- Year of First Game
- 1998
![]() |
![]() |
And we were very much in both of those games too, despite playing poorly for the first half of both.- It's really just two inexplicably bad home performances (Pompey and QPR - 5 goals conceded too) away from play-off form.
Bristol City too - how we didn't win that after leading against 10 players...And we were very much in both of those games too, despite playing poorly for the first half of both.
Thankfully we corrected that somewhat against Watford.Bristol City too - how we didn't win that after leading against 10 players...
That table really is amazing, didn't for one moment think it was so good.Correct. The below is more accurate.
- 1.43ppg (66 points over a season).
- Just 23 goals conceded in 21 games, and just 10 in 11 away games.
- It's really just two inexplicably bad home performances (Pompey and QPR - 5 goals conceded too) away from play-off form.
View attachment 26527
I think the Hull away game plays heavily on my mind. But the manager can’t help it if the normally reliable goalie lets one in at the near post.And we were very much in both of those games too, despite playing poorly for the first half of both.
Championship Table 'position', since their respective (latest) managerial appointments:
Stoke (under Robins) - 12th.
Derby (under Eustace) - 12th.
Plymouth (under Muslic) - 14th.
Hull (under Selles) - 15th.
Cardiff (under Riza) - 19th.
Luton (under Bloomfield) - 24th.
Oxford (under Rowett) - 8th.
A change of manager usually sees some uplift, but we've undoubtedly played a blinder here...
Championship Table 'position', since their respective (latest) managerial appointments:
Stoke (under Robins) - 12th.
Derby (under Eustace) - 12th.
Plymouth (under Muslic) - 14th.
Hull (under Selles) - 15th.
Cardiff (under Riza) - 19th.
Luton (under Bloomfield) - 24th.
Oxford (under Rowett) - 8th.
A change of manager usually sees some uplift, but we've undoubtedly played a blinder here...
Our turnover in League One for year ending June 2024 was £8.4m and I believe our budget for this season was £17m with more to come next season. @Colin B is likely to know better than me.Are you suggesting our player budget will be 20M even though our revenue is about 10M?
If you take in all those extra season ticket sales with extra TV money and other revenues I think it will cover a hell of a lot of the extra expenditure. We don’t spend massive amounts on wages and transfer fees although we have done so by our own standards.Our turnover in League One for year ending June 2024 was £8.4m and I believe our budget for this season was £17m with more to come next season. @Colin B is likely to know better than me.
As someone said we have an Indonesian market we can tap into and once safe it would be great to see Marcelino given a game. I know it turns it into a bit of a circus but the lad plays for his country and we have loads of followers as a result.
And this is the reason I don’t think wholesale changes is the answer.Championship Table 'position', since their respective (latest) managerial appointments:
Stoke (under Robins) - 12th.
Derby (under Eustace) - 12th.
Plymouth (under Muslic) - 14th.
Hull (under Selles) - 15th.
Cardiff (under Riza) - 19th.
Luton (under Bloomfield) - 24th.
Oxford (under Rowett) - 8th.
A change of manager usually sees some uplift, but we've undoubtedly played a blinder here...
That’s the type of fee we will need to spend in the summer. I think he will be available for less than that. Only 1 year left on deal and can’t handle be structured over the contract with a sell on feeRowett has almost certainly saved us. I was furious when Des was sacked. But the Board got it right.
Not sure we'll be able to afford Matos. £1.5-2.0M?
Our turnover in League One for year ending June 2024 was £8.4m and I believe our budget for this season was £17m with more to come next season. @Colin B is likely to know better than me.
In that case isn't it about balancing the loss of said players to the team with the ability to refresh with similar whilst there seems no pressure to recompense the owners in the short term.Yes, that's not far off, for our budget.
It's worth bearing in mind that the extra money for being in The Championship is a minimum £10m, so our extra expenditure, without taking the stadium into account, will likely roughly balance with this.
Another thing to consider is that we need to get back to being a bit more of a trading club, and return to our previous model of buying playing assets, as that seems to have dried up over the last couple of years. The rewards for selling promising young players with Championship experience are far greater than they were in League One and Two, and it's possible to wipe out a couple of years' losses at a stroke with one big sale, or a handful of slightly lesser ones. But we need to be a Championship club to benefit fully from this. It's really a case of doing what we've previously done very successfully, but at a higher level.
I'm not 100% sure what you're saying there mate?In that case isn't it about balancing the loss of said players to the team with the ability to refresh with similar whilst there seems no pressure to recompense the owners in the short term.
What's the point of selling talented players if you don't think you can reasonably replace them and also if there is no pressure to repay loans/subsidies from owners.I'm not 100% sure what you're saying there mate?
Yes agree,Possibly tougher in that you might get the bigger fish after our better players. There are a few that we only brought in last July/August I would like to see gone and better replacements coming in.
I think we have to be able to replace any of our players. They aren’t Messi.What's the point of selling talented players if you don't think you can reasonably replace them and also if there is no pressure to repay loans/subsidies from owners.
Ah, OK.What's the point of selling talented players if you don't think you can reasonably replace them and also if there is no pressure to repay loans/subsidies from owners.
Great pun there!Yes agree,
I’d probably be looking to move on players/loan players out like
El-Mizouni
Sibley
Bennett
Thorniley
Josh Mc
Ruben
They are off the top of my head and I can probably see Moore going too.
Tend to agree with that.Yes agree,
I’d probably be looking to move on players/loan players out like
El-Mizouni
Sibley
Bennett
Thorniley
Josh Mc
Ruben
They are off the top of my head and I can probably see Moore going too.
The other thing that should be happening, is that we see more of our young players come through , as investment in the youth set up seems to have increased a lot year on year.Yes, that's not far off, for our budget.
It's worth bearing in mind that the extra money for being in The Championship is a minimum £10m, so our extra expenditure, without taking the stadium into account, will likely roughly balance with this.
Another thing to consider is that we need to get back to being a bit more of a trading club, and return to our previous model of buying playing assets, as that seems to have dried up over the last couple of years. The rewards for selling promising young players with Championship experience are far greater than they were in League One and Two, and it's possible to wipe out a couple of years' losses at a stroke with one big sale, or a handful of slightly lesser ones. But we need to be a Championship club to benefit fully from this. It's really a case of doing what we've previously done very successfully, but at a higher level.
Bennett played well in Saturday band was my MoM and probably a few others.Yes agree,
I’d probably be looking to move on players/loan players out like
El-Mizouni
Sibley
Bennett
Thorniley
Josh Mc
Ruben
They are off the top of my head and I can probably see Moore going too.
Ah, OK.
Yes, absolutely on your first point. It needs to be, as it was previously, something of a conveyor belt with sales and signings. A good example is what we did with our centre halves, where, as Dickie was sold, McNally was already in the building, and when he was sold Atkinson was already in the building. Each time a small six figure sum was spent on a player and a sum between £1m and £2m was received.
On your second point, surely it's better to be self sufficient than relying on loans, no matter who they're from? Eventually we'll reach the ceiling for Championship level losses under EFL regulations, and loans will not be any use, whereas player trading profit will be able to go straight back into the budget.
Spot onI think we have to be able to replace any of our players. They aren’t Messi.
The income helps you spend more whilst complying with financial fair play rules.
Plus £10m made from player sales is £10m we don’t have to go cap in hand to our owners for.
I don’t mind lending a mate a tenner but I’ll get tired of lending him a tenner a week pretty quickly, especially if I see him buying a round before paying me back because I “wasn’t that fussed about repayment”
Turgid tripe a la Rowett is what's on the menu if you dine at Chez Gary.
I think El Miz and Sibley were recruited with Des’ quite specific ‘reverse mullet’ formation in mind - both sort of attacking 8s, without the discipline or instinct to do much defensively, but without sufficient skill to play as a lone 10 in the Championship. Rowett clearly doesn’t fancy them at all, I reckon they’ll be gone.Tend to agree with that.
Presumably we will be looking to move 7 to 8 out and replace them.
The only thing will be whether the coaching staff still think that El Mizouni has the potential that they thought he had and whether he could contribute far more next season?
Leigh/ Bennett also maybe a close call ( although age and injuries could go against Bennett)