The forum would encourage all members to consider joining OxVox during this important moment in our history. See here for more information.
It's was very awkward to watch. I felt sorry for Sarri. I think the keeper acted out being injured with cramp. Sarri believed him and thought a keeper with cramp would not be good for a pen shootout.
How is that even allowed to happen? If you are subbed you would think that you have to go off, we are now in the position where players can decide they are staying on and that’s that, should be in the rules that they have to go off.
Massively disrespectful to his manager, his position is now untenable after that as it’s obvious the players don’t respect him, he will be gone soon.
How is that even allowed to happen? If you are subbed you would think that you have to go off, we are now in the position where players can decide they are staying on and that’s that, should be in the rules that they have to go off.
Massively disrespectful to his manager, his position is now untenable after that as it’s obvious the players don’t respect him, he will be gone soon.
I feel for Sarri. In the eyes of many he’s made and making errors (playing Kante where he does boggles everyone’s mind but his own) but he’s not deserving of a player power grab like that from Kepa. Imagine if Schmeichel or Van Der Sar had done that at Man United. No matter who the player was, SAF would have binned them instantly.
The thing is Kepa cost £75m. You can’t just sack or drop a player like that. What do you do? Suck it up and accept that Kepa is done as a Chelsea player (flogging him to the a well paid but miserable existence at some Chinese PL side would be a fitting career stifling punishment) or attempt to mediate between him and Sarri.
People talk about the football bubble bursting. Maybe just maybe we’re on the cusp of seeing that.
I think the keeper genuinely had some kind of twinge which Sarri thought could impair him during the penalty shoot out.
There was only a minute or so of extra time left to play, so Sarri had to make a quick decision which was to replace Kepa. Sarri wasn’t planning on substituting Kepa for tactical reasons, he was doing it because he thought Kepa was injured.
Kepa upon seeing that the manager wanted to substitute him responded by not coming off as he felt he was alright to carry on, so this wasn’t a case of a manager wanting to substitute a player for tactical reasons. Having said that, no matter what Kepa thought, he should have come off or at least had the decency to speak to Sarri on the touchline.
Just a very unfortunate situation which should never have happened, which I think wouldn’t have if there was more time on the clock to go as Sarri/player could have seen if he was ok to carry on. Also, it was the second time he had gone down with a twinge/cramp etc.
There was a no win situation. If Chelsea had gone on to win the cup with Kepa being the hero then further questions would be raised about Sarri or like what happened, Chelsea lose with Kepa having missed an easy save etc. Also, this wasn’t about player power. I personally feel that there was something wrong with Kepa (twinge/cramp etc), but he wanted to stay on to see out the whole game and possibly be the hero for them in the penalty shoot out.
The whole situation was hyped up by the media because of Sarri’s current status. I wonder if the same reaction would have been if it was Pep Guardiola!
I don’t think the media have to do much hyping on this one, I watched a player refused to be substituted live on tv, whether he was injured or not it wasn’t his decision to make.
How much do you have to pay someone to follow a simple, reasonable instruction? Obviously more than £5 million a year.
That's fine if the manager wants to keep the uninjured Messi on. But if the manager wants to sub him once he knows he is uninjured then the player should leave the pitch with as much grace as he can muster. Not just stay on and refuse to be subbed.What if a manager thought that Messi was injured to then find out he’s okay? Then Messi informs the manager that he’s ok to play on.
That's fine if the manager wants to keep the uninjured Messi on. But if the manager wants to sub him once he knows he is uninjured then the player should leave the pitch with as much grace as he can muster. Not just stay on and refuse to be subbed.
But he only wanted to sub him because he thought he was injured.
Don’t get me wrong, I think the player was disrespectful and should have gone off or at least gone and spoken to Sarri, that way he (Sarri) May have changed his mind.
Bullshit. Kepa has been timeswasting criminally all game and the "injury" was cramp. Hes a goalkeeper FFS! If Sarri thought it was a genuine injury...Christ there are no words
Why did Sarri want to take him off for then?
Isn't it obvious?
If your man city heading into penalties would you rather face kepa, or a keeper with a reputation for penalties who knows your players inside out having played for you for years?