Quite interesting as he's not spoken publically and no one knows what his program would be as PM. I guess the spectre of Oh Jeremy and Brexit failings have focused minds.

He hasn't spoken publically as he has been advised not to as it goes wrong when he does.
 
spoof/ fake news it may be .... on the back of potential tory leaders/ Pm candidates 'down wiv da kidz' revelations of controlled substance use/abuse being fashionionable, this did make me laugh :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

 
If they choose Johnson it will be because they think its best for the continued existence of the Conservative Party in it's current form rather than because they think it's good for the country. He is clearly NOT the most capable, trustworthy or truthful candidate.
 
Last edited:
If they choose Johnson it will be because they think its best for the continued existence of the Conservative Party in it's current form rather than because the think it's good for the country. He is clearly NOT the most capable, trustworthy or truthful candidate.

That has been the overriding Tory reasoning from the very start for the Referendum offer in the Manifesto and ever since. All about the internal Party politics.
 
That’s what Labour did with Wilson to Callaghan and Blair to Brown.
Not a big fan of that happening but if someone dies like Douglas Home then a natural successor was appointed.
I personally think it will be Johnson now who replaces May as he looks to have party support.
Heady days coming our way
 
That’s what Labour did with Wilson to Callaghan and Blair to Brown.
Not a big fan of that happening but if someone dies like Douglas Home then a natural successor was appointed.
I personally think it will be Johnson now who replaces May as he looks to have party support.
Heady days coming our way

Embarrassing days anyway.
 
So, this all explains how political reality is formed. I suspect that it wont be long before Theresa May's addiction to parma violets will hit the headlines.

Still, in the spirit of drug use disclosure, I had a headache once, and I took nothing!........because nothing acts faster than Anadin!!!
 
acid drops were my downfall I have to admit ..never the same afterwards.

 
the same Nick Cohen? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Cohen
Views[edit]
Although for many years a critic of Tony Blair's foreign policy, he began modifying his views after 2001, advocating the 2003 invasion of Iraq,[3][4] and becoming a critic of the Stop the War Coalition.[5] In 2006, he was a leading signatory to the Euston Manifesto,[6] which proposed what it termed "a new political alignment" in which the left would take a stronger stance in favour of military intervention and against what the signatories deemed to be anti-American attitudes. An opponent of what he has termed the "tyrannophile left",[7] Cohen has criticised individuals such as Andrew Murray[5] and George Galloway,[8] while expressing his admiration for the opposition movements in countries such as Belarus.[7] He is an atheist.[9] He called for Western military intervention in the Syrian Civil War.[10] He also supported the NATO-led intervention in Libya to oust former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.[11] In August 2014, Cohen was one of 200 public figures who were signatories to a letter to The Guardian opposing Scottish independence in the run-up to September's referendum on that issue.[12] Cohen criticised Ecuador for granting political asylum to Julian Assange and called Ecuador a "petro-socialist authoritarian state".[13]

Wonder what he makes of recent claims that Labour is inherently Anti-Semitic? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_UK_Labour_Party
and
https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-the-uk/jeremy-corbyns-anti-semitism-crisis
 
If you read with any depth you would know that Cohen has expressed contempt for Corbyn and the Left longtime and decried his anti-semitic (he says) activities.

I disagree with him mostly but he is even-handed, pro-democracy and intelligent. He enhances the political debate of this country. Long live sectarian jews.
 
"If you read with any depth you would know that Cohen has expressed contempt for Corbyn and the Left longtime and decried his anti-semitic (he says) activities. " - exactly Paul..contempt for Corbyn..like me and many millions of others.
 
the same Nick Cohen? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Cohen
Views[edit]
Although for many years a critic of Tony Blair's foreign policy, he began modifying his views after 2001, advocating the 2003 invasion of Iraq,[3][4] and becoming a critic of the Stop the War Coalition.[5] In 2006, he was a leading signatory to the Euston Manifesto,[6] which proposed what it termed "a new political alignment" in which the left would take a stronger stance in favour of military intervention and against what the signatories deemed to be anti-American attitudes. An opponent of what he has termed the "tyrannophile left",[7] Cohen has criticised individuals such as Andrew Murray[5] and George Galloway,[8] while expressing his admiration for the opposition movements in countries such as Belarus.[7] He is an atheist.[9] He called for Western military intervention in the Syrian Civil War.[10] He also supported the NATO-led intervention in Libya to oust former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.[11] In August 2014, Cohen was one of 200 public figures who were signatories to a letter to The Guardian opposing Scottish independence in the run-up to September's referendum on that issue.[12] Cohen criticised Ecuador for granting political asylum to Julian Assange and called Ecuador a "petro-socialist authoritarian state".[13]

Wonder what he makes of recent claims that Labour is inherently Anti-Semitic? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_UK_Labour_Party
and
https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-the-uk/jeremy-corbyns-anti-semitism-crisis

Doesn't change his point about the "fatberg of dishonesty".
 
Back
Top Bottom