National Politics 🔵 The Conservative Party

  • Thread starter Thread starter QR
  • Start date Start date
Loads of new legislation to help tenants:
Awaab’s Law -autumn 2025
Tenants Rights Bill - May 2026

It should also be added that Reform voted AGAINST the Renters Rights bill, just like they voted against the Worker's Rights Bill. I'd have thought these are the sort of motions the 'Party of the Working People' would have got fully behind? 🤷‍♀️
 
Where have there been votes on mass immigration? Or are you extrapolating this from somewhere?
Brexit was a de facto vote on immigration for many.
Boris got in on the broken promise of net tens of thousands.
The rhetoric from every single conservative government of the last 14 years was lower immigration. They then got power and did what they pleased anyway.
 
Brexit was a de facto vote on immigration for many.
Boris got in on the broken promise of net tens of thousands.
The rhetoric from every single conservative government of the last 14 years was lower immigration. They then got power and did what they pleased anyway.
Immigration was part of the issue in all of these, not the whole issue. The Brexit vote was near as damn it 50-50, and to say everyone who voted Brexit was doing so purely because of mass immigration is a stretch, whereas the Tories have never been elected with the majority of the vote.
 
Immigration was part of the issue in all of these, not the whole issue. The Brexit vote was near as damn it 50-50, and to say everyone who voted Brexit was doing so purely because of mass immigration is a stretch, whereas the Tories have never been elected with the majority of the vote.
I never claimed everyone who voted Brexit was doing it due to mass immigration, I only claimed it was a primary factor for many Brexit voters which is the truth.
 
Immigration was part of the issue in all of these, not the whole issue. The Brexit vote was near as damn it 50-50, and to say everyone who voted Brexit was doing so purely because of mass immigration is a stretch, whereas the Tories have never been elected with the majority of the vote.

Leave17,410,74251.89%
Remain16,141,24148.11%

Only 1.2 million in it, chump change. I get your point, but I think looking solely at the percentages misses the fact that the leave vote won by the population of Birmingham plus change.
 
I never claimed everyone who voted Brexit was doing it due to mass immigration, I only claimed it was a primary factor for many Brexit voters which is the truth.
Yes, and I was saying it didn't count as some sort of proxy vote on immigration only. Which it didn't.
 


Leave17,410,74251.89%
Remain16,141,24148.11%

Only 1.2 million in it, chump change. I get your point, but I think looking solely at the percentages misses the fact that the leave vote won by the population of Birmingham plus change.
Yeah I wasn't disputing that, more the assertion that can be used as some sort of measure for the public feeling on mass immigration. That was part of the vote, no denying that, but it isn't the reason everyone who voted to leave did so.

If I was of the mind to do it, I could also try to claim that if this WAS a big vote on mass immigration, then only 17.5M out of a population of 60+M voted for it, so it's hardly a victory against mass immigration. But once again, that is simplifying things too much.
 
Yes, and I was saying it didn't count as some sort of proxy vote on immigration only. Which it didn't.
I didn't say people voted for Brexit purely on immigration though.

Happy to accept the argument it wasn't a proxy immigration vote.
 
Apologies if I've misinterpreted your comments, that's what I read it as.
Youre right I said it was a proxy vote on mass immigration which is contentious to be fair (I myself was more annoyed at what I perceived as a democratic deficit), I just never made the claim it was the main issue for all Brexit voters.

Maybe proxy vote was poorly worded. I just feel the winners of elections (Brexit, Boris, Cameron) won elections on the rhetoric that they would lower immigration when they didn't.

If people feel their wishes are constantly ignored then it's no surprise they will vote Reform.
 
Hands up if you want immigration to increase . . . . .


Nobody . . . ?

🤷‍♂️


What I think the majority of people DO want is a sensible immigration policy, that benefits the UK with people with a variety of skills who make a net contribution economically and culturally to make the country a better place. No doubt there's lots of arguments around what that actually looks like in terms of our needs and how you measure it, but I would imagine MOST on here can see how sensible controlled immigration can benefit everyone.

Surely nobody wants uncontrolled immigration. Nobody wants people arriving here in small boats controlled by OCGs. Nobody wants a huge backlog of people accommodated in hotels whilst we struggle to process claims because we stripped out the processing capacity. And I would expect that very few people want Higher Education establishments that are only viable when propped up by huge numbers of foreign students either!

Incidentally @Londox, I notice you were waxing lyrical about the genius of the creator of Terry Tibbs and Fonejacker, Kayvan Novak on another thread. How wonderful for the UK then that this culutal enrichment was made possible by us allowing his Iranian parents to settle here.
 
Hands up if you want immigration to increase . . . . .


Nobody . . . ?

🤷‍♂️


What I think the majority of people DO want is a sensible immigration policy, that benefits the UK with people with a variety of skills who make a net contribution economically and culturally to make the country a better place. No doubt there's lots of arguments around what that actually looks like in terms of our needs and how you measure it, but I would imagine MOST on here can see how sensible controlled immigration can benefit everyone.

Surely nobody wants uncontrolled immigration. Nobody wants people arriving here in small boats controlled by OCGs. Nobody wants a huge backlog of people accommodated in hotels whilst we struggle to process claims because we stripped out the processing capacity. And I would expect that very few people want Higher Education establishments that are only viable when propped up by huge numbers of foreign students either!
Totally agree but it does appear that we have more here at the moment waiting in their application to be looked who aren’t in the category what we want that will benefit the UK.
 
Jenrick has just said the Tory’s have broken Britain . These politicians, you couldn’t make it up.
 
Jenrick has just said the Tory’s have broken Britain . These politicians, you couldn’t make it up.
Goodness.
And there used to be something called collective responsibility.
To be honest, being a big part of the Conservative party in the past few years, he looks a total t*** if he said that snd hopefully he loses his seat at the next election
 
Totally agree but it does appear that we have more here at the moment waiting in their application to be looked who aren’t in the category what we want that will benefit the UK.
I get what you are saying Baz and yes, there must be concerns about some of those awaiting processing. There are after all bad apples in ALL parts of society so stands to reason that there will be amongst those waiting, no doubt. But the corrolary of that is there are likely to be a significant number who can and want to contribute positively . . .and we should not throw the baby out with the bath water!
 
All these absolute sh*ts that put the UK in the very position they say it's now in, trying to fly a different flag to keep their careers. And Farage will let them because he's only interested in power. Absolutely embarrassing.
 
Totally agree but it does appear that we have more here at the moment waiting in their application to be looked who aren’t in the category what we want that will benefit the UK.
True - just look at any boat coming over. Overwhelmingly young men here to work in the shadow economy and commit crime. Many who have entered have killed and assaulted innocent people.

Essentially, all boat/lorry/illegal arrivals should be deported, and anyone arriving via the correct channels should be processed and removed or returned to their place of origin, or allowed in.

That's obviously separate to legal, student, and work-related migration, which is something else entirely and involves mostly legitimate arrivals.

Tories failed to do it, Labour have done a bit better rhetorically but the proof will be in the pudding. Reform are the symptom of this horrendous mismanagement.
 
I get what you are saying Baz and yes, there must be concerns about some of those awaiting processing. There are after all bad apples in ALL parts of society so stands to reason that there will be amongst those waiting, no doubt. But the corrolary of that is there are likely to be a significant number who can and want to contribute positively . . .and we should not throw the baby out with the bath water!
I totally agree again.
Someone that can offer this country a great service in whatever capacity they’re an expert in that would benefit all of us great, but economic migrants or those just trying to get a better life even though they’re not being persecuted in any way then no sorry.
And as an aside yes the UK have those who want a better life but don’t want to contribute in any way and they should be dealt with, but how?
 
Imagine Gary Rowett taking over at Pompey or Charlton and telling us our football was too negative in the last 12 months.
 
Back
Top Bottom