I'll start.
Right wing bias.
Why is "unlawfully" in inverted commas when it's a fact?
View attachment 5678
It was corrected. Why did it happen in the first place?Covid: Matt Hancock acted unlawfully over pandemic contracts
The health secretary breached his "legal obligation" to publish details of deals, the High Court rules.www.bbc.co.uk
View attachment 5679
Not sure about your image, but it's not in quotes on the BBC Website on the actual story.
So no bias.
They put it in quotation marks because the article was quoting the judgement. Nothing to see here. The second article was an update.It was corrected. Why did it happen in the first place?
He's not resigning anyway, they've no fear from anyone I'm afraid. What a pile of shite we've been lumbered with!
I once thought that but I'm no so sure now. It seems in the past year or so that it has started to 'go easier' on those that ultimately control its future.People think the BBC’s biased simply because they don’t support their views.
What they’re failing to realise is they’re not supporting any view.
Agreed. I think people's perceptions have been further skewed because it is so easy to get into 'echo chamber' social media where you interact with people who have similar views to you - no matter how odd those might be - so it's a bit of a shock when people have to face what are largely well researched and sometimes inconvenient 'facts' (if anyone remembers what those are any more!).People think the BBC’s biased simply because they don’t support their views.
What they’re failing to realise is they’re not supporting any view.
Agreed. I think people's perceptions have been further skewed because it is so easy to get into 'echo chamber' social media where you interact with people who have similar views to you - no matter how odd those might be - so it's a bit of a shock when people have to face what are largely well researched and sometimes inconvenient 'facts' (if anyone remembers what those are any more!).
Handcock lies and an emaciated BBC doesn't challenge him. @Essexyellows swallows Hancock's lies and round we go again.A place @QR knows only too well.
MH on Andrew Marr this morning basically said "The paperwork was 2 weeks late which was better than people dying".
Shame he was right and the facts are inconvenient.
So he posted ”fake” news?Covid: Matt Hancock acted unlawfully over pandemic contracts
The health secretary breached his "legal obligation" to publish details of deals, the High Court rules.www.bbc.co.uk
View attachment 5679
Not sure about your image, but it's not in quotes on the BBC Website on the actual story.
So no bias.
Not so the BBC’s tweet is still there.So he posted ”fake” news?
You quote someone when you are putting distance between you and them as you are unsure if what they are saying is true. This is a fact. Also, if that is so why do later news reports not include the quotation marks?Well there you go - they are quoting what the High Court has ruled. It's not the same thing at all as putting quote marks around things to imply you don't believe them.
Handcock lies and an emaciated BBC doesn't challenge him. @Essexyellows swallows Hancock's lies and round we go again.
Handcock lies and an emaciated BBC doesn't challenge him. @Essexyellows swallows Hancock's lies and round we go again.
You can do. But you also put quotation marks around phrases when you are simply quoting them, hence their name! It's a bit odd to presume that the BBC are doing the former, without seeming to consider that they are using them in the more normal way!You quote someone when you are putting distance between you and them as you are unsure if what they are saying is true. This is a fact. Also, if that is so why do later news reports not include the quotation marks?
A place @QR knows only too well.
MH on Andrew Marr this morning basically said "The paperwork was 2 weeks late which was better than people dying".
Shame he was right and the facts are inconvenient.