-
Take part in the forum age vote here
Callum O'Dowda
- Thread starter Ncnsbcfc
- Start date
holdsteady
Well-known member
99%, just forward it on now to save time.
LeftSideBoy
Yellow Army Member
Based on the dealings of our previous owner, I am going to hazard a guess that no sell on was added, in favour of him making more upfront from the initial transfer. The same can and will be said for Roofe. Snake.
RCYellowRC
Well-known member
Yes there is a sell on fortunately for us!
BarrySpang
Active member
30%
Just read article that says its 30%, but dont know if it's true. Would be good if correct.
www.google.com
Oxford insisted on a smart clause before Callum O'Dowda's Championship transfer
Good thinking
www.google.com
Mellowyellow
RIP
BCFC fans always welcome, it's the gas that smells.
IsleofWightYellow
Well-known member
Gutted, thought we were getting him back on loan
dickwalton1964
Well-known member
£8m seems cheap to me. Good age, international, I’d have thought £10m minimum.
Grumpy Git
Well-known member
Just hope the club not the previous owner gets the money.
You'd have thought that seeing as COD was developed by the club and not purchased by DE, we would get the money?
outsidethebox
Well-known member
I'll have whatever you've been drinking for breakfast - much as I agree with the sentiment!
Keepitreal
Junior Member
I believe the sell on is for between 25-30%. I have heard from a few ITK people that Eales gets to pocket most of that as part of his sale to Tiger - a shame if true bearing in mind COD came through our youth ranks, we invested in his development and our current set up could really do with a few million to spend. Not that I think it will happen, but the worse case scenario is COD runs his contract down completely, Eales gets nothing and the lad moves on a free.
Sheik djibouti
Well-known member
If it is true about Eales trousering the SOC on O'Dowda, and IF you want to blame anyone for OUFC not benefitting from it, then look no further than Tiger.
It was he after all who did the deal with Eales when "buying" the club....because he didn't have the bunce up front and couldn't get the deal done any other way.
It's a bit like blaming Kassam entirely for the ridiculous Stadium deal the Merry agreed to....again when he and backers didn't have the money to buy the stadium.
It was he after all who did the deal with Eales when "buying" the club....because he didn't have the bunce up front and couldn't get the deal done any other way.
It's a bit like blaming Kassam entirely for the ridiculous Stadium deal the Merry agreed to....again when he and backers didn't have the money to buy the stadium.
DorsetYelloww
Active member
Presumably even if Eales does get money, it will be another chunk paid towards what is owed overall anyway?
Gary Baldi
Well-known member
Eales will take the money stated in the agreement with Tiger, up to a certain limit. Presumably the amount of money will be such that it could well clear off what remains and leave something for the club.
My understanding is the money goes to the club not Eales but as and when we get additional income like this from the signings he was involved in we pay a bigger percentage of the debt we owe him back. The money we owe him is a loan so it’s a larger payment off this. So we will get some of the income to re-use in this seasons budget but a large amount of the loan will be paid off. So indirectly we do get all of the money but not all to use it reduces our debt more than anything...
BigAlan
Well-known member
He will be ill.
