• Oxford Green Energy

    Yellows Forum is DELIGHTED to announce a partnership with Oxford Green Energy, who become our sustainability partner.

    See here for more information, including a YF member discount.

Ex-Staff Gary Rowett

Player Photo

1.Gary Rowett

Position: Head Coach
Nationality: England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Departed: 23rd December 2025 | Departed Posts: 1st Post
Previous Clubs: Birmingham City (Interim), Millwall, Stoke City, Derby County, Birmingham City, Burton Albion
Instagram: garyrowett1
 
Last edited:
Some cognitive bias in there I'd say. We've only been beaten by more than a goal once this season in the league and twice dating back to March. This happened six times on the nine games before Rowett came in. We're far far more competitive now and will pick up points because we're in games.

Now I'm not saying that should be enough and have no problem if you think making a change is the best way for us to stay up, but let's not pretend it's anywhere near as bad as it was when Des was sacked.
I agree with that. Des is a manager who was special for Oxford and the bond with fans incredible. Towards the end I still backed him but things weren't working and it felt hopeless. Under GR we are competitive and - despite what others say - I don't have that feeling of where are our next three points coming from.

I thought George Elek's post was interesting that we are going back to being hard to beat first and foremost and trying to nick wins. Whether that gives us enough to get out of danger, I don't know. I dont know what else we can do though. We need to bolster CDM desperately and inject more energy there.
 
Were we really that tight and hard to beat against Norwich? It felt as if at times in the match they were slicing through us all too easily, but then couldn't take their chances.
I think @tatabanya is relying far too heavily on the stats rather than what can be seen with ones own eyes. The stats do says we've improved under Rowett and that we need a few chances to go our way and that this might turn the tide. But stats don't tell you how the likes of Norwich carve us open at will at times.
 
I think @tatabanya is relying far too heavily on the stats rather than what can be seen with ones own eyes. The stats do says we've improved under Rowett and that we need a few chances to go our way and that this might turn the tide. But stats don't tell you how the likes of Norwich carve us open at will at times.
They do though? The stats are just a reflection of the game. If a team carve you open at will and create anything then that's exactly what the stats will tell you. And I was at the game and, with my eyes, would question whether they did. They had 3 good chances to put the game to bed, but it was hardly wave after wave of threatening attack
 
Rowett is on thin ice with the majority. The next few games are massive after Ipswich as on paper they’re games we should be targeting versus poor sides in Swansea & Blackburn.

I hope the board have a list of 2/3 names if things go wrong so we are in a position to make a change over Christmas again if things go massively wrong.

Similar to last year.
Really? I would say it is far from a majority. On here it’s generally just the same few posters constantly repeating their views.
 
They do though? The stats are just a reflection of the game. If a team carve you open at will and create anything then that's exactly what the stats will tell you. And I was at the game and, with my eyes, would question whether they did. They had 3 good chances to put the game to bed, but it was hardly wave after wave of threatening attack
I know you were there, but xG doesn’t tell you why they failed to get qualify chances.

If you use Norwich as an example, did we limit them to 3 good chances through a solid midfield and good defensive work? Or was their attack so toothless that they wouldn’t turn the attacking play into clear cut chances?

This is what I think stats alone miss. You’re welcome to disagree.
 
I think there is general support for him, but I do think it's fair that people question where we're at.

We're in a worse position than we were at the same point last season (2 points less and in the relegation zone?) and GR doesn't get the benefit of that "new manager bounce" against a favourable set of early fixtures to steady the ship...carry on at the rate we are and equivalent little run to safety at the end of the season is going to need to be miraculous!

If we see early transfer movement in January then I guess that's a sign that they are backing GR - and you'd hope that is the case with all the talk of revisiting business that didn't quite get done in the summer etc.

Ultimately GR may see keeping us up for a second season as his greatest achievement all things considered...
 
We are going to need a spell or two of good form to get those results, but we managed that last season and we haven't had it yet this so hopefully a purple patch is round the corner.
As do all the other bottom 7 teams … and I dare say at least one from above that will drop like a stone (Charlton?). I would rather have Rowett steering than any of the alternatives (who are they?). Most games this season we are inferior in the majority of positions on the field … so we are asking a lot from Rowett to keep us up. I still believe If anyone can he can … but I don’t think for a minute it not going be a frustrating ride - but we knew that before a ball was kicked 🤷. I wasn’t happy with the starting lineup at Norwich, and I also think the changes were too late, BUT Rowett clearly sees a whole lot more than we do in the week, always makes a decent ‘argument’ for why he does things in interviews and generally sees games as most of us do - unlike a lot of the bullshit you hear from mangers. I also think he learns - he can only play the cards he’s dealt. The job is even harder with injuries to stand out players in the run up to the transfer window. Hopefully, Rowett has a budget and more(?) influence on who we bring in to maximise chance of us staying up. Too many bed wetters for me on here … which keeps me coming back 😂 COYY!
 
I know you were there, but xG doesn’t tell you why they failed to get qualify chances.

If you use Norwich as an example, did we limit them to 3 good chances through a solid midfield and good defensive work? Or was their attack so toothless that they wouldn’t turn the attacking play into clear cut chances?

This is what I think stats alone miss. You’re welcome to disagree.
Ok, but if over the course of the season, so with a much bigger data set, the stats continue to show that you aren’t being carved open at will by the opposition, surely there then becomes a point where it can’t just be every team you play against being bad?
 
Have you been to an away game recently?

People are turning and for good reason.

Well i was there on Wednesday and it would have been nice if the away end had turned in their numbers, it might have actually added a bit of noise to the occasion! There was a pocket of fans showing disconnect, but that was it.
 
Ok, but if over the course of the season, so with a much bigger data set, the stats continue to show that you aren’t being carved open at will by the opposition, surely there then becomes a point where it can’t just be every team you play against being bad?
I agree to a point, but there are other elements to consider as well. But when you get to the end of the season, it's too late by then. Hence why I think the eye test suggests defensively we don't look as unbreakable as a unit as we did last season. And offensively, we are extremely hit and miss. We have 1 striker that can score goals and against a Norwich team who we were more likely to have a close game against than Ipswich, he decided to start the striker probably least likely to score and persist with him into the 60th minute... I don't understand decisions like that.

I could be completely wrong, but I don't think GR knows how best to use the players at his disposal.
 
I don't think it's Ed Waldron who needs to listen, it's Tim Williams who needs to listen.

I don't disagree - although the comment about an overloaded attacking bunch of players and unbalanced squad, as quoted by GR after 'Boro, does point towards the HoR DEPT. The summer budget adjustment isn't Ed's fault; I'll just go back to the answers the senior management told the room at the Fans Forum ;-)

However, you're 100% right, Tim Williams is going to be the one who send us down IMO. His paymasters should have sorted that problem out some time ago.
 
I agree to a point, but there are other elements to consider as well. But when you get to the end of the season, it's too late by then. Hence why I think the eye test suggests defensively we don't look as unbreakable as a unit as we did last season. And offensively, we are extremely hit and miss. We have 1 striker that can score goals and against a Norwich team who we were more likely to have a close game against than Ipswich, he decided to start the striker probably least likely to score and persist with him into the 60th minute... I don't understand decisions like that.

I could be completely wrong, but I don't think GR knows how best to use the players at his disposal.
My guess is that he thought Duffy would start and he wanted to put loads of pressure on him on the ball. Darling’s also been caught out a few times this season.

I agree that GR needs to get a better grip on this squad, but would also agree with him that it’s a pretty imbalanced bunch. Queues of players of a certain type and a complete lack of others. I agree that he has to improve his own performance as our manager, but we’re a far cry from the lost cause that some seem to make out.
 
It is difficult to see how we survive from here but I'm up for the fight.

This is what its properly like supporting OUFC, punching above our weight scrapping away as the smallest club in the league! It's like the 90s again!

Survival this season and I reckon it'll be the last season of plucky little Oxford with the rumoured new investment and the stadium.

Bring it on!
It will be very difficult to stay up. But the bottom three this time last season all managed it. Quite a different league now though. Coventry were only above us on goal difference and below Luton!
Then Preston, Derby, Hull and Stoke have all recruited well and improved more than we have this season.
We did well to stay up but you need to build on that and we haven't. I hope we can turn it around but it's looking bleak.
 
It will be very difficult to stay up. But the bottom three this time last season all managed it. Quite a different league now though. Coventry were only above us on goal difference and below Luton!
Then Preston, Derby, Hull and Stoke have all recruited well and improved more than we have this season.
We did well to stay up but you need to build on that and we haven't. I hope we can turn it around but it's looking bleak.
I don't think it's looking bleak at all. We've just drawn with Middlesbrough, it's not like we've lost five in a row.
 
I wish we went for 3 points against Norwich and then setup for a draw Ipswich but we didn’t so tomorrow’s lineup will be interesting.
 
I think there is general support for him, but I do think it's fair that people question where we're at.

We're in a worse position than we were at the same point last season (2 points less and in the relegation zone?) and GR doesn't get the benefit of that "new manager bounce" against a favourable set of early fixtures to steady the ship...carry on at the rate we are and equivalent little run to safety at the end of the season is going to need to be miraculous!

If we see early transfer movement in January then I guess that's a sign that they are backing GR - and you'd hope that is the case with all the talk of revisiting business that didn't quite get done in the summer etc.

Ultimately GR may see keeping us up for a second season as his greatest achievement all things considered...
It's hardly the case of backing GR right or wrong surely it is desirable that the team gets the reinforcements it needs within spending parameters.
 
Does the club still employ a sports psychologist? I’m not sure how effective they actually are but I know some athletes in various disciplines, particularly tennis, use them. In our position we should leave no stone unturned to gain an advantage.

Some positive mental attitude would definitely not go amiss.
 
Does the club still employ a sports psychologist? I’m not sure how effective they actually are but I know some athletes in various disciplines, particularly tennis, use them. In our position we should leave no stone unturned to gain an advantage.

Some positive mental attitude would definitely not go amiss.
If you're referring to Gary Bloom, then he's long gone. One of Karl's ideas. The man was a charlatan and laughed at (behind his back, ofc) by just about everyone in the building
 
Back
Top Bottom