chuckbert
Well-known member
- Joined
- 8 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 6,757
Well - Sykes choosing RoI could be like a cascarino who chose England and never got a game. Alternatively, Sykes choosing NI could (in a universe where he started setting world alight a year or so ago) could end up like Giggs choosing Wales and being a star in a team going nowhere.Eh? Not sure I follow you. Giggs was born in Wales and only ever wanted to play for Wales (he played for England Schoolboys because he went to school in England). Cascarino was born and brought up in Kent, and played for ROI because he believed he had an Irish Granny (he didn't, as it turned out!). Giggs would have played 100+ times for England, Cascarino probably never. My point is that Sykes can absolutely choose to play for who he likes, but whereas he would have got 30-40 caps for NI, he's pretty unlikely to even get in an ROI squad. He declared for ROI after (apparently) he was sounded out by them. But the word on the street in Belfast is that his agent was stirring, as ROI never picked him, despiet the alleged 'interest'. He played all the NI age groups, and they were furious at losing him. No indication at all he was planning to switch.
International teams are full of players who had a choice, and picking the ambitious choice even if it doesn’t work out isn’t necessarily wrong, and picking the conservative choice and then never having the chance to play in the big comps isn’t necessarily right.