Scotchegg
Level: Peter Foley
(321 Apps, 90 Gls)
- Season Ticket
- Yes
- Stand
- South Upper
The point that Polanski made about the difference between crime and the fear of crime is perfectly valid.
One house on a street of 100 is broken into. You have one actual victim but 99 others that share the fear of that crime. All feelings are valid but you have to deal with them differently.
There's no doubt that there has been a rise in antisemitism, and we have seen this borne out in some recent offences. But there has also been a rise in anti-islam beliefs and offences against Muslims.
It's not unreasonable to then say that we need to do more to stop the offending (against all) and the intolerance that raises the tensions and increases the fears of all. In fact, any other view point would be far more bizarre in my view.
Its also not unreasonable to want our police to be held to the highest standard. The law allows for reasonable force to be used, and when someone has used a knife to attack others, the use of force used to stop them can justifiably be higher. But kicking someone in the head after they've been subdued with a taser could be seen as excessive and it's not unreasonable that this should be reviewed, if only to exonerate those involved.
Nothing raised shows any symptom for terrorists either at the time or since, and the suggestion is ridiculous.
But sadly those who draw these conclusions do so because of their bias and ignorance.
One house on a street of 100 is broken into. You have one actual victim but 99 others that share the fear of that crime. All feelings are valid but you have to deal with them differently.
There's no doubt that there has been a rise in antisemitism, and we have seen this borne out in some recent offences. But there has also been a rise in anti-islam beliefs and offences against Muslims.
It's not unreasonable to then say that we need to do more to stop the offending (against all) and the intolerance that raises the tensions and increases the fears of all. In fact, any other view point would be far more bizarre in my view.
Its also not unreasonable to want our police to be held to the highest standard. The law allows for reasonable force to be used, and when someone has used a knife to attack others, the use of force used to stop them can justifiably be higher. But kicking someone in the head after they've been subdued with a taser could be seen as excessive and it's not unreasonable that this should be reviewed, if only to exonerate those involved.
Nothing raised shows any symptom for terrorists either at the time or since, and the suggestion is ridiculous.
But sadly those who draw these conclusions do so because of their bias and ignorance.


