Current Player Thread Jack Currie

I would take the risk on Jack and start him Tuesday. I know he's 50/50, and tbf Brodie has done a decent job, but not having a natural left footer there seriously hinders us.
 
I would take the risk on Jack and start him Tuesday. I know he's 50/50, and tbf Brodie has done a decent job, but not having a natural left footer there seriously hinders us.

Makes you wonder if there is decent money on the table for him, he seems able to sprint and turn during warm ups but can’t get a look in when we are playing massive games for us. Agree about having Spencer on the left, it doesn’t work with him and MPH, no width down the left.
 
I would take the risk on Jack and start him Tuesday. I know he's 50/50, and tbf Brodie has done a decent job, but not having a natural left footer there seriously hinders us.
Nice of you to take the risk on a player's fitness and running the risk of potentially extending his recovery...
 
Let's think about the longer term view.

Currently, we're in a relegation fight with 3 games to go. 2 of which are at home. We have a key player who improves the balance of the team massively. The player is carrying an injury but says he can play. Management say he can play, but aren't choosing him incase he has to come off injured. Their rationale is that we then have to waste a sub.

The player plays and makes a positive impact. The player plays and comes off injured and he's out for the season. If he makes a positive impact he still has his scheduled operation in the Summer.

If he comes off injured he still has the scheduled operation and takes long off during the Summer to rehabilitate.

There's also the scenario where he doesn't play, gets the operation and leaves. Or he gets the operation and stays. Or we play him and his injury gets worse and we ruin an asset.

There's lots of scenarios. Lots of what ifs. Lots of potential outcomes. If Jack is putting himself forward I would start him on Tuesday. If we're all but mathematically down by Saturday then I'd give Jack the remaining 2 games off and start Brodie.
 
Bodie played well to be fair ,one or both will probably be sold if we go down for good money .Let's hope for a miracle
 
Nice of you to take the risk on a player's fitness and running the risk of potentially extending his recovery...
You have to assume that when people say they would take a risk on an injured player, that they have never taken a day off work due to sickness before as they would just work through what ever they had.
 
I actually think Brodie Spencer was one of our best players yesterday, and has done well at left back. No need to risk Currie unless Spencer gets injured, I think.

The problem is that he is very right footed, as is MPH, we have no natural width down that side with both of them there.
 
I actually think Brodie Spencer was one of our best players yesterday, and has done well at left back. No need to risk Currie unless Spencer gets injured, I think.

Brodie Spencer is a class act, fast becoming one of my favourites. Absolute athlete.

But we really should have Currie or Roosken on what is now a massively swollen bench (that regularly allows for multiple 'meh' attacking options) for the above eventuality - preferably the former if he is as close to a return as we're led to believe.

It's indefensible to have to resort to Shemmy at LB as we did when sh*tting the bed at Portsmouth.
 
Let's face it -players aren't always the best judges of their fitness - they would all play on one leg if that were possible!
 
Let's think about the longer term view.

Currently, we're in a relegation fight with 3 games to go. 2 of which are at home. We have a key player who improves the balance of the team massively. The player is carrying an injury but says he can play. Management say he can play, but aren't choosing him incase he has to come off injured. Their rationale is that we then have to waste a sub.

The player plays and makes a positive impact. The player plays and comes off injured and he's out for the season. If he makes a positive impact he still has his scheduled operation in the Summer.

If he comes off injured he still has the scheduled operation and takes long off during the Summer to rehabilitate.

There's also the scenario where he doesn't play, gets the operation and leaves. Or he gets the operation and stays. Or we play him and his injury gets worse and we ruin an asset.

There's lots of scenarios. Lots of what ifs. Lots of potential outcomes. If Jack is putting himself forward I would start him on Tuesday. If we're all but mathematically down by Saturday then I'd give Jack the remaining 2 games off and start Brodie.
The worst case scenario is clearly worse than you think, otherwise he'd be involved
 
Nice of you to take the risk on a player's fitness and running the risk of potentially extending his recovery...

Joe Skarz played through a ruptured groin to win us promotion. There's a long list of players within our club and elsewhere who have played through injury to fight to the end. Sometimes it pays off, sometimes it doesn't. If the player is willing, and a player as big as Currie, play him.
 
Joe Skarz played through a ruptured groin to win us promotion. There's a long list of players within our club and elsewhere who have played through injury to fight to the end. Sometimes it pays off, sometimes it doesn't. If the player is willing, and a player as big as Currie, play him.
There are also some, such as David Langan, who are now paying for doing that later in life. If Currie is cleared by the medical team then great, but I'd be very reluctant to take a chance on any player's fitness and wellbeing otherwise.
 
Didn't Skarz also say that he never recovered from playing with the injury and it affected the rest of his career as well ?
He did indeed. Important to remember that this affects not only their career in future but also their lives post-game too.
 
Back
Top Bottom