Difficult to put this politely, but there's a lot of stuff there that frankly isn't true.
I want us to be in control of everything, from controlling our borders, who can come in, and who can’t.
Immigration was already largely in the hands of the UK government. Immigration from outside the EU is higher than from within (and we have complete control over non-EU immigration) and we didn't even use the controls on EU immigration that we could have done (EU immigrants can be removed after 6 months if they can't support themselves). Tony Blair could have limited the amount of immigration from Eastern Europe when they joined the EU, but he didn't. Theresa May chose to cut the border forces.
Rightly or wrongly, the government accepts immigration as an economic necessity. Brexit won't change that.
I don’t want people coming here in uncontrollable numbers, it driven the wages down for a number of occupations. People have had enough of it, for the foreign workers it’s brilliant money. But 9/10 the money they make doesn’t stay within, which is bad for our economy.
The numbers weren't "uncontrollable", for the reasons listed above (we have controls; we just didn't use them - blame your own government for that) and researchers found that immigration has very little impact on wages. It's not guaranteed that Brexit will reduce immigration. Where does your 9/10 stat come from, or did you make it up? I'm sure I read that EU workers are generally net contributors to the UK economy.
Then you have Mrs Merkel saying to these East Europeans, and North Africans. “ Yes please we want you to come here
Merkel's emergency policy applied to Syrian refugees. Syria is in Asia, not in Eastern Europe or Africa. Look up what Angela Merkel actually said, not what you think she said.
The main thing for me was, having to do what these unelected people told us to do. That will all stop now, and thank god!
No it won't. You will have no say in the trade negotiations, and other countries (who have far more clout than we do) will drive hard bargains with nasty secret dispute resolution systems over which we'll have absolutely no democratic input. If we want to trade with the EU we'll still have to follow their rules (we just won't have any influence on them any more). Oh, and the EU isn't "unelected". You didn't vote for Juncker, but nor did you vote for Theresa May or David Davis or Oliver Robbins. And you're massively exaggerating the EU's power and influence. Bet you can't name a rule that the EU imposes on you, and most of it will be carbon-copied into British law anyway. Most of it is dull, low-level product regulation, it isn't anything that matters.
We don’t need to worry about having a no deal. They will want to make trades with us, more than we will to them.
Wow. That was a dodgy assumption two years ago, and it's certainly not looking good now. True, the EU won't want to lose the UK's trade but the idea that they need us more than we need them is frankly away with the fairies. Did you not know that 8% of the EU's trade was with the UK in 2016, whereas 44% of ours went the other way (figures vary, but nobody disputes the imbalance)? That doesn't sound to me like we have the upper hand - they can make up 8% a lot more easily than we can find 44%, and they're a lot bigger to share the hit.
What makes me laugh is these idiots calling for a second referendum. Forget it! It was a massive turnout of voters, and frankly it would be shambolic and laughable to have a second vote.
I'm not sure about a second referendum either, but I don't think it's as idiotic as you make out. 51.9 to 48.1 isn't "massive" - it's equivalent to winning 17-16 on penalties. Most polls suggest that there is already a majority in favour of remaining (yeah, I know, you don't believe the polls...but what have you got instead?). Do we have to do something that the majority no longer want? Does Brexit last forever, regardless if the majority have changed their minds?
Mr Corbyn can try as much as he likes for a General Election, the thing is he is such a clown he will put us straight back into the EU. Thankfully he and his Labour Party will not be in power for Some considerable time.
Given that Corbyn has been a long-term critic of the EU and seems very lukewarm about a second referendum, I'm not sure you're right about that either. You might be passionate about leaving the EU, but you seem to forget that (at least) 48% - and probably rising - think it's a bad idea, so it's not the electoral poison that you think it is. Labour don't need a big swing to get into power (May's majority is tiny) and it may be Tory failure rather than Labour appeal that makes the difference. I'm not keen on Corbyn but if he committed to stopping Brexit I'd be more likely to vote for him. Plenty of people will vote Labour regardless, out of habit, and you can't just ignore Remainers - we have a vote too. You're making the mistake of thinking that everybody thinks the same as you. I'm a strong Remainer - as you may have gathered - and I guess you're passionately the other way...but there's a big lump of unconvinced people in the middle who voted Leave for a laugh or because they didn't like Cameron or whatever, and then there's all the "don't knows". Brexit is already looking more than dodgy as the Leavers' easy promises dissolve one by one (where's the "easy deal" and all that dosh for the NHS?), and it doesn't take much to shift floating voters.
