Dubai Yellow
Active member
- Joined
- 9 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 797
We need defenders as badly as strikers. Two awful goals. Second one 3 or 4 of our players caught ball watching. Sunday league.
Media days take place on ThursdayJust watched the ‘pre Fleetwood’ interview with Robinson on Ifollow. He said he was still hoping to get a midfielder in in time for today’s game - I assume the interview took place yesterday morning, so presumably they ran out of time and the deal will now be completed on Monday. On the striker front he said he’s no further forward so hopefully that indicates the quality of striker we’re after and they’re taking time to weigh up their options. If that’s the case, we’ll just have to be patient unfortunately
People can rant all they want. Robinson isn’t going anywhere. I want him to jog on as much as anyone but Tiger isn’t going to get rid of him. We have to support them, it’s the only chance we’ve got.
Can’t delete those that have quoted me but I’ve deleted mine ?
And that's the problem with social media, once it's out there you can't control it. You've deleted your post but that's irrelevant because others have quoted you and you've now admitted to posting it in the above quote - hmmm.
Mr Evans is I suspect quite well off and could afford a quick writ especially as he'd be likely to win damages.
And that's the problem with social media, once it's out there you can't control it. You've deleted your post but that's irrelevant because others have quoted you and you've now admitted to posting it in the above quote - hmmm.
Mr Evans is I suspect quite well off and could afford a quick writ especially as he'd be likely to win damages.
Well if no more is said even if it was my opinion then that should be the end of it but with a few thousand singing abuse at him when he played for Chesterfield I don’t think he’s bothered.....any way I ain’t got nothingMods should muzzle Bazza for his own sake
Well if no more is said even if it was my opinion then that should be the end of it but with a few thousand singing abuse at him when he played for Chesterfield I don’t think he’s bothered.....any way I ain’t got nothing
Reading absolute horseshit.Reading that he ain’t got a clue
That’s what i said on Radox voting the Clyne situation, if the striker he’s after in a couple of weeks, why not now simple.Bazzer’s stream of consciousness ramblings aside, there was an odd text on RadOx where a texter has said that KR had only signed a couple of his own choices of players.
Whilst this may seem far fetched, it begs the question a lot of us were saying in the week - just who is signing players for us? KR goes off looking at players and then moans (often in anger) that the likes of Hanson isn’t his signing. Just what is our set up?
I’m cool on his approach in waiting on his number one target to become available. What the protocol if it falls through? Shotton said it sounded risky citing the recent Liverpool-Bournemouth-Cardiff confusion over Nathanial Clyne as an example.
It all sounds risky too me.
Bazzer’s stream of consciousness ramblings aside, there was an odd text on RadOx where a texter has said that KR had only signed a couple of his own choices of players.
Whilst this may seem far fetched, it begs the question a lot of us were saying in the week - just who is signing players for us? KR goes off looking at players and then moans (often in anger) that the likes of Hanson isn’t his signing. Just what is our set up?
I’m cool on his approach in waiting on his number one target to become available. What the protocol if it falls through? Shotton said it sounded risky citing the recent Liverpool-Bournemouth-Cardiff confusion over Nathanial Clyne as an example.
It all sounds risky too me.
Smith was blatantly a Tiger signing.We’re you cool waiting on his last no1 target? Sam Smith although someone said on Radox last week Robinson said to him that Smith wasn’t one of his players, rambling?
Played lots of games for us so will make a big difference. ?
To be fair aren’t damages in a slander or libel case awarded in relation to how damaging the statement is likely to be, taking into account the speaker’s platform and how many people are likely to be exposed to and influenced by the statement? Much as we all love bazzer’s posts I’m not sure a judge would find the statement to be particularly damaging to evans’ reputation more generally, given his audience is other fans of a rather obscure L1 football club on a rather obscure internet forum - so damages would be meagre at bestWhat he thinks of others actions towards him is totally irrelevant. He only has to take offence at your written assertion. It's also difficult to prove that a voice in the crowd was saying something abusive that is defamatory, when it's in black and white it can be displayed for all to see.
Even if you don't have material assets, you do have something - future earnings. These can be awarded as damages to a successful claimant. Wouldn't be great to work all week and then have some of your hard earned going directly to Mr Evans.
Either not fit or not wanting to be in the country eg. at Christmas as didn’t want to be here so clearly not interested. Next!Was he actually given a chance to show what he can do?