- Season Ticket
- Yes
- Stand
- North (Family)
Last edited by a moderator:
The forum would encourage all members to consider joining OxVox during this important moment in our history. See here for more information.
Not wholly surprising when it sounds like there was a possibility Mills would leave on loan under Rowett before Bloomfield had him looking like a Championship winger for the run in.Sounds like Danny Mills is a fan of Bloomers:View attachment 35711
Someone should start a thread where we just rehash the same old arguments again and again until we all lose the will to live.
A reasonsble amount to read between the lines there but pretty good take I'd say.Sounds like Danny Mills is a fan of Bloomers:View attachment 35711
Not wholly surprising when it sounds like there was a possibility Mills would leave on loan under Rowett before Bloomfield had him looking like a Championship winger for the run in.
Hopefully he hangs around for us a bit in League One. Smart clubs will most likely be taking a look at him, especially as a possible wing back option
Are you still banging on about Bloomfield not being good enough& that you don’t want him as manager.
Making a point that there’s a shed lot of hypocrisy on this thread, from you included.
You can’t wait for him to fail.Hahaha i suggest that you read my last comments on Bloomfield again....here they are for you to enjoy over your lunch:
FWIW, i too would have releived Bloomfield immediately after the final game of the season. Now that he is here, i expect him to get until the October international break, at least. It would be bizarre to give him the summer window, to then sack him after 5 or 6 games.
I sincerley hope that he is successful; i have my doubts, which i think are legitimate considering his failure to keep us up and his performance at Luton.
Can you see the difference? One of us is talking about a bloke, that wasn't backed last summer in the same way that Bloomfield was in January, and who left 6 months ago. The other one of us is providing context to support our opinions and still providing Bloomfield with the opportunity to put things right in the upcomimg season.
Point me in the direction of the hypocrisy...
Hahaha i suggest that you read my last comments on Bloomfield again....here they are for you to enjoy over your lunch:
FWIW, i too would have releived Bloomfield immediately after the final game of the season. Now that he is here, i expect him to get until the October international break, at least. It would be bizarre to give him the summer window, to then sack him after 5 or 6 games.
I sincerley hope that he is successful; i have my doubts, which i think are legitimate considering his failure to keep us up and his performance at Luton.
Can you see the difference? One of us is talking about a bloke, that wasn't backed last summer in the same way that Bloomfield was in January, and who left 6 months ago. The other one of us is providing context to support our opinions and still providing Bloomfield with the opportunity to put things right in the upcomimg season.
Point me in the direction of the hypocrisy...
You can’t wait for him to fail.
That’s where the hypocrisy comes in, along with a fair few others on this forum.
Have that opinion, I don’t lose sleep over it but it’s hypocritical to say you want him to be successful but you’d of relieved him of his role straight after Milwall.
As I said, people can’t wait for him to fail, even though he’s bought into what this club means, especially when others never did.
As I said, people can’t wait for him to fail, even though he’s bought into what this club means, especially when others never did.
But it's not every day you get a manager sprint over to the fans and fist pump after a win then not pick up a win in the seven games after that. He just gets itAgain, this is just emotive nonsense.
What is the 'buy in' and how has Bloomfield somehow demonstrated it?
I think what you mean is that you warm to him as an individual (which is fine, of course) - but unfortunately it's not in any way relevant to his competency as manager.
You can’t wait for him to fail.
That’s where the hypocrisy comes in, along with a fair few others on this forum.
Have that opinion, I don’t lose sleep over it but it’s hypocritical to say you want him to be successful but you’d of relieved him of his role straight after Milwall.
As I said, people can’t wait for him to fail, even though he’s bought into what this club means, especially when others never did.
Also very likely. Mixed bag, but personality definitely sways people that extra bit, even subconsciously.I actually think it’s the opposite, it’s his pashunate personality that means people give him a chance.
If it was someone with the “personality” of David Kemp and a two consecutive relegations in two seasons, plus some of the tactics, I’d suggest people might not be as patient.
Wow, we’re becoming one of those clubs.