- Year of First Game
- 1998
![]() |
![]() |
That’s a great point. I was trying to think about who I’d liken him to we really don’t have a player like him who can run through midfield with power and purpose. He was brilliant yesterday although looked like a foul away from being carded at any point.Matos is one of the only players we have had willing to drive forward with the ball since Shandon Baptiste left. He's also a unit who loves to put a tackle in and is very much up for the battle.
Still a bit of a work in progress, and has looked a little inconsistent at times. But that means that he's unlikely to be on the radar of the bigger clubs, and I'm equally not sure he's shown enough for Chelsea to offer an extended deal.
I would imagine that a sensible bid and a 3 (+1) year deal would be enough to get him this summer. Alternatively, a season long loan with a heavy loan fee might give Chelsea the option to get more next summer (looks like he'll be out of contract but a development fee would still apply).
That’s a great point. I was trying to think about who I’d liken him to we really don’t have a player like him who can run through midfield with power and purpose. He was brilliant yesterday although looked like a foul away from being carded at any point.
A bizarre dig at supporters for absolutely no reason!It's long been an OUFC blindspot. Including for plenty on here - who now wax lyrical about Matos (but haven't quite joined the dots).
Peterborough’s CM Hector Kyprianou is one that’s been linked with us before. 6’ 4” tall and 23 years old. Scored their second goal today to beat Brum in the league trophy finalI would like to sign him permanently, also need a physical presence who can dominate games is a much needed addition to our MF options.
Karl Robinson placed no value on players of his nature. Zero.
Some of us have been screaming for a Matos type player for years - obviously not at his level but the equivalent at League One (i.e. Panutche Camara).
It's long been an OUFC blindspot. Including for plenty on here - who now wax lyrical about Matos (but haven't quite joined the dots).
I suspect it will be the same if and when we eventually upgrade in the striker department - it'll be all 'this new guy is great, who knew there were players like this available to us'.
Agree with everything until the final sentence.
If we're lauding Matos (as we should) as a highly talented 20 year-old with a great pedigree, coming to us from a traditional Premier League power, who has a particular skillset that we've been severely lacking and has had a loan at Championship level before........wouldn't his striker equivalent be, well, Dane Scarlett?
Which is my way of saying that, yes, we clearly need to upgrade the striker department with someone who is a better finisher and has better ball-retention skills - but I don't think that's as easy as you're making out.
But we live in a world where Hull paid £2m+ for Kyle Joseph, so…![]()
QUITE!As always, identifying where we need to strengthen is by far the easiest bit.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see us looking overseas for another 9 come the summer which will no doubt trigger all the bargain basement brigade because they might not have heard of them.
But we live in a world where Hull paid £2m+ for Kyle Joseph, so…![]()
Which highlights the risks with bringing in players from overseas. On paper he looked a good bit of business.Still can’t get over that! And still yet to score after almost 800mins.
Similarly, Argyle forked out 3.5m on Baidoo who has made something like 5 starts for them.
Crazy
But we live in a world where Hull paid £2m+ for Kyle Joseph, so…![]()
He’s somebody who often likes to lecture other fans. I have a long memory, particularly regarding a specific Josh Murphy lecture delivered early last season.A bizarre dig at supporters for absolutely no reason!
LOL he gave me a bollocking for suggesting that as Murphy had looked awesome in some minor cup games it might be worth trying him in the league …He’s somebody often likes to lecture other fans. I have a long memory, particularly regarding a specific Josh Murphy lecture delivered early last season.
He’s somebody often likes to lecture other fans. I have a long memory, particularly regarding a specific Josh Murphy lecture delivered early last season.
That’s unworthy of you. You do sometimes make a decent point so stick to that and leave out the sneery lads stuff.Of course I'd like to be able to offer some critique on your posting history too, but I genuinely can't recall anything of note that you have ever contributed to this forum.
Sorry about that.
That must win an award as the one of the smuggest, self-satisfied posts to grace the forum. Well done you!Of course I'd like to be able to offer some critique on your posting history too, but I genuinely can't recall anything of note that you have ever contributed to this forum.
Sorry about that.
Who knows, we might already have the striker.Agree with everything until the final sentence.
If we're lauding Matos (as we should) as a highly talented 20 year-old with a great pedigree, coming to us from a traditional Premier League power, who has a particular skillset that we've been severely lacking and has had a loan at Championship level before........wouldn't his striker equivalent be, well, Dane Scarlett?
Which is my way of saying that, yes, we clearly need to upgrade the striker department with someone who is a better finisher and has better ball-retention skills - but I don't think that's as easy as you're making out.
Who knows, we might already have the striker.
Chap called Ole Romeny.
Agree.Honestly, I still don't know what we've got with Romeny. There's games where he looks awesome (e.g. Coventry) and games where he's utterly invisible (e.g. QPR).
I think he's generally looked better when pushed further forward, and not so great in the 10.
But is he a potential double digit goalscorer at this level? Still too early to say.
When he plays 9, he looks a different player. He can't play 10 - he pushes on too much wanting to play 9, our midfield get overrun, the opposition dominate and he sees none of the ball.Honestly, I still don't know what we've got with Romeny. There's games where he looks awesome (e.g. Coventry) and games where he's utterly invisible (e.g. QPR).
I think he's generally looked better when pushed further forward, and not so great in the 10.
But is he a potential double digit goalscorer at this level? Still too early to say.
Invisible against QPR? He stuck one in the net right in front of the East Stand!Honestly, I still don't know what we've got with Romeny. There's games where he looks awesome (e.g. Coventry) and games where he's utterly invisible (e.g. QPR).
Invisible against QPR? He stuck one in the net right in front of the East Stand!
Hasn't he always been a 10 and wide player?When he plays 9, he looks a different player. He can't play 10 - he pushes on too much wanting to play 9, our midfield get overrun, the opposition dominate and he sees none of the ball.
He's shown enough to me at 9 to start him ahead of Harris.
Wasn’t Harris always a wide player before he came here? Isn’t it a bit odd that he’s always struggled when played out wide for us?Hasn't he always been a 10 and wide player?
If thats right, it is a bit odd if he can't play as a 10?
I am.not convinced that he is good enough to be our 9.
We will know more when he plays more minutes, but regardless of where he plays he needs to show the effort of Harris and hopefully his performances improve
I am.not sure that he would have got that many ( and not sure that he would have closed down as much as Harris)Wasn’t Harris always a wide player before he came here? Isn’t it a bit odd that he’s always struggled when played out wide for us?
Romeny has played as well or better than Harris has as a striker this season. Who knows how many goals he’d have if he’d got as many starts and minutes as Harris has had…