I think it is a badly written article and isn't very clear. But as he was on loan from Celtic to Peterhead then I assume they will have to pay the money (assuming as a share of what we paid Celtic for him). The other example was for a share of a transfer fee which suggests this so we wouldn't contest it as we had an agreement to pay Celtic anyway. Celtic may have challenged it but I don't know.Where does it say we spent it ?
Can we claim a share of the development of those 2 Man City players from last season and get a chunk of their transfer fees?