https://www.Oxfordm**l.co.uk/news/17923266.teen-sentenced-running-onto-oxford-united-football-pitch/
was it worth it?
probably not (IMO)- 5 year banning order? may be a bit out of touch on these sort of matters, but isnt / wasnt it a 3 year banning order for first offence(s)? - mind you , if he'd run on the pitch at the skip- like 2 swine supporters did the OUFC away visit before last, it wouldve constituted a slap on the wrist fine and NO banning order! Its a postcode lottery / police force lottery re banning orders for pitch encroachment apparently. At the skip it carries NO banning order, whereas at the breeze block it equates to a 5-year banning order- strange that its not uniform across England?https://www.Oxfordm**l.co.uk/news/17923266.teen-sentenced-running-onto-oxford-united-football-pitch/
was it worth it?
probably not (IMO)- 5 year banning order? may be a bit out of touch on these sort of matters, but isnt / wasnt it a 3 year banning order for first offence(s)? - mind you , if he'd run on the pitch at the skip- like 2 swine supporters did the OUFC away visit before last, it wouldve constituted a slap on the wrist fine and NO banning order! Its a postcode lottery / police force lottery re banning orders for pitch encroachment apparently. At the skip it carries NO banning order, whereas at the breeze block it equates to a 5-year banning order- strange that its not uniform across England?
The way the 2 'football' offences have been lumped in with an assault, that took place elsewhere, and reported on and dealt with as 3 related offences instead of 2 football related plus a seperate assult, doesnt sit entirely right with me - it reinforces the outdated perception that all football supporters are thugs and idiots - bad reporting by OM, IMO
The majority of football supporters go to watch a game of football and enjoy a day out and a few beers with mates.
This knobhead is not a football supporter, he’s a thug that none of us want.
Continue to get shot of these low life’s from the game and maybe that perception will change.
Be too soft and it never will.
[/QUOTE
Hanging is far too good for them ?![]()
probably not (IMO)- 5 year banning order? may be a bit out of touch on these sort of matters, but isnt / wasnt it a 3 year banning order for first offence(s)? - mind you , if he'd run on the pitch at the skip- like 2 swine supporters did the OUFC away visit before last, it wouldve constituted a slap on the wrist fine and NO banning order! Its a postcode lottery / police force lottery re banning orders for pitch encroachment apparently. At the skip it carries NO banning order, whereas at the breeze block it equates to a 5-year banning order- strange that its not uniform across England?
The way the 2 'football' offences have been lumped in with an assault, that took place elsewhere, and reported on and dealt with as 3 related offences instead of 2 football related plus a seperate assult, doesnt sit entirely right with me - it reinforces the outdated perception that all football supporters are thugs and idiots - bad reporting by OM, IMO
In the Checkatrade as well!The guy’s a knob. At least save it for Millwall or West Ham. Not f*****g Cheltnumb.
The teacher or the one on a 5 year ban ? Which ones the tool?I know someone who taught him at school. A tool.
The teacher or the one on a 5 year ban ? Which ones the tool?![]()