Just hope their foreign office agree to the extradition or will trump try and gazing it.Harry Dunn crash death: US woman to be charged
Prosecutors said they had started extradition proceedings via the Home Office against Anne Sacoolas.www.bbc.co.uk
And rightly so...... justice takes time.
Its taken its time but it looks like some kind of justice will take place.
Harry Dunn death: Path clear for virtual trial, says foreign secretary
Dominic Raab says the UK can approach Anne Sacoolas's lawyers about holding some form of virtual trial.www.bbc.co.uk
Why?Because of the 'offence' or the fact that she went back to the US rather than stay.That seems the worse of both worlds. It is nice she is willing to serve a community service, how big of her. It should be 15000+ hours community service which involves her cleaning the streets and pavements in her state with a toothbrush.
The offence itself (particularly leaving thec scene) would usually result in an immediate custodial sentenceWhy?Because of the 'offence' or the fact that she went back to the US rather than stay.
The offence itself (particularly leaving thec scene) would usually result in an immediate custodial sentence
how is my comment incorrectIncorrect.
Triable on indictmentCausing death by dangerous driving – Sentencing
www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk
Maximum: 14 years’ custody.
Minimum disqualification of 2 years with compulsory extended re-test.
how is my comment incorrect
She didn't leave the scene, one of the falsehoods which have been reported.The offence itself (particularly leaving thec scene) would usually result in an immediate custodial sentence
Why?Because of the 'offence' or the fact that she went back to the US rather than stay.
For the offence or going back to the USA?That seems the worse of both worlds. It is nice she is willing to serve a community service, how big of her. It should be 15000+ hours community service which involves her cleaning the streets and pavements in her state with a toothbrush.
She has admitted to the offence so we know she caused the death by accidentally driving on the wrong side of the road, what sentence do you think is justified?It is the presumption that as she has gone back to the US she/her lawyers can dictate the type of sentence she gets if found guilty. That to me isn't justice.
Death by careless or dangerous driving. 2 years custodial would be the minimum I would expect.She has admitted to the offence so we know she caused the death by accidentally driving on the wrong side of the road, what sentence do you think is justified?
Not always a woman drone round the Milton interchange missed her turning carried on and drove through red lights and hit and killed a motorbike rider, non custodial a pittance of a punishment and if my memory serves me correct only a small driving ban. So a minimum custodial is not always a given right.Death by careless or dangerous driving. 2 years custodial would be the minimum O would expect.
Not always a woman drone round the Milton interchange missed her turning carried on and drove through red lights and hit and killed a motorbike rider, non custodial a pittance of a punishment and if my memory serves me correct only a small driving ban. So a minimum custodial is not always a given right.
Careless driving can't see it being a two year sentence, possibly custodial for dangerous. I guess from my perspective it has since emerged that this seems to be a problem with a system gone wrong causing the accident. I just hope things are being done to fix this.Death by careless or dangerous driving. 2 years custodial would be the minimum I would expect.
She has admitted to the offence so we know she caused the death by accidentally driving on the wrong side of the road, what sentence do you think is justified?
Yes, agree it is for court to decide, but my question was what you thought was justified? If you don't have a view, no worries, i was just curious.That is for the Court to decide, not her or her lawyers dictating what it can be as I explained.