International News Covid-19 .....

Having looked a little more closely at that picture, it's evident that these people aren't going anywhere - they're coming.

(which means they must all have tested negative in the 72hrs prior to travel.....)
😂 love your confidence
 
How do we see this playing out with news the foreign (SA etc) variants are approximately 50% resistant to vaccine.

Best will in the world you can't keep them out forever.

Understand that vaccines can be amended with 6 weeks lead time.

Are we ever going to go back to how we were before?
 

WHO Finally Admits COVID-19 PCR Test Has a ‘Problem’​

The WHO’s new guidance, which includes lower PCR thresholds, almost guarantees COVID “case” numbers will automatically drop dramatically around the world.
In an “inauguration” of its own while Joe Biden was being sworn into office, the World Health Organization (WHO) initiated new rules regarding the PCR assays used for testing for COVID-19.
Even though they’ve been widely used across the U.S. and around the world to determine who has a positive case of COVID, PCR assays are not designed to be used as diagnostic tools, as they can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and “live” or reproductive ones.
Besides that, previously, the WHO had recommended 45 “amplification” cycles of the test to determine whether someone was positive for COVID or not.
The thing is, the more cycles that a test goes through, the more likely that a false positive will come up — anything over 30 cycles actually magnifies the samples so much that even insignificant sequences of viral DNA end up being magnified to the point that the test reads positive even if your viral load is extremely low or the virus is inactive and poses no threat to you or anyone else.
What that means in plain language is that the more cycles a test goes through, the more false positives that are reported.
Now, with the WHO’s lower PCR thresholds, it’s practically guaranteed that COVID “case” numbers will automatically drop dramatically around the world.
Here’s in-part what the WHO notice says:
Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.

clive de carle​

carolines cottage, rudge lane, oare, wilts sn84jh​
 
It's just pathetic. Idiot conspiracy theories propagated by social misfits running the likes of the Corbett Report and lapped up by the easily-influenced like Neville.

Doesn't he get that some of these theories are actually dangerous, trying to persuade others that Covid is an exaggeration, if not an outright lie?

We're all wrong you know. Neville knows the truth.
 
It's just pathetic. Idiot conspiracy theories propagated by social misfits running the likes of the Corbett Report and lapped up by the easily-influenced like Neville.

Doesn't he get that some of these theories are actually dangerous, trying to persuade others that Covid is an exaggeration, if not an outright lie?

We're all wrong you know. Neville knows the truth.
Glad to see him called out in Paul B’s fans view
 
Back
Top Bottom