National Politics 🟢 The Green Party

[Londox]

I’m amused by your pedantic emphasis on Polansky’s previous name like he’s committed some crime by changing it, while having happily posted numerous times about Tommy Robinson.

The reason I call him David Paulden is to mirror left-wing posters delighting in calling Tommy Robinson Stephen Yaxley-Lennon like they're in the secret knowing club.

The reason Tommy Robinson did it is he lived in Luton and was calling out radical Islam. Totally understandable for his safety he didn't want to use his own name.

I couldn't care less about Zack Polanski's name change but I find it highly amusing.

It's also quite funny how some posters label Tory/Reform MPs as 'dangerous' 'deluded' etc but give Zack Polanski a free pace, a man that would make this country a living hell.

 

[SteMerritt]

The reason Tommy Robinson did it is he lived in Luton and was calling out radical Islam. Totally understandable for his safety he didn't want to use his own name.

...and he wanted to conceal his criminal past.

 

[Sheik Djibouti]

...and he wanted to conceal his criminal past.

Didn't do a very good job at it though did he.

How long is his charge sheet these days.

You know you're really scaring the barrel when you defend a lowlife like Tommy Ten Names.

Says an awful lot about your mindset TravellingOx. Maybe you should stop feeling so sorry for yourself and stop crying about it on here so often and get out into the world and enjoy life

 

[m]

The reason I call him David Paulden is to mirror left-wing posters delighting in calling Tommy Robinson Stephen Yaxley-Lennon like they're in the secret knowing club.

The reason Tommy Robinson did it is he lived in Luton and was calling out radical Islam. Totally understandable for his safety he didn't want to use his own name.

I couldn't care less about Zack Polanski's name change but I find it highly amusing.

It's also quite funny how some posters label Tory/Reform MPs as 'dangerous' 'deluded' etc but give Zack Polanski a free pace, a man that would make this country a living hell.

Why do you spend so much time mirroring things you dislike?

 

[Londox]

Didn't do a very good job at it though did he.

How long is his charge sheet these days.

You know you're really scaring the barrel when you defend a lowlife like Tommy Ten Names.

Says an awful lot about your mindset TravellingOx. Maybe you should stop feeling so sorry for yourself and stop crying about it on here so often and get out into the world and enjoy life

No need to go that personal Sheik. I've never actually revealed what's wrong with me on here and I've never asked for anyone's pity. My condition makes it very difficult to enjoy life and get out into the world if you must know.

Tommy Robinson/Stephen Lennon is obviously an imperfect human being who has done bad things. He's also obviously come out of the football violence scene which is hard to defend.

I gave him the benefit of the doubt and listened to an hour or so long interview he did with triggernometry and he's certainly not unintelligent. Lots of what he said was purely factual and I think in his own mind he thinks what he's doing is for the benefit of his country. Ironically very similar to Zak/David.

Both men are not unintelligent and believe what they're doing benefits the country, but both are seen as fringe lunatics by the other side.

As far as I'm aware Tommy has never gone quite as far as to think he can increase the size of women's breasts with mind control though.

 

[chuckbert]

The reason I call him David Paulden is to mirror left-wing posters delighting in calling Tommy Robinson Stephen Yaxley-Lennon like they're in the secret knowing club.

The reason Tommy Robinson did it is he lived in Luton and was calling out radical Islam. Totally understandable for his safety he didn't want to use his own name.

I couldn't care less about Zack Polanski's name change but I find it highly amusing.

It's also quite funny how some posters label Tory/Reform MPs as 'dangerous' 'deluded' etc but give Zack Polanski a free pace, a man that would make this country a living hell.

But TR is just a pseudonym. ZP formally changed his surname back to the family name from a couple of generations when they moved to Britain and were confronted by antisemitism. There was a more personal story about the first name.

 

[Carpy]

...and he wanted to conceal his criminal past.

I think in order to do this with any success you have to actually stop being a criminal once you change your name.

 

[Londox]

Because he knows Zia would absolutely wipe the floor with him.

"Taxing billionaires" with no concrete plan on how it's achievable, some green waffle when Britain is responsible for 1 per cent of global emissions, and trying to justify why mass migration is great.

It would have been one way traffic.

 

[EastSussexOx]

He has debated with zia several times on question time and by common consensus (outside the echo chamber of GB news) wiped the floor with him so much so that Zia complained about woke bias as he was being booed despite the fact the audience was picked based to be representative on opinion polls of the time, meaning there were a lot more Reform voters than Green voters in the audience. He is desperate to debate Nigel Farage but for some reason the trump whisperer keeps declining

 

[Londox]

He has debated with zia several times on question time and by common consensus (outside the echo chamber of GB news) wiped the floor with him so much so that Zia complained about woke bias as he was being booed despite the fact the audience was picked based to be representative on opinion polls of the time, meaning there were a lot more Reform voters than Green voters in the audience. He is desperate to debate Nigel Farage but for some reason the trump whisperer keeps declining

The common consensus is he wiped the floor with Zia

If you say so buddy.

Just seen a pig fly past my flat.

 

[tomoufc]

The common consensus is he wiped the floor with Zia

If you say so buddy.

Just seen a pig fly past my flat.

Pig this time, was it?

 

[EastSussexOx]

I know Reform types don't really do evidence but I tried to point out that Zack and Zia have debated before and during the debate Zack was cheered, Zia booed and through a hissy fit blaming a biased audience despite the audience having more Reform voters than Green due to the way BBC selects audience based on representation due to polling (at the time Reform were outpolling Greens 3to 1) so Zack receiving cheers and Reform boos in a reform dominated audience suggests his arguments were chiming with the audience. More broadly, the fallout from the show exposed Farage's strong links to Nathan Gill the Russian spy, whom Zia denied Nigel knowing during the programme, exposing him as ignorant lying or both given their close links have been well documented. I am sure you will find some Russian bot accounts or op eds from GBeebies that state that Zia wiped the floor with Zack, just as I could pull out some stories showing the opposite from left wing sources. So I will show you a right leaning paper (metro owned by daily mail) that conceded that Zack got the better of Zia https://metro.co.uk/2025/10/10/zack...rm-uks-zia-yusuf-partys-links-putin-24390295/

 

[Londox]

I know Reform types don't really do evidence but I tried to point out that Zack and Zia have debated before and during the debate Zack was cheered, Zia booed and through a hissy fit blaming a biased audience despite the audience having more Reform voters than Green due to the way BBC selects audience based on representation due to polling (at the time Reform were outpolling Greens 3to 1) so Zack receiving cheers and Reform boos in a reform dominated audience suggests his arguments were chiming with the audience. More broadly, the fallout from the show exposed Farage's strong links to Nathan Gill the Russian spy, whom Zia denied Nigel knowing during the programme, exposing him as ignorant lying or both given their close links have been well documented. I am sure you will find some Russian bot accounts or op eds from GBeebies that state that Zia wiped the floor with Zack, just as I could pull out some stories showing the opposite from left wing sources. So I will show you a right leaning paper (metro owned by daily mail) that conceded that Zack got the better of Zia https://metro.co.uk/2025/10/10/zack...rm-uks-zia-yusuf-partys-links-putin-24390295/

I know "green types" don't really do "living in reality" but not only is the Metro not a "right leaning paper" the article makes no claim Paulden won the debate.

 

[Londox]

Metro UK - Bias and Credibility

LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[EastSussexOx]

Happy to concede that Metro has been deemed neutral on most things and slightly left on social issues (every day is a school day) I am not city based so have never read it and made the wrong assumption based on the ownership of the paper. I suspect that if Zack and Zia debated again, both social and other forms of media will clip the comments and declare that each side was wiped the floor with the other and the likes of you and I will hear the debate and believe that the person that aligns with our political worldview has wiped the floor.

Given that is the case I wonder why Nigel is so keen to avoid debating Zack, could it be because he has rather more notable skeletons in his closet that his fanclub may not be too pleased to hear about than the nonstory about the boob whisperer (including some pretty worrying links to Russia, his grifting roles helping the rich avoid tax, being keen to block the Epstein files which implicate all of his political allies).

 

[West Oxon U’s]