Sensible cut back in my opinion, and something the Conservatives never would have dared do.I see Rachel Reeves is removing the £300 fuel support for pensioners unless they have pension credit. Brings a new meaning to helping those at the bottom of the income scale
Just got back from Oxfam, there was a queue for blanketsI see Rachel Reeves is removing the £300 fuel support for pensioners unless they have pension credit. Brings a new meaning to helping those at the bottom of the income scale
My parents have spent it on decent claret for the past few years. No reason they shouldn’t have done so but even they said it was ridiculous they received it.I see Rachel Reeves is removing the £300 fuel support for pensioners unless they have pension credit. Brings a new meaning to helping those at the bottom of the income scale
Those of us that are on a limited income will suffer, not a sensible cut back in my opinion.Sensible cut back in my opinion, and something the Conservatives never would have dared do.
Those that struggle to make ends meet should still get it
What about charging all convicted prisoners for board and lodging instead of cutting the fuel payments?Means testing winter fuel payments seems perfectly reasonable considering the mess public finances are in.
There are other benefits available, Pension Credit isn't the only thing on offer for those pensioners struggling, and isn't the only thing that will qualify you for the WFA.Just looked up how much pension credit is which is i think the new criteria for WFA.
tops up your income per week to £218 for singles, and £333 for couples.
£11,336 / £17,316 per annum.
normal state pension is £221 per week
not a lot to live on really and if you are just over the limit, £300 Winter Fuel Allowance will be very helpful.
Also should they get rid of some of the other benefits and make them means tested?
prescriptions / tv licence / bus travel / over 65 discounted OUFC season tickets etc?
Which presumably a new Government could unfreeze if they were so minded.The Conservatives didn’t help by freezing the tax allowance of £12570pa a few years ago and it’s frozen till 2028
Winter fuel allowance is only necessary because basic state pension is so shockingly low. These are problems that are going to take years to fix. What a state for relatively rich country to get itself into.I see Rachel Reeves is removing the £300 fuel support for pensioners unless they have pension credit. Brings a new meaning to helping those at the bottom of the income scale
they could, unfortunately the money "gained' by doing so has already been spent elsewhere.Which presumably a new Government could unfreeze if they were so minded.
Winter fuel allowance is only necessary because basic state pension is so shockingly low. These are problems that are going to take years to fix. What a state for relatively rich country to get itself into.
I'm not sure the waspi women would agree with that.It's not just Britain, though.
The US is now in an estimated $4 trillion pension hole i.e. their estimated obligations to retirees are $4 trillion more than they currently have the money for. That's roughly equivalent to the GDP of Germany.
People are living longer and longer across the world, but retiring at roughly the same age as they used to. And in a lot of the largest world economies, the birth rate has fallen substantially under 2. The pensions maths has stopped working.
If you'd been working the fields in Spain you'd probably have a much lower life expectancy.The pension paid in the U.K. is a fraction of that paid in Spain. What’s more their retirement age is around ten years before ours
Not all pensioners are at the bottom of the income scale, that's the point. Some have income from multiple properties, interest on savings, not to mention private pensions.I see Rachel Reeves is removing the £300 fuel support for pensioners unless they have pension credit. Brings a new meaning to helping those at the bottom of the income scale
Winter fuel allowance is only necessary because basic state pension is so shockingly low. These are problems that are going to take years to fix. What a state for relatively rich country to get itself into.
The Norwegian Government Pension Fund - funded by Oil and Gas Reserves (as opposed to the British model of blowing it) - is valued at 18,525,640,368,418NOK (approx £1,309,063,121,745). Enough to pay 1.5million people £30k/year for 30 years at present - though it is constantly growing (in the time taken to write this it has inceased in value by £14million).If you'd been working the fields in Spain you'd probably have a much lower life expectancy.
Would be interested to know the comparison of what you / employer contribute and the same in Spain.
cost of living probably a lot less in Spain
Also our (UK) state pension is unfunded, so our (workers) NIC just goes to the general tax pot.
Other countries have huge state pension funds, but i don't know who eventually benefits.
So the North Sea Oil revenues went to the pension fund for other countries, presumably they have much smaller populations.
Blowing it or investing it in the pension funds of a few. Depends on your perspective.The Norwegian Government Pension Fund - funded by Oil and Gas Reserves (as opposed to the British model of blowing it) - is valued at 18,525,640,368,418NOK (approx £1,309,063,121,745). Enough to pay 1.5million people £30k/year for 30 years at present - though it is constantly growing (in the time taken to write this it has inceased in value by £14million).
The fund | Norges Bank Investment Management
The purpose of the fund is to safeguard and build financial wealth for current and future generations based on revenue from Norway's oil and gas resources.www.nbim.no
the 1% are very important here.Blowing it or investing it in the pension funds of a few. Depends on your perspective.
I'm not sure the waspi women would agree with that.
Is the USA black hole in private or public pensions? Public pensions here are funded from in year tax receipts so there are no assets backing them up. The kind of short sightedness that is always politically attractive but economically insane.
I see Rachel Reeves is removing the £300 fuel support for pensioners unless they have pension credit. Brings a new meaning to helping those at the bottom of the income scale
Just looked up how much pension credit is which is i think the new criteria for WFA.
tops up your income per week to £218 for singles, and £333 for couples.
£11,336 / £17,316 per annum.
normal state pension is £221 per week
not a lot to live on really and if you are just over the limit, £300 Winter Fuel Allowance will be very helpful.
Also should they get rid of some of the other benefits and make them means tested?
prescriptions / tv licence / bus travel / over 65 discounted OUFC season tickets etc?
But there is a vast majority of pensioners, my parents included , who went without , worked and paid taxes all there lives , are just about getting by and have never claimed benefits who lose out by this .There are many pensioners who are doing pretty well with recent state pension rises on top of their additional personal pensions. I deal with many wealthy pensioners who wouldn't even notice the difference if they lost their state pension.
This is a good decision in my opinion, and I include my dear old mother in that category who really didn't need this allowance.
Hopefully, many more things will become means tested to find further savings elsewhere.
Retirees with a personal income from savings/investments/property that pushes them into higher rates really do not need a full state pension.
Time to stop this thought process that every pensioner doesn't have a pot to P**s in. They are probably amongst the wealthiest generation, if truth be told.
Good on your RR.
Although I will concede that the cut off criteria is actually too narrow, but the principle is good.
Rubbish and frankly ageist that all pensioners are rolling in it .