January 2019 Transfer Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted member 462

Guest
And raglan and possibly Holmes as well we would be five players down and two up on an already thin squad.
But from another angle, we had 4 gk and 4 rb. And Holmes, Smith and raglan never played. So it’s not really reducing the squad. But already the two that have come in will make more appearance between now and the end of the season than the 5 who have left.
 

RCYellowRC

Active member
Joined
13 Dec 2017
Messages
983
And the bloke who has never played for us who’s looking for a new club
None of them played FFS so it's not like we've lost anything. Mitchell hadn't played a league game since October, Holmes hasn't been fit since October,Mcmahon had a spell of about 10 games and was then injured for the other games or could only make the bench. Smith was atrocious, Raglan has played 12 minutes of league this season.

So really we've lost nothing, your just being a miserable knobhead.
 

Cass63

Active member
Joined
21 Dec 2017
Messages
368
None of them played FFS so it's not like we've lost anything. Mitchell hadn't played a league game since October, Holmes hasn't been fit since October,Mcmahon had a spell of about 10 games and was then injured for the other games or could only make the bench. Smith was atrocious, Raglan has played 12 minutes of league this season.

So really we've lost nothing, your just being a miserable knobhead.
Thank god you know Sykes and graham are going to be world beaters you knobhead.
 

Archieyellow

Active member
Joined
31 Dec 2017
Messages
279
None of them played FFS so it's not like we've lost anything. Mitchell hadn't played a league game since October, Holmes hasn't been fit since October,Mcmahon had a spell of about 10 games and was then injured for the other games or could only make the bench. Smith was atrocious, Raglan has played 12 minutes of league this season.

So really we've lost nothing, your just being a miserable knobhead.
That’s very brave calling people knobheads, why do you think you should use the word knobhead when someone has a different thought to you ?
 

Banbury2018

Active member
Joined
1 Jan 2018
Messages
538
The Goalkeeper, smith and the RB who went to Scunthorpe and we do not have money yet, look at the tax and lack of recruitment team in place
The keeper was surplus to requirements, McMahon wasn’t happy andSmith wasn’t doing good enough. We have a recruitment team in place. Do you not accept the Oxvox statements regarding tax. Did we pay a fee for Sykes? Striker issues need addressing but if we sign any players that strengthens our team surely that is good.
 
D

Deleted member 462

Guest
Thank god you know Sykes and graham are going to be world beaters you knobhead.
They don’t have to be world beaters. They have to be better than/ play more than what we have got rid of, to class as improvements . Same in the striker department. If we bring in someone who’s fitter than Mackie and obika, and scores more goals than Mackie, obika or Smith then it’s an improvement. Shouldn’t be hard with 3 goals between them.
 

bazzer9461

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
5,862
The keeper was surplus to requirements, McMahon wasn’t happy andSmith wasn’t doing good enough. We have a recruitment team in place. Do you not accept the Oxvox statements regarding tax. Did we pay a fee for Sykes? Striker issues need addressing but if we sign any players that strengthens our team surely that is good.
Still 3 out though. The keeper may have been surplus to requirements but apparently our Jack Stevens isn’t capable yet so we had to have an inexperienced keeper in to cover Easty, shame about McMahon and Smith was here 6 months to long. Yes we have Sykes and thatnlooks a good acquisition and most of us know about Graham butas you say strikers are the issue at this club but some seem to think my own moaning about to the lack of strikers seems to boat people but can’t they see that’s an issue. Look at Fleetwood 3 strikers in Evans, Madden and McAleny and have now recruited Chris Long where we haven’t apart from the mysterious invisible in 48 hrs signing.
 

bazzer9461

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
5,862
And McAleny still can’t get a start, I still can’t see why Robinson can’t make a tentative enquiry
 

Gary Baldi

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
3,782
What's worse? Signing Sam Smith 2.0 or waiting for someone who maybe better?
 

ZeroTheHero

Well-known member
Joined
7 Dec 2017
Messages
2,171
Bit odd though - why would you be considering getting a striker in if it wasn't one you really wanted? Also I would hope that we will be signing two strikers, even if one is a loanee youngster.
 

Gary Baldi

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
3,782
Bit odd though - why would you be considering getting a striker in if it wasn't one you really wanted? Also I would hope that we will be signing two strikers, even if one is a loanee youngster.
I guess its to get through the game today, vs what is better for the rest of the season. Damned if you do and damned if you don't
 

yellowbow

Well-known member
Joined
7 Dec 2017
Messages
2,853
Bit odd though - why would you be considering getting a striker in if it wasn't one you really wanted? Also I would hope that we will be signing two strikers, even if one is a loanee youngster.
I know I’ve made it clear in recent days that I’m not one of Robinson’s biggest supporters but I’ll back him on this occasion. All sorts of things go on in transfer windows. Agents push players on clubs. Maybe that’s what’s happened here and Robinson would rather hang fire and go for his preferred choice.

I agree though, I was hoping for more than one striker coming through the door. I hope this isn’t an indication that we’re only going to bring one in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads


Top Bottom