You weren't slated for being negative, you were slated for being a dick and getting into a childish slagging match with everyone you could. Big difference.I remember getting slated, for being negative!!!
I wonder why??
You weren't slated for being negative, you were slated for being a dick and getting into a childish slagging match with everyone you could. Big difference.I remember getting slated, for being negative!!!
I wonder why??
Fixed it for youProbably because they’re not run by the Tory work event now there you may have got an answer today
Mate, just f**k off.I remember getting slated, for being negative!!!
I wonder why??
But in all fairness this is a new council which goes to show all councillors are ineptOxfordshire County Council incompetence strikes again.
Don't forget the microbreweryI think this will give everyone a bit of a reality check. We know what we are up against now, months/years away from anything significant. At least it will stop another hundred pages of everyone discussing the colour of the seats and the best places to have a pint. I just hope that the likes of Bakrie and Erik are patient men.
This is it for me. A clear lack of research and understanding from everyone there into what the proposal was entirely, and all they actually discussed was complete hypotheticals that goes way beyond what the meeting was actually for.The disappointment for me was the apparent lack of understanding on what they were looking at today. It was a start of conversation that was being voted on, not whether their voters want it.
There was also a feeling that they wouldn’t move at anyone else’s pace just because OuFC have a timescale. It almost seemed to miff them.
I didn’t watch it but wasn’t there a chairperson to ensure that the debate adhered to the actual agenda?! Reading the comments it seems it was allowed to get too emotional with personal agendas dictating.That whole vote was supposed (as per the agenda) to be to agree a proposal to enter into discussions with OUFC about the lease on the land. Instead, we got something completely different.
The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to enter into negotiations as requested by Oxford United Football Club (OUFC) and with Oxfordshire County Council’s current tenants to enable the use of Oxfordshire County Council (OCC) owned land for the development of a new football stadium, subject to planning permission.
@OUSP Secretary can you confirm, that the club will have staff members/volunteers with ipad's at Saturday's 10,000 plus crowd, canvassing for signatures on the petition?
It would be absolute folly behavior to overlook Saturday's potential to get support for the new complex.
I used to like you BazzerProbably because they’re not run by the Tory party now there you may have got an answer today
I hope not but maybe the club has been a tad guilty of complacency over today’s meeting?This is it for me. A clear lack of research and understanding from everyone there into what the proposal was entirely, and all they actually discussed was complete hypotheticals that goes way beyond what the meeting was actually for.
Why some random person, John Hill, who still nobody seems to know who he is, was allowed to spout untruths and negativity when no representative from OUFC was involved in the discussion is beyond me. If McWilliams was there he'd have shot down half that guys statement with three words. Erick f*****g Thohir.
That whole vote was supposed (as per the agenda) to be to agree a proposal to enter into discussions with OUFC about the lease on the land. Instead, we got something completely different.
The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to enter into negotiations as requested by Oxford United Football Club (OUFC) and with Oxfordshire County Council’s current tenants to enable the use of Oxfordshire County Council (OCC) owned land for the development of a new football stadium, subject to planning permission.