End of the world...or unseasonable weather

We,ve only been keeping records for 100 years or so.....climate change is a load of old b*****s,the climates been changing for millions of years......tchhh
 
Umm. So I was at an oil industry conference this week. And believe me we are taking it very, very seriously. There was talk about 1.5, never mind 2
 
My understanding (limited) is that Ice Ages come around in cycles, and we are over due the last one by 5000 years.
6000 years ago we started clearing trees for farming on a large scale which fractionally raised the temperature of the earth, preventing the last Ice Age from happening. The Earth has been slowly warming ever since, with an acceleration since the industrial revolution.

I'm not a scientist, and this is not my field of expertise
 
Is there a thing a few middle class westerners can do to halt a change caused by 5,000 years of human “progress”, in a world with an increasing population mostly in the non western areas? Is anyone really willing to make the changes necessary to at least arrest it? How do you force billions of people to live poorer lives around the world?

If it is happening nothing can be done about it so it’s a bit pointless worrying about it, might as well wear shorts and sunglasses and enjoy it rather than put a coat on and moan about it.
 
I can't claim to endorse this or not, but nonetheless, a rebuttal of sorts. Rather let down by the Trump stuff at the bottom though.
 
Is there a thing a few middle class westerners can do to halt a change caused by 5,000 years of human “progress”, in a world with an increasing population mostly in the non western areas? Is anyone really willing to make the changes necessary to at least arrest it? How do you force billions of people to live poorer lives around the world?

If it is happening nothing can be done about it so it’s a bit pointless worrying about it, might as well wear shorts and sunglasses and enjoy it rather than put a coat on and moan about it.
Theres a huge amount that countries and industries can do to change things- like the Green New Deal posited here and in the US - hugely investing in recyclable energy and cutting back on Carbon,. Will I listen to 99 per cent of scientists around the worlg or the bloke who draws Dilbert? that's not a rebuttal of any sort.
 
Surely, if there is even the slightest chance that the scientists are even slightly right, then it is sensible to take steps. If by some chance they are all wrong, then we will have cut down on what we know are harmful emissions, saved rainforests and preserved some of the fossil fuel reserves for the future, as well as developing cheaper cleaner technologies. If on the other hand they are right, we will have gone some way to ensuring that our children and grandchildren have somewhere halfway decent to live.

It's all to easy to find someone to rebut anything (evolution, moon landings, the shape of the earth etc etc) but using that as an excuse to put your fingers in your ears, deride anything that you don't want to hear and to just carry on doing the wrong thing because you don't want it to be true is selfish childishness of the highest order. (I'm looking at you Agent Orange!!!)
 
Theres a huge amount that countries and industries can do to change things- like the Green New Deal posited here and in the US - hugely investing in recyclable energy and cutting back on Carbon,. Will I listen to 99 per cent of scientists around the worlg or the bloke who draws Dilbert? that's not a rebuttal of any sort.
The Green New Deal is a wonderful piece of satire. Truly wonderful.

If AOC had spent time proof reading it, understanding how us proles live our lives and more globally, it might get to something worth it. As it is, it's impractical and naive. And insanely expensive.

No ta. Would rather we focus on working on getting countries like India and China to be better custodians of the world!
 
Is there a thing a few middle class westerners can do to halt a change caused by 5,000 years of human “progress”, in a world with an increasing population mostly in the non western areas? Is anyone really willing to make the changes necessary to at least arrest it? How do you force billions of people to live poorer lives around the world?

If it is happening nothing can be done about it so it’s a bit pointless worrying about it, might as well wear shorts and sunglasses and enjoy it rather than put a coat on and moan about it.

^^^this..... "we" are piddling into the wind...
 
The Green New Deal is a wonderful piece of satire. Truly wonderful.

If AOC had spent time proof reading it, understanding how us proles live our lives and more globally, it might get to something worth it. As it is, it's impractical and naive. And insanely expensive.

No ta. Would rather we focus on working on getting countries like India and China to be better custodians of the world!
Im with you re getting the likes of India &China to comply &adhere to agreements about pollution etc @Gary Baldi , however , its probably just me who would be concerned that either or both india &china would prove to be similar custodians of the world as our slum landlord is as (self appointed) custodian of oufc ? ;)
 
Umm that was weather! There is a difference between day to day weather and longer term climate trends. As you well know!
Very true. It was an extreme weather event and these are becoming more frequent year on year around the world. Just because we had well below average temperatures for over a month, it doesn't mean the overall climate is not getting warmer.
 
^^^this..... "we" are piddling into the wind...

Well this planet is f**ked then if all countries take that attitude.

By investing in and developing clean energy that effects what we do reducing our impact on the world. Already due to moves (brought about by the EU) on energy efficiency in things like Vacuums, White Goods etc has had a real impact in the UK/EU. Those standards will ultimately travel around the world.

Investment in carbon capture etc is also important with studies like this displaying interesting possibilities whilst being practical:


Investment by a few countries in a number of technologies have driven others to follow (going back to railways as an example) so there is no reason so this could easily be the case with China/India.

Doing nothing isn't an option and getting in early on these technologies can be very good for the economy (as China have done with Solar panels etc).
 
I find it hard to be critical of China and India modernising as quickly as they can. It's exactly what we started doing 250 years ago.I suppose the difference is that in 1750 we couldn't possibly have envisaged future carnage, whereas China and India can.
The problem is twofold. One, the scale of the change is vastly different in terms of population size and land mass, and secondly it's a heavy anchor to the frippery of what the UK can do. We can turn the lights of each week, but when China are happily investing in coal power stations, it makes our efforts rather moot.
 
Back
Top Bottom