theres been 6 of our youngsters 'let go' in under 7 days .... hmmmmHave to say, possibly the only thing I do trust at the minute is Dan Harris and all he is doing with the academy.
I wonder if we see further U23 additions this summer plus U18s stepping up.
you n me both .... especially as he seemed to be a natural for the lone striker/ one up top role that KR, n his advisors/ coaching team, prefer.Wow!
Though HB was one for the future!
Or maybe that he wasn't deemed good enough - not everything has to fit the agendayou n me both .... especially as he seemed to be a natural for the lone striker/ one up top role that KR, n his advisors/ coaching team, prefer.
maybe a(nother) behind the scenes personality clash between a coach and a younger player????
fair viewpoint @Finlandia .... though having seen him play for the U23s more than a few times, albeit young and raw, he looked to me likley to become the kind of lone striker that would be ideal for the current OUFC set up, and I for one did like his fearless, take no-prisoners style of playingOr maybe that he wasn't deemed good enough - not everything has to fit the agenda
in Dan Harris we (should) trust ... I agree @OxfordYankeeWe saw him once at L1 level. He ran around lots, was aggressive but hardly touched the ball and when he did his touch was poor vs Dan Harris, oft lauded as one of the best things about the current setup at OUFC, who saw him many times, at a much lower level.
I know it's madness to think this, but perhaps Dan has more available data with which to make the decision than Bradbury's Adoring Hoards?
square pegs in round holes sometimes applies , with players told to play in a system that doesnt suit their natural way of playing, depending on the first team coaches and style of play that they prefer and impose? .... alternatively perhaps OUFC should scrap the U23s as a way to develop potential talent and rely on journeymen loanees no-one else wants?But as many have our fans have already said this season about the Sam Smiths (Under 23) not being good enough at a higher level, we can't be using our U23's as benchmark to progress to our first team
square pegs in round holes sometimes applies , with players told to play in a system that doesnt suit their natural way of playing, depending on the first team coaches and style of play that they prefer and impose? .... alternatively perhaps OUFC should scrap the U23s as a way to develop potential talent and rely on journeymen loanees no-one else wants?
This will happen every year Sarge.theres been 6 of our youngsters 'let go' in under 7 days .... hmmmm
.....And???theres been 6 of our youngsters 'let go' in under 7 days .... hmmmm
Totally agree Mooro......And???
Happens every season at this stage - with or without the Devs. If anything I'd say we've signed more 1st year pros this year than for a long time, and even accounting for some perhaps just blooding out the U23s, I'd still say the number set to grow into the senior squad (in time) is as high as ever.
how does having a personal opinion on a youngster being let go become a stick to beat the club with?No that's not what I said - the U23's are a great place for our juniors to develop. However, the gulf is huge t the first team, and a few promising performances do not warrant the overpraising some of the players have had. Only a tiny percentage ever make it - if you are good enough you will make it.
This is normal at every club - its a shame that it's being used as a stick to beat the club with.
Lofthouse is another-amongst others too, -in the last 2 U18s games I've seen he's scored a brace in each....he seems to have a bit of a natural goal scoring abilityTotally agree Mooro.
Lopez, Spasov, James, Jones, Elechi, Heap, Little.
Lots of very promising youngsters