- Joined
- 5 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 8,571
A bit too late, she MUST know the the EU are willing to negotiate, or there is no point in delaying the vote.
A bit too late, she MUST know the the EU are willing to negotiate, or there is no point in delaying the vote.
Surely the point being that it would only take 3% of voters to fall into this category and vote differently for the overall result to be different. I personally feel that the numbers that 'voted blind' because it seemed like a fun rebellous thing to do; or believed the what they read on the side of buses; or were so obsessed with a single issue (most likely immigration) that they didnt consider other aspects in the bigger picture, or whatever would come to far more than 3%The whole leavers didn't being to know what they voted for thing is a myth. Of course, some people weren't informed and didn't care, but the sweeping statements from some in the Leave camp is a little disrespectful. I've heard a myriad of reasons why people voted Leave.
.
Why would they vote against the vote?Apparently she might not be able to pull the vote as they will have to vote on pulling the vote and a number of Tories will vote against.
Laura Kuenssberg not sure:
Edit: 3 Tory MPs have confirmed they will vote against delaying the vote but there is confusion on the process.
Why would they vote against the vote?
But why do Tory MP's want to go through with May's vote that is going to get rejected?Because they want a vote on May's Deal, I think ostensibly to chuck it out (certainly the reasoning of 1 Tory MP).
Although the vote for the vote may not be necessary:
Maybe they are willing to give us the deal that Dave wanted, in order to keep us in.But, but, but we were told May’s deal wasn’t negotiable.
What a load of horse s**t, the British public are being taken for fools. Classic EU orchestrated last minute drama. No doubt May will come back from Brussels, step off the plane waving a piece of paper
EU Court of Justice have also just ruled that Brexit can be reversed. Amazing timing , what a coincidence! I thought courts were meant be free from political interference. If the timing of that announcement isn’t political then I’m a monkey’s uncle.
But why do Tory MP's want to go through with May's vote that is going to get rejected?
But if May is off to try and better the deal, why vote against stopping the vote??Because they see May's deal as an acceptable deal, whether they are Remain or Leave. Here's one:
https://twitter.com/JamesDuddridge?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1072111573370572801&ref_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-parliaments-46506969
But if May is off to try and better the deal, why vote against stopping the vote??
Just when we thought it couldn't get any more confusing!
So Teresa wasn't going to change her deal AT ALL.
The EU weren't going to offer more favourable terms AT ALL.
Now the EU court has announced Britain could rescind Brexit without another member's approval and suddenly the Commons vote is off and Teresa's off to Brussels.
Who do you think you can trust least: ANY politician or ANY OUFC chairman?
Vince Cable was just asked, if another referendum had the result of 48%-52% in favour of staying in the EU is that acceptable and he said YES as we have to draw a line under this.
Gobsmacked!
Yep. An absolutely f**king mess which is all of the Maybot's and the Tories making since the Referendum.
The number of OAPs is going up - not down - as time goes on.Remainers would probably also accept 51/49 (surprise, surprise) but doubt they would except 49/51, insisting that opinion is shifting in their direction and in a couple of years time when a few more OAP’s had died they will get the ‘correct’ result.
Vince Cable was just asked, if another referendum had the result of 48%-52% in favour of staying in the EU is that acceptable and he said YES as we have to draw a line under this.
Gobsmacked!
The number of OAPs is going up - not down - as time goes on.