MJB
Well-known member
- Joined
- 6 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 7,876
Can really see a Swedish 3rd División side paying a big contribution towards his wages, £50 a week and some of those nice meatballs?
Steady on mate, there’s kids reading these forums.
Can really see a Swedish 3rd División side paying a big contribution towards his wages, £50 a week and some of those nice meatballs?
Steady on mate, there’s kids reading these forums.
He’s taking what’s owed to him. It’s up to us to find a compromise to get rid of him no matter how much KR chunters about him. Unless Ivo actually does something to encourage us to sack him, he’s here picking up a wage.
He’s our Winston Bogarde.
Thanks a bunch, Pep.
might play him in this seasons ox senior cup v ox city if hes still with oufc in feb? ....he did play just over half last seasons ox senior cup v 'City after allKR can get him back and doing some running at least.
might play him in this seasons ox senior cup v ox city if hes still with oufc in feb? ....he did play just over half last seasons ox senior cup v 'City after all
He’s taking what’s owed to him. It’s up to us to find a compromise to get rid of him no matter how much KR chunters about him. Unless Ivo actually does something to encourage us to sack him, he’s here picking up a wage.
He’s our Winston Bogarde.
Thanks a bunch, Pep.
4g artificial playing surface isnt all that for anyones knees!That won't be good for his knees.
I have been more patient than most, I suspect, with Robinson, but this really gets me annoyed. Strikes me as very bad commercial management and man management.
Pekalski is signed by the club, has an unfortunate injury and then (presumably) does his best to get fit so he can contribute. Robinson then tells him he's not going to use him and so Pekalski says, ok in that case can I go back home for Christmas. And remember how KR has banged on about how important families are and having time with them.) KR let's him go back and then criticizes him for doing so! If he had stormed off without permission he would presumably have sacked
Pekalski now says, after trying to find a club, well if you're that keen to get rid of me, then pay up (more of) my contract.
I know there are a few "presumablys" in there and maybe I am giving the benefit of the doubt to Ivo. But he does seem to getting very different treatment than say Carruthers, who in terms of bad, unfortunate injury has been in a similar situation.
He’s taking what’s owed to him. It’s up to us to find a compromise to get rid of him no matter how much KR chunters about him. Unless Ivo actually does something to encourage us to sack him, he’s here picking up a wage.
He’s our Winston Bogarde.
Thanks a bunch, Pep.
He sit on his OUFC contract till Swedish deadline day I reckonif he can still sign for someone until april surely he’ll be off
The situation is not quite as you state. Robinson gave Ivo his blessing to return home for Christmas and to find himself another club. After a few weeks in Sweden, Ivo announces that he has no deals in place but wants to stay in Sweden. Robinson tells him to get his s**t together or get back to Oxford and train. Not sure what else he would be expected to do? He even gave the option of ending his contract, but Ivo wants a pay out first. Ivo may well be within his rights to get every penny contracted to him, but he's still shifting our club who have already paid him a small fortune for a few minutes of football.I have been more patient than most, I suspect, with Robinson, but this really gets me annoyed. Strikes me as very bad commercial management and man management.
Pekalski is signed by the club, has an unfortunate injury and then (presumably) does his best to get fit so he can contribute. Robinson then tells him he's not going to use him and so Pekalski says, ok in that case can I go back home for Christmas. And remember how KR has banged on about how important families are and having time with them.) KR let's him go back and then criticizes him for doing so! If he had stormed off without permission he would presumably have sacked
Pekalski now says, after trying to find a club, well if you're that keen to get rid of me, then pay up (more of) my contract.
I know there are a few "presumablys" in there and maybe I am giving the benefit of the doubt to Ivo. But he does seem to getting very different treatment than say Carruthers, who in terms of bad, unfortunate injury has been in a similar situation.
I find people who side with Pekalski over this strange...
So back to yesterday's question, where is he exactly now.Where is he?? Still sitting around being paid? Why did we sign Kashi rather than use him as a reserve midfielder?