hear you my friend - it's an existential thrill of a rollercoaster ride at the moment.
While my mood may fluctuate to some degree, there is something consistent in all of this for me.
I simply see it as choosing to believe between:
- Our Chairman, a man of incredible integrity if we are to believe everything we have ever seen of him to date, who comes from a culture where this/public shame is a critical personal value and who has now so muc himself riding on the positioin he has long taken on this.
- Who also recognises that due process is not always an immediate or straightforward matter.
- Who has come out and categorically denied any wrongdoing by City on these FFP charges
- Who assures us that his/our approach is completely clean and above board and our evidence irrefutable, and that all will eventually be resolved to our satisfaction.
- Who employed a man (Pep Guardiola) who it is clear, himself places massive value on integrity which you can see be the way he handles himself in public and with our players.
- Whom Pep - no mug in terms of character judge - chose to trust implicitly and dedicate a decade of his career and indeed life towards supporting.
- Who has built a football club that outperforms every other on virtually every count both on the pitch and off it.
- Who led us through a similarly testing time and to ultimate victory vs UEFA by playing the long game in the correct way.
versus
- A wildly out of control pitchfork brigade (and that's just the media) who all have vested interest in whipping up as much anti-City feeling on this matter as they can - partly due to the fact that they hitched their colours to that particular mast a long time ago.
- A league institution who have been consistently inconsistent in the way different teams are treated. From us, to Everton, to Chelsea, to the red shirts.
- Which has been shown to have shoddy process that resulted in the APT farce, rules which themselves were highlighted as being unlawful.
- Which has been shown to be disingenuous in trying to direct narrative in their favour on the APT ruling, claiming victory when it was nothing of the sort.
- Led by a man who was interviewed by two of the red cartel before being chosen (as were his predecessirs who insterestingly refused the job for unknown reasons).
- Previously led by a man who stated that the Premier League have a plan to ensure different names appear on the PL trophy over a given period. who also stated that a poor united team is not good for the PL (or strong one is good for it).
- A mysterious panel who have drawn conclusions that are both brutally bold on their condemnation, as well as seemingly not having reviewed critical evidence that may be highly material to the case.
In the absence of any solid evidence contrary to the above, as good or a badly as I feel about our chances at any given point, it is an easy choice for me on who to believe every single morning, and that's reassuring.