- 6 Dec 2017
It is what we need if you don't want Mous to be knackered for most games as has been explained. It allows Mous to be rested and so be more effective when he does play.Another of KR's ex charges - what a waste - we do NOT need this type of player. Already injury dodgy (apparently) & not match fit - great.
ProsIt is what we need if you don't want Mous to be knackered for most games as has been explained. It allows Mous to be rested and so be more effective when he does play.
And you know he isn't match fit? How? Can you talk us through his injuries this season?
Last season for Charlton, he played 35 times for them in Lg 1 by the way.
Just like we did in the summer when we signed Smith....D'ohhasn't that already been explained that it's cover for mous and any decent strikers will hold out till later. would rather wait and get the right player rather than just signing any old one for the sake of it
Majority of decent players aren't available until end of the window when there club has strengthened. Don't know what's hard to understand about thatWe need strikers. Two weeks off the transfer window left.
Hate to say it, but I think we will end up with the dregs.
The difference to Pep being he played 35 times for Charlton in L1 last season and he was playing in the French 2nd tier. I agree that it is purely KR's signing.This signing seems on paper to be pure Pep of last season. Foreign player check, playing at a questionable level abroad check, barely fit check, used to play for the manager a while ago check.
I would be very surprised if this one came from the scouting system , this is pure KR and on it he will be judged (doubly so if strikers are not signed soon).