bazzer9461
Level: Joey Beauchamp
(428 Apps, 79 Gls)
- Year of First Game
- 1968
Just hope their foreign office agree to the extradition or will trump try and gazing it.![]()
Harry Dunn crash death: US woman to be charged
Prosecutors said they had started extradition proceedings via the Home Office against Anne Sacoolas.www.bbc.co.uk
And rightly so...... justice takes time.
Its taken its time but it looks like some kind of justice will take place.
![]()
Harry Dunn death: Path clear for virtual trial, says foreign secretary
Dominic Raab says the UK can approach Anne Sacoolas's lawyers about holding some form of virtual trial.www.bbc.co.uk
Why?Because of the 'offence' or the fact that she went back to the US rather than stay.That seems the worse of both worlds. It is nice she is willing to serve a community service, how big of her. It should be 15000+ hours community service which involves her cleaning the streets and pavements in her state with a toothbrush.
The offence itself (particularly leaving thec scene) would usually result in an immediate custodial sentenceWhy?Because of the 'offence' or the fact that she went back to the US rather than stay.
The offence itself (particularly leaving thec scene) would usually result in an immediate custodial sentence
how is my comment incorrectIncorrect.
Triable on indictmentCausing death by dangerous driving – Sentencing
www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk
Maximum: 14 years’ custody.
Minimum disqualification of 2 years with compulsory extended re-test.
how is my comment incorrect
She didn't leave the scene, one of the falsehoods which have been reported.The offence itself (particularly leaving thec scene) would usually result in an immediate custodial sentence
Why?Because of the 'offence' or the fact that she went back to the US rather than stay.
For the offence or going back to the USA?That seems the worse of both worlds. It is nice she is willing to serve a community service, how big of her. It should be 15000+ hours community service which involves her cleaning the streets and pavements in her state with a toothbrush.
She has admitted to the offence so we know she caused the death by accidentally driving on the wrong side of the road, what sentence do you think is justified?It is the presumption that as she has gone back to the US she/her lawyers can dictate the type of sentence she gets if found guilty. That to me isn't justice.
Death by careless or dangerous driving. 2 years custodial would be the minimum I would expect.She has admitted to the offence so we know she caused the death by accidentally driving on the wrong side of the road, what sentence do you think is justified?
Not always a woman drone round the Milton interchange missed her turning carried on and drove through red lights and hit and killed a motorbike rider, non custodial a pittance of a punishment and if my memory serves me correct only a small driving ban. So a minimum custodial is not always a given right.Death by careless or dangerous driving. 2 years custodial would be the minimum O would expect.
Not always a woman drone round the Milton interchange missed her turning carried on and drove through red lights and hit and killed a motorbike rider, non custodial a pittance of a punishment and if my memory serves me correct only a small driving ban. So a minimum custodial is not always a given right.
Careless driving can't see it being a two year sentence, possibly custodial for dangerous. I guess from my perspective it has since emerged that this seems to be a problem with a system gone wrong causing the accident. I just hope things are being done to fix this.Death by careless or dangerous driving. 2 years custodial would be the minimum I would expect.
She has admitted to the offence so we know she caused the death by accidentally driving on the wrong side of the road, what sentence do you think is justified?
Yes, agree it is for court to decide, but my question was what you thought was justified? If you don't have a view, no worries, i was just curious.That is for the Court to decide, not her or her lawyers dictating what it can be as I explained.
Yes, agree it is for court to decide, but my question was what you thought was justified? If you don't have a view, no worries, i was just curious.
If convicted of Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, immediate custody is almost a certainty - if convicted of the same by Careless then yes Suspended Sentence Order would be possible"Usually result in an immediate custodial sentence"
And she didn`t leave the scene as she co-operated with the police and was breathalysed according to Wiki,
![]()
Death of Harry Dunn - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The mitigation of a good QC will see her sentence being non-custodial.
Depends on which offence she was actually prosecutedfor/convicted ofNot always a woman drone round the Milton interchange missed her turning carried on and drove through red lights and hit and killed a motorbike rider, non custodial a pittance of a punishment and if my memory serves me correct only a small driving ban. So a minimum custodial is not always a given right.
Careless Driving simpliciter is a non-custodial offence anywayCareless driving can't see it being a two year sentence, possibly custodial for dangerous. I guess from my perspective it has since emerged that this seems to be a problem with a system gone wrong causing the accident. I just hope things are being done to fix this.
She was found guilty I think it was death by reckless driving, she should have got a prison sentence especially how she kept on saying she drove through green lights so the motorbike rider wells going through red but witnesses said he went through on green, I missed it by 10 mins I had passed through Milton to drop the wife of in Sutton Courtney and when I returned I saw the emergency services and a tent up they were quickly on the scene but tragically it was to late in the motor bike riders life.Depends on which offence she was actually prosecutedfor/convicted of
She did abscond from the country after being told not too. Presumably that’s a crime in itself? (Not my area of expertise though)She didn't leave the scene, one of the falsehoods which have been reported.
Not if she had diplomatic immunityShe did abscond from the country after being told not too. Presumably that’s a crime in itself? (Not my area of expertise though)
Not if she had diplomatic immunity
I read that had she been tried in the UK, she would probably have not received a custodial sentence.The offence itself (particularly leaving thec scene) would usually result in an immediate custodial sentence
I guess from my perspective it has since emerged that there has been a number of driving incidents from people from that base. To me the most important thing (I'm obviously not Harry Dunns family so understand their battle for justice) is that the system is fixed more than individual punishment. Whether that is increased training for base personnel and/or increased warning signs in the area or something else. It seems to me the most important thing now is to minimise the chances of this happening again.I read that had she been tried in the UK, she would probably have not received a custodial sentence.
I am not sure how true this is but maybe its not as clear as you suggest?