That’s exactly on the button. When a club our size is losing £2million a year it makes sense to cash in on two players without too many appearance.A club with true ambition what does that mean? In some ways running a football year on year losing nearly 2m is pretty ambitious? Or fool hardy? Were Sunderland ambitious bringing in grigg?
The budget is a lot less than people think.In fairness though he can’t complain to much can he. I think they’ve backed him for the most part. I don’t know what our wage budget is but it must be one of the highest in league 1. Some of our players are not exactly cheap are they.
I think he was well aware that if a big money bid came in then we would have to sell because that’s the business model. I think he enjoys developing players.
He left Charlton when they were ninth in the league and their fans were largely glad to see the back of him - my mate’s wife is both a Charlton fan and works in their community department, and every time I see her she makes a point of thanking me as though I personally handed over the cash. Then Lee Bowyer took over the same team with ten games or so left, got them into the playoffs with games to spare, and then won promotion the following season.After all, he walked out of Charlton when they were set fair for promotion.
Said this the other day. Something has definitely changed over the last few weeks, the whole mood has changed..Interesting words from Robinson after today’s game “We’re a selling club, we’ve cut everything back, but we’re still competing on all fronts” When he says we’ve cut everything back it sounds like something thats happened recently?
He knows the situation at Oxford better than anybody. We are selling club for the time being which won’t change anytime soon.
Interesting words from Robinson after today’s game “We’re a selling club, we’ve cut everything back, but we’re still competing on all fronts” When he says we’ve cut everything back it sounds like something thats happened recently?
Or perhaps there are other factors for spending too. And as such it meant a compromise.Maybe too much has been spent on buying the long lease for the training ground and on the facilities there?
We are not paying rent on the training ground ( although the upkeep.of the pitches and continued development is presumably costing fair amount)Maybe too much has been spent on buying the long lease for the training ground and on the facilities there?
That was my understanding but in his interview yesterday, Zaki definitely said one of the added expenses this year was buying the 25 year lease on the training ground (buying the lease - not rent).We are not paying rent on the training ground ( although the upkeep.of the pitches and continued development is presumably costing fair amount)
An associate director I believe.He seemed to be very unhappy with someone in the SSU after Ruffs mistake 2nd half Saturday. Anyone closer to it who knows what that was about?
An associate director I believe.
I wonder if KR will let it go, whoever it is.Certainly not me LR....I heard nothing and can't imagine any of us would act in such a way.
I wonder if this board will ever let it go??!!!I wonder if KR will let it go, whoever it is.
Mackie's back pass